Hospitals must be more transparent about health care costs

The federal government directed hospitals in 2019 to publish clear, consumer-friendly charge lists for 300 of their most common services by the beginning of last year. Six months later, just 6% of hospitals nationwide had complied,

SHARE Hospitals must be more transparent about health care costs
A patient undergoes kidney dialysis at a clinic in Sacramento, Calif., on Sept. 24, 2018.

Too few hospitals are following federal rules requiring transparency on health care costs, one health care expert writes.

Rich Pedroncelli/AP photo

Some Illinois hospitals are keeping their prices secret from their patients. Only three out of a sample of 11 major medical facilities in the state are fully compliant with a federal rule requiring hospitals to publish the costs of common services, according to data from the nonprofit group That includes hospitals in Chicago.

Hospitals shouldn’t be able to get away with flouting the law like this. Price transparency empowers patients and payers to shop around for medical care — and ultimately allows them to leverage the power of competition to extract the best value for their health care dollar.

The federal government directed hospitals in 2019 to publish clear, consumer-friendly charge lists for 300 of their most common services by the beginning of last year. Six months later, just 6% of hospitals nationwide had complied, according to a study published in June in the medical journal JAMA.

The federal government only began penalizing hospitals for declining to list their prices last month. Two Georgia hospitals were the first to be fined. The facilities had also ignored letters from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services asking them to publicly disclose what they charge for procedures.

Opinion bug


CMS has issued more than 350 such warning letters requesting compliance since the rule took effect. Yet transparency has lagged.

The biggest medical centers have been among the worst offenders. Just 0.5% of facilities owned by the country’s three largest hospital systems — including one that operates multiple hospitals in Illinois — were fully compliant as of early 2022, according to the study.

Hospitals may be leery of revealing their prices because the results can be embarrassing. In one case, an Illinois patient reportedly received a $15,000 hospital bill for an EpiPen. He later learned he could have purchased the same device from a pharmacy for $320.

Or take the recent experience of a couple in Fresno, California. According to reporting from NPR, the husband underwent cataract surgery with an in-network provider that cost over $4,000. His wife, who has the same coverage, received the same exact procedure at a neighboring clinic — and only owed $204. The two facilities were just a half mile from one another.

Opinion Newsletter

In Texas, a Cesarean section costs a woman without insurance just over $8,000 at one hospital in suburban Dallas. Just 15 minutes down the road at a different hospital in Dallas, that same procedure would cost nearly $20,000 more.

In Washington, D.C., a basic CT scan could cost a cash payer anywhere from $81 to $1,800, depending on the hospital.

High-cost providers wouldn’t be able to get away with those wide price spreads if patients and payers knew about them. That’s why a 2021 RAND Corporation study projected that improving price transparency could reduce U.S. health care spending by up to $26.6 billion a year.

Of course, some hospitals may be justified in charging more than others. Factors like quality, convenience and the reputation of doctors and hospitals always influence price. But patients and payers should be able to evaluate those factors on their own. Hiding prices deprives them of key pieces of information that help them make prudent decisions.

Opaque prices also undermine competition — and thus help health care providers avoid improving quality or reducing costs in order to attract customers at the margin. The upshot is higher long-term costs and worse service.

The feds did the right thing by finally fining hospitals that aren’t following the rules. But more needs to be done to make hospitals in Illinois and around the country do what businesses in every other sector do every day — tell potential customers what they can expect to pay.

Sally C. Pipes is president, CEO and Thomas W. Smith Fellow in Health Care Policy at the Pacific Research Institute. Follow her on Twitter @sallypipes.

The Sun-Times welcomes letters to the editor and op-eds. See our guidelines.

The Latest
The resignation comes a week after a blistering report from the Illinois Auditor General that found 33 instances of non-compliance, including that the department did not immediately report to local states’ attorneys 28% of child abuse and neglect reports involving children who had tested positive for a controlled substance.
The eleventh annual Chicago Elite Classic, which announced its matchups on Wednesday, has scheduled a showdown between the two top-ranked freshmen.
“There is no one-size-fits-all approach, but we know that early detection of cancer saves lives,” the first lady says in the public service announcement.
Rina Foygel Barber is one of 20 to receive $800,000 stipend that “is intended to encourage people of outstanding talent to pursue their own creative, intellectual, and professional inclinations,” according to the Chicago-based John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
The network will show 15 live events, including the Chicago Public Schools boys soccer championship, three regular season football games and the Illinois High School Association football state championship games.