Joe Biden’s drug policies are still oppressive

The reformed drug warrior opposes marijuana legalization and supports ‘mandatory rehabilitation’ for people who violate the government’s drug decrees.

SHARE Joe Biden’s drug policies are still oppressive

A sales clerk serves a customer at the NuEra Cannabis store in Chicago last month. President-elected Joe Biden opposes repealing a federal ban on marijuana.

Pat Nabong/Sun-Times

Joe Biden has come a long way since his days as a vociferous drug warrior. But judging from last week’s election results, Americans have come further.

The president-elect now opposes the mandatory minimum sentences and death penalties he once championed, and he portrays himself as a reformer determined to ameliorate the mass incarceration he promoted for decades. But Biden’s approach to drug policy remains intolerant and oppressive in several important ways.

Columnists bug


In-depth political coverage, sports analysis, entertainment reviews and cultural commentary.

Unlike most of his opponents for the Democratic nomination, Biden opposes repealing the federal ban on marijuana. Instead he favors decriminalizing low-level possession, a policy that was on the cutting edge in the 1970s and that won’t have much of an impact at the federal level, since the Justice Department rarely prosecutes minor marijuana cases.

In every state where marijuana was on the ballot last week, voters approved legalization of either medical or recreational use. Most strikingly, deep red South Dakota became the first state to legalize both simultaneously.

Thirty-five states now recognize cannabis as a medicine, while 15, including a third of the U.S. population, also have legalized recreational use. The latest Gallup poll puts public support for legalization at a record 68 percent.

Biden says states should be free to legalize marijuana. Yet he favors maintaining an untenable conflict between state and federal law that casts a dark shadow over the burgeoning cannabis industry, making basic business functions such as banking and paying taxes needlessly difficult, costly, complicated and fraught with legal peril.

Regarding the “opioid crisis,” Biden promises to “stop overprescribing while improving access to effective and needed pain management.” Ignoring the lessons of the last four years, he fails to recognize how ham-handed efforts to curtail prescriptions have hurt both bona fide pain patients, depriving them of the medication they need to make their lives bearable, and nonmedical users, driving them toward black-market alternatives that are much more deadly because their potency is highly variable and unpredictable.

Last week, voters in Washington, D.C., overwhelmingly approved a ballot initiative that opposes the arrest and prosecution of adults who use “entheogenic plants and fungi,” including psilocybin mushrooms, peyote, iboga root and plants that contain dimethyltryptamine. Oregon voters, meanwhile, made their state the first jurisdiction in the country to legalize psilocybin use.

Those groundbreaking measures represent a long overdue reevaluation of the government’s authority to police people’s minds by dictating which chemicals they may ingest. It’s not an issue that Biden — even in his new, reform-minded incarnation — seems to have given any thought.

Oregon voters also passed an initiative that decriminalizes low-level, noncommercial possession of all drugs, something no jurisdiction in the U.S. had ever done. The initiative makes personal possession of controlled substances, previously a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail, a citable violation punishable by a $100 fine.

Drug users can avoid the fine by undergoing a “health assessment” at an “addiction recovery center.” But they are not required to do so, and assessments are supposed to “prioritize the self-identified needs of the client.”

Biden, by contrast, claims to recognize that drug users should not be treated as criminals, but he still thinks they should threatened with criminal penalties. “I don’t believe anybody should be going to jail for drug use,” Biden said last month. “They should be going into mandatory rehabilitation. We should be building rehab centers to have these people housed.”

While Biden considers that approach enlightened and humane, there is no moral justification for foisting “rehabilitation” on people who do not want it and may not even be addicted. That policy strips people of their liberty, dignity and moral agency simply because they consume psychoactive substances that politicians do not like.

Biden, who in the late 1980s was saying “we have to hold every drug user accountable,” now wants to lock drug users in “rehab centers” rather than prisons. If that looks like an improvement, it is only because Biden’s prior record is so appalling.

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason magazine.

Send letters to

The Latest
Getz isn’t naming names, but it’s known he’s listening on everyone, Garrett Crochet, Luis Robert Jr. and Erick Fedde included. He acknowledged five or six players could be dealt as the Sox build for the future.
Two things are already clear: Sonya Massey, who called 911 for help, should still be alive. And Sean Grayson, who held six police jobs in four years, probably had no business being a Sangamon County deputy.
Hoover, called “one of the most notorious criminals in Illinois history,” is scheduled to make a rare public appearance in court Sept. 26. He claims to have renounced the criminal organization he led.
The Cubs lost to the Brewers 3-2 on Wednesday to fall 11 games back in the division standings.
The Sox’ run toward the 1962 Mets’ dreaded 120 losses looks more realistic by the day.