Screen_Shot_2018_12_28_at_12.36.45_PM.png

COPA’s office in the 1600 block of West Chicago Avenue. | Google screenshot

COPA says threatening email it received was sent by one of its own employees

SHARE COPA says threatening email it received was sent by one of its own employees
SHARE COPA says threatening email it received was sent by one of its own employees

A threatening email sent last week to the Chicago Police Department’s oversight agency came from an agency employee.

The Civilian Office of Police Accountability issued a statement Wednesday saying it had asked for felony charges to be filed against its employee.

That came after a CPD investigation of what COPA called “a false threat of workplace violence at its West Town office” in the 1600 block of West Chicago Avenue. The email was sent Dec. 28.

“COPA takes all violations of law seriously. The waste of City resources in response to a false threat, the unnecessary alarm to our staff, other building occupants and larger Chicago community was egregious,” COPA Chief Administrator Sydney Roberts said in the statement. “COPA staff members are held accountable for their actions and we appreciate CPD’s prompt and professional work in assessing and investigating the anonymous threat.”

The employee has been placed on leave, according to COPA. Their identity was not revealed, and the exact content of the message remains unclear.

The Latest
Fans have watched more than 2.8 billion minutes of game action on MLB.TV through the first 40 days of the regular season, a 9% increase over the same period last year.
Cedric Myles, 36, was shot Tuesday in the 5300 block of West Van Buren Street.
Despite all of his obvious problems, Donald Trump backed him anyway, even posting a late defense of the serial screw-up on his Truth Social account.
Nearly a year ago, a $866.8 million shortfall had been projected for 2023. But a top city official warned Wednesday that the revised shortfall of roughly $306 million is still “very preliminary” and easily could rise.
Hochul is right that the Supreme Court has recognized exceptions to the freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment. She is wrong in thinking that “hate speech” is one of them.