Vrdolyak lawyers: Indictment ‘deceptive, irrelevant and sinister’

SHARE Vrdolyak lawyers: Indictment ‘deceptive, irrelevant and sinister’
Former Alderman Edward Vrdolyak leaves the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse on Nov. 22, 2016. | Santiago Covarrubias/Sun-Times

Former Chicago Ald. Edward Vrdolyak leaves the Dirksen Federal Building last year. | Santiago Covarrubias/Sun-Times file photo

Santiago Covarrubias/Sun-Times

Attorneys for Edward Vrdolyak are asking a judge to remove several details contained in the former Chicago alderman’s 2016 federal indictment, arguing that they are “deceptive, irrelevant and sinister sounding allegations.”

In a motion to strike filed Friday afternoon, Vrdolyak’s lawyers argue that much of the indictment “will confuse the jury and prejudice Vrdolyak.”

A grand jury hit Vrdolyak last November with a 19-page indictment that outlined his alleged role in a scheme to pocket millions from Illinois’ $9.3 billion settlement with tobacco companies nearly two decades ago.

The indictment alleges Vrdolyak, known as “Fast Eddie,” was promised $65 million from that settlement even though he “did no work on the Tobacco Lawsuit.”

It’s not clear how much money Vrdolyak made from the settlement, but federal prosecutors told a judge in 2010 that Vrdolyak “has a guaranteed income stream of $260,000 per year . . . until 2023 from tobacco-related litigation.”

The indictment charged Vrdolyak with impeding the IRS and tax evasion. He faces a maximum of eight years in prison for allegedly trying to help his co-defendant, Daniel Soso, dodge federal income taxes.

Vrdolyak’s attorneys are asking Judge Amy St. Eve to strike “All references to the Tobacco Lawsuit and to the Illinois Tobacco Litigation” along with language “charging secrecy and concealment” from the state, the attorney general and parties in the tobacco case.

His attorneys said prosecutors included those references to suggest Vrdolyak was guilty of something, even if he was not formally charged.

“There is no other reason for the Government to include these allegations except to insinuate that Vrdolyak must have been doing something wrong, though something that is not charged as a crime in the Indictment,” his attorneys wrote.

“Simply put, none of the allegations in the superseding Indictment under the headings ‘The Tobacco Lawsuit” or “Soso’s and Vrdolyak’s Secret Receipt of Fees from the Tobacco Lawsuit’ relate to the essential elements of either tax offense charged herein,” the motion reds. “The Government includes them only to prejudice Vrdolyak.”

The Latest
The city is willing to put private interests ahead of public benefit and cheer on a wrongheaded effort to build a massive domed stadium — that would be perfect for Arlington Heights — on Chicago’s lakefront.
Art
The Art Institute of Chicago, responding to allegations by New York prosecutors, says it’s ‘factually unsupported and wrong’ that Egon Schiele’s ‘Russian War Prisoner’ was looted by Nazis from the original owner’s heirs.
April Perry has instead been appointed to the federal bench. But it’s beyond disgraceful that Vance, a Trump acolyte, used the Senate’s complex rules to block Perry from becoming the first woman in the top federal prosecutor’s job for the Northern District of Illinois.
Bill Skarsgård plays a fighter seeking vengeance as film builds to some ridiculous late bombshells.
“I need to get back to being myself,” the starting pitcher told the Sun-Times, “using my full arsenal and mixing it in and out.”