Sweet blog:CNN/YouTube Republican Presidential Candidate Debate. Transcript.

SHARE Sweet blog:CNN/YouTube Republican Presidential Candidate Debate. Transcript.

BROOKLYN, N.Y.–Republican 2008 contenders CNN/YouTube two-hour debate Thursday in Florida.

Click below for the transcript. For photos LINK

Thanks to CNN for the transcript…..

CNN/YouTube Republican Presidential Candidate Debate


November 28, 2007

Click on the following link for access to live updated debate photos: http://imageselectftp.turner.com/ImageGallery.aspx?name=fc6613bc-6e6c-45…

GREER: Welcome to tonight’s presidential debate, co-sponsored by

the Republican Party of Florida. It is my pleasure tonight to

introduce the man who has brought new ideas to state government, and

whose leadership has been embraced by the voters of Florida, and who

has become the nation’s most popular governor.

Ladies and gentlemen, Governor Charlie Crist.


CRIST: Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.

And welcome to the Sunshine State. It’s great to have this debate in

Florida, in my home town of St. Petersburg.

It’s an important evening. We’re going to hear from some great

candidates, great Republicans. And we should have fun with it. The

questions come from the people, as Anderson said. This is truly the

people’s debate.

But it’s also important to understand what we’re talking about:

the future of America; about integrity; about honor; about duty; and

about loyalty. That’s what America always has stood for and always


So let’s meet some of these great candidates.

First, Congressman Duncan Hunter.


Congressman Ron Paul.


CRIST: Senator John McCain.


Senator Fred Thompson.


Mayor Rudy Giuliani.


Governor Mitt Romney.


Governor Mike Huckabee.

CRIST: And Congressman Tom Tancredo.


COOPER: OK, John King is standing by, as well as Gloria Borger.

Gloria, a lot of elbows being thrown on the campaign trail the

last couple of days. What are you expecting tonight?

BORGER: Well, I think tonight you might see a lot of elbows

being thrown at Mitt Romney. He’s really the guy to beat out there.

He’s been ahead in Iowa and New Hampshire. He’s looking in his

rearview mirror now. He sees Mike Huckabee moving up on him in Iowa,

and every other candidate has a shot in New Hampshire, so he’s the


COOPER: John King, this Rasmussen poll shows Mike Huckabee right

now in the lead in Iowa.

KING: He is moving up in Iowa, Anderson. And that is part of

the debate, about which Republican Party — what will the Republican

Party look like when it picks its new leader?

Mike Huckabee is someone who is running on the anti-abortion

agenda, as are so many of the other candidates tonight. But the

national frontrunner is Rudy Giuliani, who favors abortion rights.

Not since Ronald Reagan won in 1980 has the Republican Party even

brokered the notion of having a nominee who supported abortion rights.

You also have a Republican president at this moment and one of

the candidates on stage, Senator McCain, who were behind that big so-

called comprehensive immigration reform that would give legal status

to 12 million or more illegal immigrants in the United States. Well,

now opposition to that legislation is one of the defining debates in

the Republican Party.

KING: So, from a personality standpoint and a substantive

standpoint, this is a fascinating time as the Republican Party decides

who its leader will be and what its agenda will be after George W.

Bush passes from the stage, Anderson.

COOPER: Gloria, the clock is ticking toward Iowa.

BORGER: Absolutely. And they know that right now, starting with

this debate, they’ve really got to define themselves, differentiate

themselves, because the voters in Iowa still pretty much are

undecided. So, it’s anyone’s game right now.

The holidays are coming up. And this is one opportunity for each

of these candidates to tell the voters who he is and why he’s

different from the other guy.

COOPER: We are just watching the traveling press pool leave the

auditorium. We’ll get started in just a moment.

Welcome, candidates. Good to have you all on the stage. Thanks

for being here.


Now, as there was last time with the Democratic candidates,

there’s been some concern among the campaigns about what kind of

questions are going to be asked tonight.

COOPER: And with 5,000 questions to choose from, we certainly

had a lot of options.

Take a look.


COOPER (voice over): Many groups tried to organize submissions.

Will Dick Armey’s question be seen tonight?

DICK ARMEY: I will put that together as a YouTube…

SNOWMAN CARTOON CHARACTER: And this is a question for Mitt


COOPER: How about the much maligned snowman? Will he rear his

frozen head here in sunny Saint Pete?

