Constitution designed to be an ‘argument without end’

During the Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, the term “originalism” has surfaced. Supporters argue that Gorsuch is a perfect successor to the late Justice Antonin Scalia because the two men shared this philosophy. Scalia would say that he was an originalist because he interpreted the Constitution as the original founding fathers would have done. But is that what Justice Scalia was really doing?