Van Dyke’s attorneys seek to dismiss murder charges

SHARE Van Dyke’s attorneys seek to dismiss murder charges
vandyke_011117_08_66299757.jpg

Jason Van Dyke approaches the bench for his hearing with Judge Vincent Gaughan at the Leighton Criminal Courts Building in Chicago Tuesday Jan. 10, 2017. (Nancy Stone/ Chicago Tribune).

Attorneys for Chicago Police Officer Jason Van Dyke on Tuesday filed a motion seeking to dismiss murder charges filed against him in the 2014 shooting death of Laquan McDonald.

Van Dyke’s attorney Daniel Herbert argues in the three-page motion that statements Van Dyke made to investigators following the shooting were improperly used against him.

The statements made by Van Dyke, Herbert argues, are shielded under what are known as “Garrity Rights” — which offer protections to public employees from being compelled to incriminate themselves during investigatory interviews conducted by their employers. The protection falls under the Fifth Amendment, which declares that the government cannot compel a person to be a witness against one’s self.

Herbert said that statements Van Dyke made to the Independent Police Review Authority and the city’s Inspector General fall in this category.

Van Dyke, 38, is accused of shooting the 17-year-old McDonald 16 times in October 2014. But he wasn’t charged until last year, after a shocking video of the incident, filmed by a dashboard-mounted camera, was released, prompting protests across the country.

According to the motion filed Tuesday, Van Dyke and the other officers “were expressly promised the statements would not be used against them in any criminal proceedings and that they would be fired if they refused to provide the statements.”

The statements were “given under duress and are protected by the immunity” that Garrity Rights provide, the motion states.

“The prosecution and an FBI agent disclosed Garrity protected statements to grand jurors in an attempt to influence the issuance of an indictment,” the motion states.

Cook County Judge Vincent Gaughan did not rule on the motion to dismiss and scheduled the next hearing in the case for Feb. 3.

In addition, former Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez improperly shared statements with the press, according to the motion.

A representative for Alvarez said she couldn’t comment since the case is being handled by special prosecutor, Kane County State’s attorney Joseph McMahon. McMahon’s office also declined comment, citing the gag order imposed by Gaughan.

Also on Tuesday, Gaughan said he will turn over to lawyers Laquan McDonad’s juvenile records except those pertaining to the teen’s mother and sister.

Gaughan said he will review the material and rule later on whether the records are relevant in to the case.

Van Dyke’s attorneys have been twice denied the Illinois Department of Children of Family Service records by a Juvenile Court judge. They have since asked Gaughan to reconsider Judge Patricia Martin’s past decisions.

The Latest
The acquisition of Tamarack Farms makes Hackmatack National Wildlife Refuge a more impactful designation and creates within Hackmatack a major macrosite for conservation.
The man was found unresponsive in an alley in the 10700 block of South Lowe Avenue, police said.
The man suffered head trauma and was pronounced dead at University of Chicago Medical Center, police said.
Another federal judge in Chicago who also has dismissed gun cases based on the same Supreme Court ruling says the high court’s decision in what’s known as the Bruen case will “inevitably lead to more gun violence, more dead citizens and more devastated communities.”
Women make up just 10% of those in careers such as green infrastructure and clean and renewable energy, a leader from Openlands writes. Apprenticeships and other training opportunities are some of the ways to get more women into this growing job sector.