UFO CARTOON CHARACTER: So he wants to know what you would do

about me and other kids like me — the unwitting children of illegal

— well, you know.

COOPER: Dennis Kucinich may have seen a UFO, but we’ll have no

little green men here in Florida.

ACTOR AS “THE GHOST OF RICHARD NIXON”: I am the ghost of Richard


We won’t be seeing Richard Nixon, or little kids used to make

adult points.

Though, there is one question where kids may make an appearance.

And don’t worry, we tried to keep out of most of the Abe Lincolns and

Ben Franklins, and all the animals, both stuffed…

SPARKY: My name is Sparky.

COOPER: … and real.

SCHMOOPSY: Schmoopsy here with a question for the Republican




COOPER: Sadly, Schmoopsy will not be heard from tonight.

The candidates will have 90 seconds to answer the YouTube

questions, the questions that are asked direct to them, 30 seconds for

any follow-up questions that I may ask.

COOPER: There are no lights, no bells, no buzzers, no electric

shocks. We prefer the honor system here. We’ll warn the candidates

when they need to wrap things up.

We also will insist that candidates stay on the question that was

being asked and not stray off to an earlier or another topic.

Americans put a lot of time into submitting these questions. We think

they deserve direct answers.

Finally, tonight we are not in the business of discouraging

applause from our audience here, or passion, but please, if it gets

out of control, we will ask the crowd here to keep it down just a

little bit.

All right, let’s begin.

The governor introduced the candidates.

ANDERSON: He did a very good job of it, but one Republican

wanted to do that also, and he does it in a way that reminds us this

is definitely a new kind of a debate.

Here is Chris Nandor from Snohomish, Washington.

CHRIS NANDOR (SINGING): The grand old party’s looking for

somebody who can lead, someone who is electable and adheres to our


Some say the group is not diverse; they’re white, they’re men,

but wait. The Dems have just one candidate, Republicans have eight.

Rudy’s leading all the polls, but can he win the base?

Mitt changed on abortion; history he can’t erase.

Ron Paul would end the FDA and that is just a start.

Fred has just begun to run, but sure does look the part.

Hunter tells us what to do in foreign policy debates.

Huckabee’s compassionate and lost a lot of weight.

Tancredo says let’s build a fence across the whole Southwest.

McCain is loved by many and hated by the rest.

We don’t know who we’re voting for; we don’t know who will win.

That’s why we use YouTube to ask our questions of these men.

Time is short, we’re voting soon, and I just thought I’d mention.

If we don’t reach consensus, then we’ll decide at convention.


ANDERSON: All right, enough of the singing, enough of the

snowmen. Let’s begin the debate.

From one tough-talking New Yorker, a question to another tough-

talking New Yorker.

ERNIE NARDI: This is Ernie Nardi from Dyker Heights in Brooklyn,

New York, with a question for the ex-Mayor Giuliani.

Under your administration, as well as others, New York City was

operated as a sanctuary city, aiding and abetting illegal aliens.

NARDI: I would like to know, if you become president of the

United States, will you continue to aid and abet the flight of illegal

aliens into this country?

COOPER: Mayor Giuliani?

GIULIANI: Ernie, that was a very good question. And the reality

is that New York City was not a sanctuary city. (OFF-MIKE) single

illegal immigrant that New York City could find that either committed

a crime or was suspected of a crime. That was in the executive order

originally done by Ed Koch, continued by David Dinkins and then done

by me.

The reason for the confusion is, there were three areas in which

New York City made an exception. New York City allowed the children

of illegal immigrants to go to school. If we didn’t allow the

children of illegal immigrants to go to school, we would have had

70,000 children on the streets at a time in which New York City was

going through a massive crime wave, averaging 2,000 murders a year,

10,000 felonies a week.

The other two exceptions related to care — emergency care in the

hospital and being able to report crimes. If we didn’t allow illegals

to report crimes, a lot of criminals would have gone free because

they’re the ones who had the information.

GIULIANI: But, most important point is, we reported thousands

and thousands and thousands of names of illegal immigrants who

committed crimes to the immigration service. They did not deport

them. And what we did, the policies that we had, were necessary

because the federal policies weren’t working.

