Counterpoint: Cost of union work rules often inflated

SHARE Counterpoint: Cost of union work rules often inflated
SHARE Counterpoint: Cost of union work rules often inflated

Work rules are not made to be broken or hastily revoked in pursuit of hoped-for savings.

OPINION

Employees, whether unionized or not, always work under conditions — implicit or explicit — that affect both the productivity of their labor and the extent and efficiency of their use. Provisions that define a set of “work rules” are effectively the working conditions that guide employee production.

In general, rules involve a rough tradeoff between productivity and the value of the work. For example, forcing employees to work faster may increase output, but it will also likely decrease quality. Other rules, like the right to take coffee breaks, might enhance employee satisfaction, but in highly time-sensitive situations, lower productivity. Safety rules such as the wearing of protective clothing or working through a check-list of inspection items before beginning work protects the value of the work and worker, but will delay getting the job done. Still other rules, such as those governing the size of crews, the assignment of work hours, and the application of seniority, affect both the quality of a worker’s job experience and his or her productivity.

Changing these rules should be done very cautiously. The results of academic research designed to measure the effect of work rules reveals that depending on the types of rules and conditions of employment, expected savings are vastly overestimated. One problem with calls for rule changes is that they are too often solely attributed to an employer’s perceived need to lower costs. Even in unionized settings, employers have a comparative advantage in setting the rules regulating physical conditions, safety and health, work speeds, production methods, job design, technology use, and a host of personnel policies. The City of Chicago, like any private employer, would prefer setting work rules to lower the cost per unit of labor. In doing so, savings may be realized, but they would be unproductive if they came at the expense of the skill level of the work, or the quality or number of workers willing to do the job.

Rules should be negotiated to maximize the joint benefit of workers and employers. Doing so requires balancing cost with a preservation of jobs that require useful skills, provide the security of full-time employment, and work done in a safe and healthy environment.

Robert Bruno is a professor of labor and employment relations at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

The Latest
Whereas former GM Ryan Pace almost certainly would’ve insisted on making it work at left tackle to justify picking Jenkins so high, Ryan Poles doesn’t have to. He just wants to find a way to use him. It’s better to flourish at right tackle than fade at left.
Blackstone Group, owner of the 110-story building, celebrates completion of a $500 million project that, in a switch from the past, invites people into the building.
Recruits with no law enforcement experience would get a $5,000 bonus. Transfers with experience would get double that. “We’re in a crisis. They’re running for the exits,” said Ald. Matt O’Shea. “We have to try to do something.”
“I told him we don’t ever have to talk again. And I won’t speak to you, you won’t speak to me if that’s how you’re gonna refer to me,” Anderson said.
The third-year tight end is encouraged that Luke Getsy’s use of Justin Fields’ mobility can make a difference. “Justin’s on the move a lot, and he does well with that ... you see the types of throws he can make on the run and off-schedule ... and it gets exciting.”