Bush on UAE ports deal: ``People don’t need to worry about security’’

SHARE Bush on UAE ports deal: ``People don’t need to worry about security’’
SHARE Bush on UAE ports deal: ``People don’t need to worry about security’’

After a cabinet meeting this morning, President Bush today tried again to quiet the storm over whether letting an United Arab Emirates company manage six U.S. ports.

And so people don’t need to worry about security. This deal wouldn’t go forward if we were concerned about the security for the United States of America.

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

________________________________________________________________

For Immediate Release February 23, 2006

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT

AFTER MEETING WITH CABINET

The Cabinet Room

9:16 A.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you all for coming. My Cabinet just met to

get a report from Fran Townsend about the lessons learned from Hurricane

Katrina. On September the 6th, I asked Fran to conduct a thorough

review of the federal response to Katrina and to make recommendations

about how we can better respond in the future. I wasn’t satisfied with

the federal response. Fran and her team produced a lessons learned

document, and she just briefed the Cabinet about lessons learned.

I reminded our Cabinet that hurricane season begins in June and

that we will be tracking the implementations of the recommendations in

this report. I want to thank her for her report. It’s a good work. We

will learn from the lessons of the past to better protect the American

people.

We have made a strong commitment to people in the Gulf Coast and we

will honor that commitment, as well. The report helps us anticipate how

to better respond to future disasters. In the meantime, our commitment

to rebuild and help rebuild Mississippi and Louisiana is ongoing and

robust.

I’ll be glad to answer some questions. Terry. Two questions.

You’re the first questioner.

Q Mr. President, dozens of Sunni mosques have been attacked and

scores of people have been killed after the bombing of the Golden

Mosque. How serious is the danger of a civil war in Iraq?

THE PRESIDENT: First of all, the people of the United States

strongly condemn the destruction of the Golden Mosque. We believe in

freedom to worship. And I understand the consternation and concern of

Iraqi Shias when they see this most holy site wantonly destroyed.

I appreciate very much the leaders from all aspects of Iraqi

society that have stood up and urged for there to be calm. They

recognize two things — one, the Iraqi people want to live in a

democracy. After all, 11 million people voted in the last election. In

other words, given a choice of whether or not they want democracy or a

different form of government, millions of people showed up to vote,

making a clear statement to the Iraqi authorities, as well as to the

people of the world they want democracy.

Secondly, the voices of reason want all aspects of Iraqi life —

understand that this bombing is intended to create civil strife, that

the act was a evil act. The destruction of a holy site is a political

act intending to create strife. And so I’m pleased with the voices of

reason that have spoken out. And we will continue to work with those

voices of reason to enable Iraq to continue on the path of a democracy

that unites people and doesn’t divide them.

Finally, I do want to assure the Iraqi people that the U.S.

government is serious in our commitment in helping to rebuild that holy

site. We understand its importance to Iraqi society and we want to

stand side-by-side with the government in making sure that beautiful

dome is restored.

Caren.

Q Sir, do you wish you had known earlier about the Dubai Ports

deal and were you surprised by the controversy over it?

THE PRESIDENT: The more people learn about the transaction that

has been scrutinized and approved by my government, the more they’ll be

comforted that our ports will be secure. Port security in the United

States will be run by Customs — U.S. Customs — and the United States

Coast Guard. The management of some ports, which, heretofore, has been

managed by a foreign company will be managed by another company from a

foreign land. And so people don’t need to worry about security. This

deal wouldn’t go forward if we were concerned about the security for the

United States of America.

What I find interesting is that it’s okay for a British company to

manage some ports, but not okay for a company from a country that is

also a valuable ally in the war on terror. The UAE has been a valuable

partner in fighting the war on terror. A lot of goods are shipped from

ports to the United States managed by this company.

And again, I repeat to the American people, this wouldn’t be going

forward if we weren’t certain that our ports would be secure. But I

also want to remind folks that it’s really important we not send mixed

messages to friends and allies around the world as we combine — put

together a coalition to fight this war on terror.

And so we’ll continue to talk to people in Congress and explain

clearly why the decision was made. Many of those doing the explanations

are around this table, and I want to thank them for bringing a sense of

calm to this issue, as people understand the logic of the decision.

Thank you all.

The Latest
The council member accused Lightfoot of taking cues from the Archdiocese and Cardinal Blase Cupich over what parishioners are asking for — a transparent process for the future of the St. Adalbert Church property.
Former Cy Young winner pitched to a 7.88 ERA in eight starts this season; White Sox recall infielder Danny Mendick
The lion cub, born March 15, is named Pilipili, after the Swahili word for “pepper.”
The survey involved 1,250 adults, which, coincidentally, is also the number of sports-media professionals in Chicago who openly are betting on the players and teams they yap and/or write about.
Which side of town does the Cubs-White Sox rivalry mean more to?