The federal policies weren’t working, stopping people coming into

the United States. If I were president of the United States, I could

do something about that by deploying a fence, by deploying a virtual

fence, by having a BorderStat system like my COMSTAT system that

brought down crime in New York, and just stopping people from coming

in, and then having a tamper-proof ID card.


Governor Romney, was New York a sanctuary city?

ROMNEY: Absolutely. It called itself a sanctuary city. And as

a matter of fact, when the welfare reform act that President Clinton

brought forward said that they were going to end the sanctuary policy

of New York City, the mayor actually brought a suit to maintain its

sanctuary city status.

ROMNEY: And the idea that they reported any illegal alien that

committed a crime — how about the fact that the people who are here

illegally have violated the law? They didn’t report everybody they

found that was here illegally.


And this happens to be a difference between Mayor Giuliani and

myself and probably others on this stage as well, which is we’re going

to have to recognize in this country that we welcome people here


But the mayor said — and I quote almost verbatim — which is if

you happen to be in this country in an undocumented status — and that

means you’re here illegally — then we welcome you here. We want you

here. We’ll protect you here.

That’s the wrong attitude. Instead, we should say if you’re here

illegally, you should not be here. We’re not going to give you

benefits, other than those required by the law, like health care and

education, and that’s the course we’re going to have to pursue.

COOPER: Mayor Giuliani?

GIULIANI: It’s unfortunate, but Mitt generally criticizes people

in a situation in which he’s had far the — worst record.

For example, in his case, there were six sanctuary cities. He

did nothing about them.

GIULIANI: There was even a sanctuary mansion. At his own home,

illegal immigrants were being employed…


… not being turned into anybody or by anyone. And then when he

deputized the police, he did it two weeks before he was going to leave

office, and they never even seemed to catch the illegal immigrants

that were working at his mansion. So I would say he had sanctuary

mansion, not just sanctuary city.


COOPER: All right. I have to allow Governor Romney to


ROMNEY: Mayor, you know better than that.



ROMNEY: OK, then listen. All right? Then listen. First of


GIULIANI: You did have illegal immigrants working at your

mansion, didn’t you?

ROMNEY: No, I did not, so let’s just talk about that. Are you

suggesting, Mr. Mayor — because I think it is really kind of

offensive actually to suggest, to say look, you know what, if you are

a homeowner and you hire a company to come provide a service at your

home — paint the home, put on the roof. If you hear someone that is

working out there, not that you have employed, but that the company


ROMNEY: If you hear someone with a funny accent, you, as a

homeowner, are supposed to go out there and say, “I want to see your


Is that what you’re suggesting?

GIULIANI: What I’m suggesting is, if you…


GIULIANI: If you’re going to take this holier than thou

attitude, that your whole approach to immigration…

ROMNEY: I’m sorry, immigration is not holier than thou, Mayor.

It’s the law.

GIULIANI: If you’re going to take this holier than thou attitude

that you are perfect on immigration…

ROMNEY: I’m not perfect.

GIULIANI: … it just happens you have a special immigration

problem that nobody else up here has. You were employing illegal

immigrants. That is a pretty serious thing. They were under your




ROMNEY: I ask the mayor again. Are you suggesting, Mayor, that

if you have a company that you hired who provide a service, that you

now are responsible for going out and checking the employees of that

company, particularly those that might look different or don’t have an

accent like yours, and ask for their papers — I don’t think that’s

American, number one.

Number two…

COOPER: We got to move on.

ROMNEY: Let me tell you what I did as governor. I said no to

driver’s licenses for illegals.

I said, number two, we’re going to make sure that those that come

here don’t get a tuition break in our schools, which I disagree with

other folks on that one.


Number three, I applied to have our state police enforce the

immigration laws in May, seven months before I was out of office.

ROMNEY: It took the federal government a long time to get the

approvals and we enforced the law. And Massachusetts is not a

sanctuary state, and the policies of the mayor of pursuing a sanctuary

nation or pursuing a sanctuary city…

COOPER: We’ve got a number…

ROMNEY: … are, frankly, wrong.

COOPER: We’ve got a number of questions from our viewers on this

topic, so we have a lot more to talk about on this. You will have

another chance to respond.


