NBC sticking with Bears for ‘Sunday Night Football’

The Bears were spared being cut from “SNF” in Week 11, but they still could suffer the indignity in Week 16. Plus, there are two other weeks to watch when it comes to flexing.

SHARE NBC sticking with Bears for ‘Sunday Night Football’
The NFL kept the Bears-Rams game on NBC’s “Sunday Night Football” on Nov. 17, despite the Bears’ poor season. Having the second- and third-largest TV markets in the audience helped.

The NFL kept the Bears-Rams game on NBC’s “Sunday Night Football” on Nov. 17, despite the Bears’ poor season. Having the second- and third-largest TV markets in the audience helped.

Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images

The Turk didn’t come for the Bears in Week 11.

Despite falling to 12th in the NFC playoff standings, the Bears weren’t cut from their ‘‘Sunday Night Football’’ game Nov. 17 against the Rams in Los Angeles. The Turk is the fictional creature that cuts players from NFL teams during training camp. But with the power of the No. 3 TV market behind them, the Bears were spared from its wrath.

Of course, having the second-ranked Los Angeles market helped keep the game from being ‘‘flexed’’ off NBC, too. There also were few other choices for the NFL to flex into the prime-time slot (more on that later). So Bears-Rams it is in a game that should have happened in the divisional playoffs last season.

The Bears are locked into their next two national broadcasts, both on Thursdays: Week 13 against the Lions on Thanksgiving Day in Detroit and Week 14 against the Cowboys on Dec. 5 at home, both on Fox. But they still could suffer the indignity of being removed from ‘‘SNF’’ when they host the Chiefs in Week 16. And they’re not the only ones at risk the rest of the way (more on that, too).

The NFL must decide 12 days before a game whether to flex (six days for Week 17 games), but it doesn’t have carte blanche. CBS and Fox, owners of Sunday afternoon packages, can block a game from being flexed each week. Those games aren’t made public, but you safely can assume the networks’ choices (they’re often the late doubleheader game). The league also grants them some wiggle room to change their pick during the season.

So the question generally becomes: Is the third-best game on the schedule better than the scheduled ‘‘SNF’’ game?

But there are other considerations. If a team already is scheduled for the maximum of five prime-time appearances on Fox, ESPN and NBC combined, the league can flex it in one more time. The NFL must decide when the best time is to do that. It also must determine how a switch would affect the distribution of the rest of the games that week. Flexing isn’t designed only to help NBC; it’s designed to put the best games in the best time slots.

Starting with Bears-Rams, here’s a look at the remaining schedule for the NFL’s game of the week, the flexing possibilities available and what the league might decide:

Week 11: Bears at Rams

Aside from the market advantages, the game didn’t have much available competition. We can assume CBS blocked Patriots-Eagles, a rematch of Super Bowl LII. That would make Texans-Ravens, a battle of first-place teams as of now, the third-best game of the week. The problem there is that the Texans play Thursday in Week 12. Perhaps the league didn’t want to make a short week even shorter.

Week 12: Seahawks at Eagles

This week presents a fascinating situation for the league. It already has a good game in place, but it might be able to get a better one. In the second half of its doubleheader, Fox has Cowboys-Patriots and Packers-49ers. At the start of the season, you can bet Fox chose to block the former. But now the 49ers might be undefeated. To maximize distribution, the league might move Packers-49ers to prime time and Seahawks-Eagles to noon on Fox, giving each game its own window.

Week 13: Patriots at Texans

There’s little chance the Patriots would be flexed out. CBS’ two late doubleheader games are Chargers-Broncos and Browns-Steelers. The network likely blocked the latter at the start of the season, but that game has lost its luster. The 49ers-Ravens game on Fox has potential, but Patriots-Texans figures to stay.

Week 14: Seahawks at Rams

CBS surely blocked Chiefs-Patriots, a rematch of the epic AFC Championship Game last season. That makes 49ers-Saints the third-best game, but Fox likely blocked that one on a weak Sunday for the network. So expect to see Seahawks-Rams.

Week 15: Vikings at Chargers

If the Chargers don’t have a late-season run, this game isn’t appealing. Fox certainly blocked Rams-Cowboys. Its other late game is Falcons-49ers, which would be good if not for the Falcons. Bears-Packers is a possible flex because of its drawing power. Or perhaps another game becomes worthy.

Week 16: Chiefs at Bears

The schedule for the week won’t be settled until Tuesday. Five games are TBD, and three of them will move to Saturday and air on NFL Network. The best of them is Rams-49ers. The league would benefit most knowing if flexing out of Chiefs-Bears is best before deciding when to schedule Rams-49ers. But it doesn’t have such flexibility yet. That game figures to stay on Sunday in case the Bears aren’t worth keeping in prime time. Of the games set for Sunday, Fox likely blocked Cowboys-Eagles.

Week 17: TBD

The league will pick the best game with playoff implications.

The Latest
Drug penalties are “very unfair,” the former president has said. No, wait, death sentences are OK.
A bill that would’ve banned sales of pot-like delta-8 products sailed through the Illinois Senate, but never made it to the floor of the state House. That means the mind-altering products will be unchecked for yet another summer in Chicago and beyond.
The Chicago Department of Public Health is focused on training city workers and people who live in areas with the highest suicide rates.
Durbin chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is considering a bipartisan bill to enact a press shield law. Durbin is a co-sponsor of the bill, but has yet to schedule it for a markup.
The team’s new manager hasn’t been able to get his players untracked offensively.