Abortion funds need more support to help women who lack access to abortion care

A good number of those who get help from abortion funds are young, people of color or are already parents.

SHARE Abortion funds need more support to help women who lack access to abortion care

Over a thousand people marched around downtown Chicago for abortion rights after the Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade on June 24.

Tyler Pasciak LaRiviere/Sun-Times

As soon as the Supreme Court handed down its ruling that signaled the end of legal abortion in much of the country, calls for donations to abortion funds immediately rang out.

There are at least 90 of these funds — donor-funded nonprofits that are often staffed by volunteers who help people obtain abortions they can’t afford.

Before the ruling, abortion was already inaccessible in many cases because of restrictive laws in such states as Texas and Mississippi that have left many counties with no abortion clinics at all. Abortion funds generally partner with providers to help cover some out-of-pocket procedural costs on behalf of the patient, and some funds cover associated expenses such as travel, child care and lodging for overnight stays.

As a social work professor who studies reproductive health care, I have led research that reviewed thousands of case records of patients who requested assistance from abortion funds. Here are three main findings from the studies I’ve conducted so far:

Many who receive help are likely to be people of color, parents

About 20% of the people aided by these funds were 11-19 years old, according to studies I led based on national data collected from 2010-2015. In contrast, only 14% of all people getting abortions are in that age group.

As is the case for all patients who have abortions, more than half of the people getting help from the abortion funds we studied were in their 20s. Only 18% of them were in their 30s, versus 25% of all patients.

My team also found that only 60% of abortion fund patients were single, compared with 86% of all patients. And we determined that 50% of them were Black, versus 36% overall.

Nearly 60% of patients aided by abortion funds have children. Around 41% have one or two children, as opposed to 46% of all people who got abortions, and 18% of abortion fund patients had three or or more children, versus 14% overall.

These findings suggest that younger parents of color were disproportionately affected by abortion barriers during this period.

Youngest patients hardest hit by costs

My research team found that abortion funds didn’t cover the full cost for patients, or even the entire gap between the cost and what they could afford.

Patients typically requested help to pay for a procedure they expected to cost over $2,200, when patients could only pay an average of $535. Abortion funds, in turn, were able to pledge an average of $256 on behalf of each patient.

We also determined that abortion costs were highest for patients age 11-13, at just over an average of $4,000. Those patients had only an average of $616 to pay those bills, and they received an average pledge of $414.

I also participated in another project that analyzed more detailed data collected from 2001 to 2015 from an abortion fund operating in Florida. These patients faced an average procedural cost of almost $1,000 and received $140 in aid from the fund, on average.

When patients have trouble paying for an abortion, it can delay the procedure. That, in turn, tends to make it even more expensive.

Patients need help with travel, child care

Patients seeking help from abortion funds face many obstacles besides paying medical bills that make it hard for them to get the care they were seeking. Another study I led found that the typical abortion fund patient faced two of these barriers.

Common challenges included juggling their parental responsibilities with finding the time and the means to travel long distances to a provider — including when mandatory waiting periods require multiple visits. Patients also dealt with unemployment or underemployment and unstable housing.

For full-time students, it could be hard to schedule appointments that would not interfere with their studies.

The National Network of Abortion Funds, an umbrella group, estimates that abortion funds helped about 56,000 patients in 2019, the most recent data available.

By overturning Roe v. Wade, the justices have left it up to the states to decide whether abortion will be allowed within their borders. Abortion access will likely declineincreasing costs in many places for patients who will have to travel to another state.

Abortion funds, in turn, are likely to get more requests for support. These groups say they plan to respond by helping as many people as they can.

Gretchen E. Ely is professor of social work and PhD program director at the University of Tennessee.

This article was originally published on theconversation.com

The Latest
This season’s fastest and toughest games, Elmhurst’s elite season, the CPS coaching tree and a look ahead.
Williams resigned unexpectedly Wednesday with little explanation other than that he was leaving “to take care of my health and family.”
The top remains stable and three teams make season debuts: Naperville Central, Lincoln-Way West and Morris.
Despite glitches in other courthouses, the first week of bail reform in Cook County went relatively smoothly. But hearings were slower than usual, marked by extensive arguments from prosecutors and defense attorneys as they tested guidelines under the Pretrial Fairness Act.
The complete area football schedule for the sixth week of the season.