CPS CEO Forrest Claypool admits ‘mistake’ he made in IG interview

SHARE CPS CEO Forrest Claypool admits ‘mistake’ he made in IG interview
cps_071416_05_62475365.jpg

Chicago Public Schools CEO Forrest Claypool. | Sun-Times files

In a highly unusual move, Chicago Public Schools CEO Forrest Claypool publicly apologizedFridayafternoon for what he said was a “mistake” he made when CPS Inspector General Nicholas Schuler interviewed him recently in an ongoing probe of an alleged ethics-code violation by Claypool’s top attorney.

Schuler has said Claypool was involved in “an apparent whitewash” of the violation, seeking a seventh, favorable legal opinion from a political crony after six others lawyers had told CPS that its top attorney, Ronald Marmer, was breaking a CPS ethics rule.

But in a letter to Schuler that CPS releasedFridayafternoon, Claypool continued to deny that Marmer violated the ethics code by overseeing his former employer’s legal work for the schools, even as Marmer was still receiving a $1 million severance from the Jenner & Block LLP firm.

In the letter, Claypool acknowledged he had asked for changes to a bill submitted by one of two outside lawyers who found that Marmer violated the ethics code. And Claypool suggested Schuler caught him “cutting corners” about the bills when the I.G. personally questioned the CEO.

“As I have told you, I did not recall asking for changes to make the description of services on one of those bills less specific,” Claypool wrote. “However differently I recalled my past conversation, the documents you shared with me this week make it clear I did do that. I apologize for that mistake. Cutting corners, even in pursuit of the rescue of this institution, simply is not excusable. I was wrong, plain and simple.”

A CPS spokeswoman added that Claypool asked an outside lawyer “to reword the initial description of services, which involved the terms ‘ethics’ and ‘Marmer.’ The invoice was reworded to say the work concerned a personnel matter.”

The spokeswoman said James Franczek submitted the bill Claypool wanted reworded. Franczek, who has long negotiated CPS’ labor contracts, and former top CPS lawyer Pat Rocksagreed with four staff lawyers, who advised against Marmer’s involvement in the suit.

The lawyer who gave the sole opinion favoring Marmer was J. Timothy Eaton, a contributor to Claypool’s political campaigns who charged CPS $1,475.

“I had already informally asked two lawyers on contract with CPS about this issue,” Claypool wrote to Schuler. “I was disturbed when they then billed for their advice, because I had not asked for a formal opinion and did not expect to be charged for one. And, to be candid, I didn’t agree with their advice and didn’t want it to undercut public confidence in our lawsuit, or create a distraction to the civil rights violations of Chicago’s students.”

Franczek did not return callsFriday.

The bulk of Claypool’s letter defended Marmer and justified the school district’s decision to hire Jenner & Block to pursue a civil-rights lawsuit for greater state funding for CPS.

Schuler declined to commentFriday.

Claypool’s letter to Schuler was the latest in a series of twists in a 16-month saga. The I.G.’s probe was prompted by Chicago Sun-Times’ articles last year about Marmer’s Jenner & Block severance and the firm’s work for CPS.

Last December, Schuler appeared before the Chicago Board of Education to complain that CPS leaders were stonewalling the investigation.

Then, in June, Schuler told the Board of Education in a confidential report that his internal watchdog’s office was looking into “what appears to be an attempt by Claypool, and possibly others, to paper over the opinions of the six attorneys” who believed Marmer had violated the ethics code.

The code states that CPS officials cannot supervise work done by schools’ contractors with whom they have a business relationship worth more than $2,500 in the same year. Public records show Jenner & Block is paying Marmer — who left the firm in 2013 and joined CPS in 2015 —$200,000 a year in five annual installments.

The Sun-Times unearthed emails last year showing Marmer personally supervised Jenner & Block’s work for the district, with Claypool’s support.

After the June report to the school board, CPS leaders at last relented and agreed to cooperate with Schuler. The Sun-Times reported last month that Schuler interviewed Claypool in the chief executive’s office at CPS headquarters.

The Chicago Teachers Union reiterated its callsFridayfor Claypool to resign over the issue.

“He had to go to seven different law firms to get the opinion that he wants to, on the taxpayer dime, and he went back and falsified the bills to cover his tracks,” CTU Vice President Jesse Sharkey said.

Sharkey blasted Claypool for the “holier-than-thou” tone of the letter.

“He’s so sanctimonious he believes if he can come up with some justification, he can do whatever he wants,” Sharkey said.

BACKGROUND: The Watchdogs: CPS lawyer oversaw work done by former firm Claypool contributor approved as CPS general counsel CPS inspector general looks at hiring of firm with Claypool ties IG blasts CPS for allegedly impeding investigation

View this document on Scribd

The Latest
After three unimpressive performances amid modest expectations, the bar has been set even lower for Justin Fields — just show a glimmer of hope that you’re making progress. With the Bears and quarterbacks, even baby steps require good footwork.
Our 2022 report makes 15 recommendations to the chief judge on how to improve the JTDC’s treatment of youth. Evans could order many of these changes now, without waiting for another committee report.
Again salmon and trout on the lakefront lead this sprawling raw-file Midwest Fishing Report; plus on Saturday, openers come for Illinois’ catch-and-release fall trout season as well as salmon snagging at select spots on the Illinois lakefront.
MLB
The postseason will have a bit of a new look.
The point guard will have left knee surgery on Wednesday — his second one in less than a year — and insisted that he will take his return slowly. Could that cost him the 2022-23 season? Ball and the Bulls couldn’t rule that out.