GIULIANI: And it’s really hard — it’s really hard to have

employer sanctions…


COOPER: All right. Let’s play this next video from the same


MICHAEL WEITZ: Good evening. There are thousands of people in

Canada and Mexico waiting to come to America legally. They want to

become American citizens. They want to be part of the American dream.

Yet, there are those in the Senate that want to grant amnesty for

those that come here illegally.

Will you pledge tonight, if elected president, to veto

any immigration bill that involves amnesty for those that have come

here illegally?

Thank you.

COOPER: Senator Thompson?


THOMPSON: Yes, I pledge that. A nation that cannot and will not

defend its own borders will not forever remain a sovereign nation.

And it’s unfair…


We have — we have thousands of people standing in line at

embassies around the world to become United States American citizens,

to come here to get a green card, to come here and to assimilate and

be a part of our culture. They are part of what has made our country

great. Some of our better citizens. We all know them and love them.

Now, it’s our country together — their’s and ours, now together.

It’s our home. And we now get to decide who comes into our home.

And to place somebody above them or in front of them in line is

the wrong thing to do.

THOMPSON: We’ve got to strengthen the border. We’ve got to

enforce the border. We’ve got to punish employers — employers who

will not obey the law. And we’ve got to eliminate sanctuary cities

and say to sanctuary cities, if you continue this, we’re going to cut

off federal funding for you, you’re not going to do it with federal



Now, there are parts of what both of these gentlemen have just

said that I would like to associate myself with.

First of all, of course, Governor Romney supported the Bush

immigration plan until a short time ago. Now he’s taken another

position, surprisingly.


As far as Mayor Giuliani is concerned, I am a little surprised

the mayor says, you know, everybody’s responsible for everybody that

they hire, but we’ll have to address that a little bit further later.

I think we’ve all had people probably that we have hired that in

retrospect probably is a bad decision.


THOMPSON: He did have a sanctuary city. In 1996, I helped pass

a bill outlawing sanctuary cities. The mayor went to court to

overturn it. So, if it wasn’t a sanctuary city, I’d call that a

frivolous lawsuit.


COOPER: All right, because this was a direct…


COOPER: Because this was a direct mention of Mayor Giuliani, we

have to allow you to respond. Thirty seconds, please.

GIULIANI: New York City was not a sanctuary city. New York City

did three exceptions. The three exceptions were to allow children to

go to school, to allow those illegal immigrants who were the victims

of crime to report the person who assaulted them, beat them up, mugged


GIULIANI: And third, to allow emergency care in the hospitals,

which we were required to do by federal law. We had a policy of

reporting every single illegal immigrant other than those three who

commit any kind of crime or were suspected of crime, and we reported

thousands of them to immigration service. Few of them were deported.

COOPER: Senator McCain, let me bring you back to the question

that was asked by the YouTube user. Would you willing to veto any

immigration bill that involved amnesty for those who have come here


MCCAIN: Yes, of course, and we never proposed amnesty. But you

know, this whole debate…

COOPER: Come on, please. Let him answer.

MCCAIN: You know, this whole debate saddens me a little bit

because we do have a serious situation in America. In 1986, we passed

a law that said we would enforce our borders, and gave amnesty to a

couple of million people. We gave the amnesty. Now we have 12

million people and still borders that are not enforced.

MCCAIN: I came to the Senate not to do the easy things, but to

do the hard things. Mel Martinez and I knew this was going to be a

tough issue, but we thought the status quo was unacceptable: broken

borders; 12 million people here illegally; a need for a temporary

worker program, certainly in my state in the agricultural section,

certainly in this state of Florida.

And we tried to get something done. We said we’d enforce the

borders. The American people didn’t believe us. They don’t believe

us because of our failure in Katrina, our failure in Iraq, our

failures in reining in corruption and out of control spending.

So we tried and we failed. And I appreciate the president’s

efforts. He comes from a border state too. And what we’ve learned is

that the American people want the borders enforced. We must enforce

the — secure the borders first.

But then you’ve still got two other aspects of this issue that

have to be resolved as well. And we need to sit down as Americans and

recognize these are God’s children as well.


And they need some protection under the law. And they need some

of our love and compassion.

COOPER: Thank you, Senator.

