Amy Coney Barrett wouldn’t even comment on the reality of climate change? Oh, please

When asked a non-political, non-controversial question on climate change, Barrett should have jumped at the chance to finally give an actual answer — but she didn’t.

SHARE Amy Coney Barrett wouldn’t even comment on the reality of climate change? Oh, please
Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett speaks during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill on Oct. 13, 2020.

Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett speaks during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill on Oct. 13, 2020.

Rod Lamkey/Pool via AP

The confirmation process of Ms. Amy Coney Barrett is a sham in many ways. Since the outcome is a foregone conclusion, it has ceased to be an educational process on her judicial philosophy (though she will hold so much of our fate in her hands).

The questioners make political speeches, and the candidate herself finds clever ways to say nothing, so as not to incur the wrath of her mentor, President Donald Trump.

Opinion Newsletter

When asked a non-political, non-controversial question, Barrett should have jumped at the chance to finally give an actual answer — but she didn’t. She gave a mealy-mouthed non-answer about whether climate change is happening. Science says that it is, and visible proof abounds. But yet, she replied that “it is a very contentious matter of public debate.”

In any other realm, this would disqualify her for nomination to any court, much less the Supreme Court. It was heartening to hear the she believes that the coronavirus is infectious and smoking causes cancer.

Does she think that antibiotics cure infections, or is that a matter of “public debate” as well?

Some Republicans deny climate science because their backers are in the fossil fuel industry. Trump makes light of COVID-19 because it hurts his re-election chances, but that doesn’t change the facts.

I would expect a candidate for the Supreme Court to be a person with the intelligence and reasoning ability to base decisions on facts. Ms. Barrett is not such a person. She should not be on the court.

Carol Kraines, Deerfield

SEND LETTERS TO: letters@suntimes.com. Please include your neighborhood or hometown and a phone number for verification purposes. Letters should be 350 words or less.

Eddie Johnson investigation

Mayor Lori Lightfoot owes an apology to the people of Chicago for her handling of this farce of an investigation regarding former Police Supt. Eddie Johnson, as well as to Fraternal Order of Police President John Catanzara, whose full police powers should be restored.

Catanzara is the only one who is actually following the mayor’s own police accountability recommendations by reporting misconduct at the highest levels. Catanzara was stripped of his police powers more than two years ago after filing a police report against Johnson. The then-superintendent had marched on the Dan Ryan Expressway during an anti-violence protest.

There should be a prompt resolution of Catanzara’s disciplinary investigation. Public confidence will never be restored so long as Lightfoot leaves a double standard in place.

David L. Milligan, Portage Park

The Latest
Jonathan Vallejo, 38, of River Grove, suffered multiple gunshot wounds in the Friday shooting and was pronounced dead at Lutheran General Hospital, the Cook County medical examiner’s office said.
Brian Boomsma of Dutch Farms in Pullman and Hoffmann Family of Cos. in Winnetka made two separate offers to buy Oberweis Dairy.
Philadelphia’s Tyrese Maxey jumped into the national spotlight this season, becoming an All-Star, leading the 76ers to the playoffs and edging out White for the league award.
Funeral services for Huesca will be held at 10 a.m. Monday at St. Rita of Cascia Catholic Church at 7740 S. Western Ave. in Chicago, according to the Fraternal Order of Police.