Maddon to Cubs who hit homers: "Act like you've done it before"

SHARE Maddon to Cubs who hit homers: "Act like you've done it before"

MESA, Ariz. – Overshadowed by all the talk of improved fundamentals, and the Cubs’ subsequent first win of the spring, new manager Joe Maddon made it clear he’s no fan of players standing to watch, or “pimping,” their home runs – something that could be worth watching if all these powerful young prospects make it in the big leagues.

Javy Baez laughed about catcher Welington Castillo watching a homer Tuesday then returning to the dugout and looking for spring coach Manny Ramirez: “He was like, `Where’s Manny? I pimped that one.’ “

Maddon said he didn’t see whether Castillo lingered to watch his homer – which came in a 10-6 loss. But after asking about the details, Maddon said, “Then we need to talk.”

Maddon’s not making a character judgment, he said.

“It’s act like you’ve done it before and you can do it again,” he said. “The touchdown celebration, all that stuff, pounding your chest after dunking a basketball, all this stuff that’s become part of today’s generation of athletes – whether you agree with it being right or wrong doesn’t matter.

“I would just prefer that our guys would act like they’ve done it before and that they’re going to do it again.”

Castillo, the clear No. 3 in the Cubs’ catching order, was considered a strong candidate to be traded before the season opener even before camp opened.

The Latest
Like films about WeCrash and Fyre Festival, stylish HBO doc tells classic story of a big idea falling hard.
It happens all over Chicago. Some folks offer a perfunctory “everyone supports housing” statement before angrily demonstrating that they are, in fact, not meaningfully supportive of new housing.
Man is upset that she’ll be standing up at the service along with her ex.
The lack of a defined, public strategy isn’t a criticism of city officials. The goal is to show that Chicago can embrace protest and the exercise of free speech rights.
If Democrats wanted to change the rules for nominating candidates, they should have waited until 2025, a non-election year. Even then, it would need some lively debate. Oh, wait, maybe that’s what they were trying to avoid.