Pope Francis has picked Cardinal Blase Cupich — a key defender of the pontiff in the United States — to be part of a committee organizing an upcoming sex-abuse prevention summit.

The appointment comes as Cupich has had to defend recent comments he’s made about the abuse scandal — remarks that caused an uproar as they went viral.

Abuse survivors and women working at the Vatican will also contribute to the preparatory committee. Notably absent from the lineup announced Friday was Boston Cardinal Sean O’Malley, who heads the pope’s sex abuse advisory commission, though one of his members, the Rev. Hans Zollner, is the point-person for the group.

In addition to Zollner and Cupich, the committee includes Maltese Archbishop Charles Scicluna, for a decade the Vatican’s sex crimes prosecutor, and Indian Cardinal Oswald Gracias, a member of Francis’ key cardinal adviser group.

Francis summoned leaders of the world’s bishops’ conferences to the Vatican from Feb. 21 to 24 after the abuse scandal erupted in his native South America and again in the U.S., and he botched the case of a Chilean bishop implicated in a cover-up.

RELATED:

Cupich on scandal: ‘We have a bigger agenda than to be distracted by all of this

Bishop who didn’t alert police on abuser-priests is living at cardinal’s mansion

Cardinal apologies for ‘my poor choice of words’ on priest sex abuse crisis

Cupich orders priests to address disputed TV report at Mass

The stakes of the meeting grew exponentially after the Vatican told U.S. bishops earlier this month not to vote on proposed new measures to investigate sexual misconduct or cover ups within their ranks.

The Vatican still hasn’t explained why it blocked the vote on a U.S. code of conduct for bishops and a lay-led board to investigate them, though the proposals were given to the Vatican only at the last minute and were said to contain legal problems. The head of the U.S. bishops conference, Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, said the Holy See wanted to delay any vote until after the February global summit.

It is unlikely that such a diverse group of churchmen, some representing national churches that continue to deny or downplay the scandal, will over the course of four days come up with any universal proposals that come close to the accountability norms that U.S. bishops were seeking.

Cupich has said he was disappointed by the Vatican’s decision, but at the time of the U.S. bishops’ meeting, he proposed they go ahead and debate the measures and even came up with a revised proposal himself.

His inclusion as a member of the Vatican organizing committee is significant, since he is not himself the head of a bishops’ conference — as are Scicluna and Gracias — and would otherwise have no reason to attend the February summit. That Francis chose him over DiNardo is perhaps understood by the obvious tensions between DiNardo and the Vatican over the rejected U.S. accountability proposals and DiNardo’s public call this summer for a Vatican investigation into the U.S. scandal, which Rome refused.

Cupich, on the other hand, is far more of a defender of the embattled pope, whose popularity in the U.S. has tumbled over his uneven handling of the abuse crisis.

“Pope Francis is calling for radical reform in the life of the church, for he understands that this crisis is about the abuse of power and a culture of protection and privilege, which have created a climate of secrecy, without accountability for misdeeds,” Cupich wrote in a blog post Thursday. “All of that has to end.”

Cupich has come under fire locally for what he subsequently called “my poor choice of words” in connection with the abuse scandal. In August, former papal nuncio Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano released an explosive letter contending, among other things, that the pope knew of alleged sexual misconduct by disgraced ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick — accused of sexually preying on adult seminarians as well as children — but allowed McCarrick to continue in ministry and serve as an influential advisor.

As Vigano’s claims gained attention, Cupich gave a series of interviews, including one with NBC5, in which he said, among other things, that for the pope “to get into each and every one of those aspects, in some way is inappropriate and, secondly, the pope has a bigger agenda.”

Cupich later apologized “for the offense caused by my comments.”

The Archdiocese of Chicago declined to comment Friday about Cupich’s appointment to the preparatory committee.

Meanwhile, Zollner, who heads a safeguarding institute of study at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, acknowledged the expectations going into the meeting.

“And it’s understandable that they are high, given the gravity of the scandal that has shocked and hurt so many people, believers and not, in so many countries,” he told Vatican Media.

Vatican spokesman Greg Burke said Francis’ decision to host the meeting showed he considered protection of minors a “fundamental priority for the church.”

Contributing: Associated Press