Injuries shrinking value of White Sox’ long-term deals

Long-term deals for Moncada ($70 million), Robert ($50 million), Jimenez ($43 million) and Anderson ($25 million) seemed like good business sense when they were made.

SHARE Injuries shrinking value of White Sox’ long-term deals
Trainer James Kruk (right) has been a busy man with the White Sox this season.

White Sox head trainer James Kruk checks on third baseman Yoan Moncada after a play against the Baltimore Orioles Thursday, Aug. 25, 2022, in Baltimore. (AP)

AP Photos

SAN DIEGO — When the White Sox signed many of their rising stars to long-term deals before their free-agent seasons, presumably getting them under contract for multiple years at team-friendly costs, it seemed like a masterstroke of good business sense.

Deals for Yoan Moncada ($70 million), Luis Robert ($50 million), Eloy Jimenez ($43 million) and Tim Anderson ($25 million) gave the players financial security with potential for even bigger deals in the future. The team got multiple players with star potential and performance value at controlled costs for multiple years.

Both sides should benefit in theory.

The Sox had done the same with pitchers Chris Sale and Jose Quintana. Their team-friendly contracts also made them valuable trade pieces, and they were dealt to acquire Moncada, Michael Kopech, Jimenez and Dylan Cease.

The Sox banked on their young players with financial security to perform to projections and to be healthy enough to play regularly.

“We’ve got MVP and Silver Slugger candidates throughout that lineup, controllable for an extended period of time thanks to some foresight and proactive work on our part,” general manager Rick Hahn said last winter.

But now, three years after signing Jimenez to a six-year deal with club options for 2025 and ’26, two years after signing Moncada to a five-year deal with a club option through ’25 and two years after signing Robert to a six-year contract with two club options through ’27, their inability to avoid injuries — and, in Moncada’s case this season, to play to expectations when healthy — has raised concerns about the contracts.

Suddenly, those deals don’t look as great as a whole as they once did.

Robert will have played in 97 and Anderson in 79 of the Sox’ games this season. Both are done for the year with wrist and finger injuries, respectively, and Jimenez, who had surgery to repair a hamstring tear in April, has played in 82 games and will hobble around through the last few because of it. Moncada played in his 100th game Saturday.

After playing in 56 of 60 games during the abbreviated 2020 season, Robert played in only 68 last season. Jimenez played in 55 and Moncada in 144, which by these trends looks like a gold standard but shouldn’t be.

Moncada set his performance standard in 2019, when he batted .315/.367/.548 with 25 home runs and a .915 OPS, essentially giving the club motivation to invest. But after signing his deal, Moncada was afflicted by COVID to unknown extents and batted .225/.320/.385 with six homers in 52 games in 2020 and .263/.375/.412 with 14 homers in 2021. Hamstring issues have been problematic throughout, and an oblique strain on the last day of spring training this season set the tone for a bad year.

When the Sox weigh the pros and cons this offseason of whether to re-sign Jose Abreu, 35, whose contract is up, they will have to consider his age as well as his diminished power in 2022. They also will consider his 180 hits, which ranked second in the American League through Friday, and his durability. While watching almost everyone else go on and off the injured list or get occasional days off to rest legs, Abreu stays healthy and insists on playing through aches and pains. He played in all 60 games during his 2020 MVP season after playing 159 the year before. Abreu played in 152 last season and leads the team with 154 in 2022. AJ Pollock is next with 135.

It’s not out of the question that, in the end, Moncada, Robert, Jimenez and Anderson collectively make it all worthwhile, but for the first time, the idea of trading one of them to revitalize and reconfigure the roster could surface this offseason. The problem for the Sox is, trade values can’t be viewed as what they once were because of durability issues.

As a group, the aforementioned four were available for 55% of the disappointing Sox’ games this season, a good place to start when identifying what went terribly wrong in 2022.

The Latest
Like no superhero movie before it, the subversive coming-of-age story reinvents the villain’s origins with a mélange of visual styles and a barrage of gags.
A 66-year-old woman was dragged into the street in the 600 block of North Fairbanks Avenue by two armed robbers who fired shots, police said.
Twenty-five years later, the gun industry’s greed and elected leaders’ cowardice continue to prevail, the head of the National Urban League writes.
They have abandoned their mom and say relationship won’t resume until she stops ‘taking the money’ from her alcoholic ex.
The Sun-Times’ experts pick whom they think the team will take with the No. 9 pick in Thursday night’s draft.