Lawyers group blasts appointment of retired Cook County judge to immigration court

The group says Nicholas Ford has no business serving in that court based on his judicial record.

SHARE Lawyers group blasts appointment of retired Cook County judge to immigration court
Ex-Cook County Judge Nicholas Ford, who retired from the bench in April, has been appointed an immigration judge based in San Francisco, prompting criticism from a legal group.

Ex-Cook County Judge Nicholas Ford

Sun-Times file photo

Nicholas R. Ford, who left behind a checkered record when he retired from the Cook County circuit court last month, has a new job: Ford was appointed this week as a U.S. Immigration Court judge, based in San Francisco.  

The appointment immediately drew criticism from one progressive lawyers group, the National Lawyers Guild San Francisco Bay Area, which strongly condemned the move and called on the Department of Justice to immediately rescind Ford’s appointment to the bench.

“As someone who has dedicated his career to perpetuating racist state violence, Judge Ford has no place in a courtroom,” said the advocacy group’s executive director, Jay Kim, in a news release. “He is particularly unfit for Immigration Court, where he will be deciding the fate of asylum seekers and torture victims.”

Kim said her group does not frequently oppose judicial appointments but based on the circumstances felt it was necessary. The group will be tracking Ford’s work through their immigration court observation program.

A DOJ spokeswoman said immigration judges do not grant interviews.

As a former Cook County assistant state’s attorney who went on to serve as a Circuit Court judge for more than 20 years, Ford had been reversed repeatedly in cases in which the appellate courts found that Ford had improperly restricted defendants’ rights.

Ford retired from the bench in Cook County in April. In one case, the former Cook County prosecutor drew criticism for dismissing the claims of a man who contended he had been tortured into confessing to a crime by an associate of now-disgraced former Chicago Police Cmdr. Jon Burge. Ford had been personally involved with that case years earlier as a prosecutor.

The lawyer’s group specifically cited that case in their call to the Department of Justice to rescind Ford’s appointment.

Ford retained his seat on the bench several times, most recently in 2016, despite receiving a negative rating from a bar group, Chicago Council of Lawyers. The group cited two cases that raised “serious concerns about Judge Ford’s ability to decide cases in an impartial manner.”

One case outlined the 100 year sentence Ford handed down to a 16-year-old convicted of first-degree murder. In his decision, Ford had noted several things that are not supposed to influence judicial decisions, including the teen’s choice to remain silent at sentencing and the judge’s personal feelings about gangs and gang violence, the bar group wrote. That sentence was among the cases that the appellate court overturned.

The Latest
The way inflation is measured masks certain costs that add to the prices that consumers pay every day. Not surprisingly, higher costs mean lower consumer confidence, no matter what Americans are told about an improving economy.
Another federal judge in Chicago who also has dismissed gun cases based on the same Supreme Court ruling says the high court’s decision in what’s known as the Bruen case will “inevitably lead to more gun violence, more dead citizens and more devastated communities.”
With Easter around the corner, chocolate makers and food businesses are feeling the impact of soaring global cocoa prices and it’s also hitting consumers.
Despite getting into foul trouble, which limited him to just six minutes in the second half, Shannon finished with 29 points, five rebounds and two assists.