May be hard to judge judges for elections, but there are resources out there

SHARE May be hard to judge judges for elections, but there are resources out there
gavel3_e1537376471422.jpg

Sun-Times file photo

There are some important names near the bottom of the primary ballot next week, after the ones Cook County voters have heard — over and over again — after months-long barrage of political ads, televised debates and blow-by-blow press coverage.

They are the candidates for one of the 400-plus judges of the nation’s second-largest court system.

If you pull a Democratic voter on Tuesday, well after you’ve ticked off your choice for governor and just before you pick your choice for township committeeman, you’ll be confronted by a list of 30 candidates for 10 county-wide judgeships, and then up to a half-dozen more in your judicial sub-circuit.

Republican voters have it fairly easy: no one from the GOP is running for any county-wide judgeship, and only three of the 15 sub-circuit have contested primaries.

“A circuit court judge is not an office that nearly anybody will ever have contact with,” said Albert Klumpp, who may be the only researcher trying to tackle the question of how voters choose judicial candidates.

“It gets lost in all the noise there are so many other offices and they’re not going to remember the name of a county judge when they go to the polling place.”

That is a lot of names, and the sheer number of candidates, and the fact that judicial candidates are barred from making the kind of public statements that are typical in other campaigns, make it hard for voters to tell them apart.

What little statistical analysis is available seems to reinforce the conventional wisdom about judge races: voters are overwhelmed by their options.

In a telling trend, just having your name listed first is a growing advantage, as if befuddled voters are simply just trying to get their time in the polling booth over with. Voters, for no apparent reason, seem to favor female candidates over men, and Irish names over other ethnic groups.

Philip Spiwak, a Schaumburg attorney, changed his name to Shannon O’Malley and switched parties to Democrat from Republican before running in the northwest suburban 13th Sub-Circuit, seemingly to take advantage of the biases.

But there is a wealth of information available, said Jack Leyhane, a Chicago attorney whose blog, “For What It’s Worth” is widely considered the most definitive source of judicial race coverage.

Leyhane, who twice made unsuccessful runs for judge in the 1990s, had been discouraged about how hard it was to get the word out about his candidacy. On his site, he has links to every judge candidate’s campaign home page, and links to any online profiles and ratings from local bar associations, lists of candidate slates and endorsements and fundraiser announcements.

Leyhane said he pulls in a healthy 2 million page views in the months ahead of a primary.

“I suppose I could get more readers with celebrity gossip,” Leyhane joked. “But for voters, you’re never going to get invited to George Clooney’s villa, but you might end up in traffic court one day with one of these judges.”

The Latest
The man was found unresponsive in an alley in the 10700 block of South Lowe Avenue, police said.
The man suffered head trauma and was pronounced dead at University of Chicago Medical Center, police said.
Another federal judge in Chicago who also has dismissed gun cases based on the same Supreme Court ruling says the high court’s decision in what’s known as the Bruen case will “inevitably lead to more gun violence, more dead citizens and more devastated communities.”
Women make up just 10% of those in careers such as green infrastructure and clean and renewable energy, a leader from Openlands writes. Apprenticeships and other training opportunities are some of the ways to get more women into this growing job sector.
Chatterbox doesn’t seem aware that it’s courteous to ask questions, seek others’ opinions.