Confusion leads to blown coverage on Packers Jordy Nelson

SHARE Confusion leads to blown coverage on Packers Jordy Nelson
SHARE Confusion leads to blown coverage on Packers Jordy Nelson

Packers receiver Jordy Nelson was so wide open on a 70-yard touchdown catch, it was obvious someone on the Bears blew their coverage.Nelson saw it that way took and looked to take advantage.

According to Nelson, the Packers saw that the Bears were in Cover-1. Quarterback Aaron Rodgers call an audible. The Bears responded by trying to check into Cover-2. But not all of the players on the defense heard that call. Corner back Tim Jennings was lined up opposite Nelson and played Cover-2, thinking he had help behind him.

“It sounded like they were checking to cover-2 and the way Tim played it, he played Cover-2 and then the safety still stayed one high,” Nelson said. “So based off of that is what I’m assuming what happened.”

It was a banner day for Nelson who finished the game with six catches for 152 yards and two touchdowns. Both of his touchdowns came on consecutive Green Bay drives in the second quarter.

He praised his team’s execution, less focused on how poorly the Bears defense played. With a bye week to prepare, he expected the Bears to play well.

“If you watched the New England game, it was obviously a possibility,” Nelson said. “But you expect them to play well, especially coming off a bye week. We had in the back of our heads possible changes in scheme or whatnot just because they had an extra week. But teams are going to play the way they play. They’re not going to change a whole lot.”


Twitter: @SethGruen

The Latest
During a rapid-fire “yes or no,” segment, Max Solomon and Paul Schimpf agreed that the events at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 were not an “insurrection.” But Richard Irvin touted his credentials as a lawyer and said, “I don’t think it’s a ‘yes or no’ question.”
The Cubs’ power-hitting duo of Patrick Wisdom and Frank Schwindel have combined for eight home runs in the past five games.
If only so many weren’t too lazy and incurious — and triggered by discussions of race — to click on an easy-to-find three-year-old story so that they might gain an actual understanding of the context.
At issue are pending increases in health insurance costs for Affordable Care Act plans. Voters will learn just before the November elections that temporarily boosted subsidies will expire in 2023 — unless Congress acts.
One is product shortages, as with the shortage of personal protective equipment early in the pandemic and recently with infant formula. But are we willing to pay higher prices for less reliance on the global supply chain?