Schakowsky: Hands off Social Security with12 days to the Fiscal Cliff

SHARE Schakowsky: Hands off Social Security with12 days to the Fiscal Cliff
SHARE Schakowsky: Hands off Social Security with12 days to the Fiscal Cliff

if (WIDGETBOX) WIDGETBOX.renderWidget(‘9e2974f3-c675-4533-9e7c-728a5b32bf26’);

Get the Countdown Creator Pro widget and many other great free widgets at Widgetbox! Not seeing a widget? (More info)

Fiscal Cliff Notes for Dec. 19, 2012

12 days to the fiscal cliff


President Barack Obama is drawing fire from his base as Democrats are grappling with lower Social Security cost of living increases Obama is open to as part of the fiscal cliff negotiations.

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) on linking Social Security increases to the lower “chained Consumer Price Index” said in a statement, “In order to shield the wealthiest Americans from paying Clinton-era tax rates, Republicans are demanding cuts to programs that benefit the poorest Americans. Inequality in the United States is the worst it has been since the Gilded Age, and their cuts would make it worse, not better.

“One proposal is to reduce Social Security’s annual cost-of-living adjustment through the use of the so-called chained CPI. It’s a benefit cut – pure and simple – an average earner retiring in 2011 at age 65 would lose $6,000 in benefits over 15 years. It’s particularly devastating for women – who live longer, rely more on Social Security, and receive lower benefits.

“At the same time, there are proposals to increase Medicare premium costs – which come directly out of Social Security payments. It’s a double hit. With the chained CPI and higher premiums, seniors will have even less for their daily expenses.

“Two out of every three retiree rely on Social Security for the majority of their income, one in three for 90 percent or more. The average monthly benefit is $1,500 ($1,100 for older single women). Every day, I hear from constituents who cannot afford essential items – from hearing aids to food or medicine at the end of the month – because their Social Security check just isn’t big enough. For them even a small reduction in their benefits would be devastating.

“If we want to make the Social Security COLA more accurate, we should actually raise it to reflect the increased fixed costs facing seniors, particularly medical costs. We should not put a higher burden on lower-income and middle-class seniors and the millions of American families who depend on their earned benefits. To do so in order to shield the wealthiest Americans from a tax increase is nothing less than immoral.”


Glenn Kessler, who runs the Washington Post Fact Checker column, runs through the different sets of numbers in play as Democrats and Republicans grapple with fiscal cliff debt, deficit, budget and revenue issues.

Read his column on the “dueling White House and GOP perspectives HERE.


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to Andrea Mitchell on her MSNBC show after House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) unveiled his backup plan, which includes a concession–raising tax rates–albeit on households with income over $1 million. Obama also made a big concession–upping his high earner line to $400,000 from the $250,000 level.

“Speaker Boehner’s Plan B does none of the above. Plan B – I would call it “Plan Befuddled.” It’s really hard to imagine why they even came up with it, unless they just wanted to prove to their Members that unless 218 of them were ready to raise rates, it’s not going to pass. The Democrats are not going to give them that success. You can be sure of that.

The Latest
The council member accused Lightfoot of taking cues from the Archdiocese and Cardinal Blase Cupich over what parishioners are asking for — a transparent process for the future of the St. Adalbert Church property.
Former Cy Young winner pitched to a 7.88 ERA in eight starts this season; White Sox recall infielder Danny Mendick
The lion cub, born March 15, is named Pilipili, after the Swahili word for “pepper.”
The survey involved 1,250 adults, which, coincidentally, is also the number of sports-media professionals in Chicago who openly are betting on the players and teams they yap and/or write about.
Which side of town does the Cubs-White Sox rivalry mean more to?