MCCAIN: And I want to assure you that I’ll enforce the borders

first, that as president of the United States, we’ll solve this

immigration problem. And we won’t demagogue it. And we won’t have

sanctuary cities.


MCCAIN: And we won’t have all this other rhetoric that

unfortunately contributes nothing to the national dialogue.

COOPER: Thank you, Senator.

Michael Weitz who actually asked that question is here in the


Michael, do you feel you got an answer?

WEITZ: Am I happy with the answer?


WEITZ: One yes, one no and one sort of.


COOPER: All right.

Well, let’s — Congressman Tancredo?


Well, I tell you, this has been wonderful. Senator McCain may

not be happy with the spirit of this debate. For a guy who usually

stands on the bookend here, aside, and just listens all the time,

that’s kind of frustrating, you know, in other debates. I have to

tell you, so far, it’s been wonderful.


Because all I’ve heard is people trying to out-Tancredo Tancredo.

TANCREDO: It is great. I am so happy to hear it. It is a

wonderful thing. It’s a good message, yes. We want to secure the


COOPER: Our next question is actually directly to you, so let’s

bring it up.

TANCREDO: Let me go ahead and answer that next question.

JACK BROOKS: Hammered by competition with imports, our family-

owned business struggles each year to find seasonal workers. We’ve

been working with a seasonal guest-worker program, the H2B program,

bringing in and sending home workers every year.

But with Congress failing to enact a comprehensive immigration

and guest worker bill, I want to know whether I’ll have a job next

year. What are you going to do to keep these guest workers coming to

the U.S. to save our business?

COOPER: Congressman Tancredo?

TANCREDO: OK, the gist of the question, as I understand it, is,

what I’m going to do stop guest workers from coming in here?

COOPER: No, no, to help. This small business needs guest


TANCREDO: I’m sorry. I could not hear that. I’m sorry. Well,

I’ll tell you, I’m not going to aid any more immigration into this

country, because in fact, immigration…


… massive immigration into the country, massive immigration,

both legal and illegal, does a couple of things.

TANCREDO: One of it is, makes it difficult for us to assimilate.

The other thing is that it does take jobs.

I reject the idea — I reject the idea, categorically, that there

are jobs that, quote, “No American will take.” I reject it.


Now, what they will do…


… what you can say — what you absolutely can say to these

people is that there are no — there are some jobs Americans won’t

take for what I can get any illegal immigrant to do that job for.

Yes, that’s true.

But am I going to feel sorry if a business has to increase its

wages in order for somebody in this country to make a good living?

No, I don’t feel sorry about that and I won’t apologize for it for a

moment. And there are plenty of Americans who will do those jobs.


COOPER: Congressman Hunter?

HUNTER: Yes. Cooper, a great debate. It’s nice to listen to

lots of statements about what the other candidates will do with

respect to the borders.

HUNTER: I built that border fence in San Diego and it does work.

It’s a…


You know, we built a double fence. We had the number one

smuggler’s corridor in America with most of the illegal aliens and

most of the drugs that came into the entire country coming in through

that number one corridor between Tijuana, Mexico, and San Diego,


We built the double-border fence with a road in between, and we

reduced the smuggling of people and drugs by more than 90 percent.

And as a result of that, the crime rate…


… the crime rate in the city of San Diego went down by 53

percent by FBI statistic. And as a result of that, I wrote the law

that the president signed last October 26, incidentally, passed the

Senate 80-19, that mandates 854 miles of double-border fence across

Arizona, New Mexico and Texas.

Now, the administration has $800 million on hand right now, cash

on hand. They haven’t built a linear inch of that fence in Texas.

HUNTER: As president of the United States, I would bill the

double-border fence, all 854 miles, in six months.

COOPER: Next question is…


HUNTER: That is my commitment.


COOPER: …on immigration as well is going to go to Governor



ASHLEY: Governor Huckabee, while governor of Arkansas, you gave

a illegal aliens a discount for college in Arkansas by allow them to

pay lower in-state tuition rates. However, we have thousands of

military members currently serving our country in Iraq with children

at home. If these children chose to move to Arkansas to attend

college, they would have to pay three times the tuition rate that

illegal aliens pay.

Would you support a federal law which would require any state

that gives these tuition rates to illegal aliens to give the same

rates to the children of our military members?

COOPER: Governor Huckabee, you have 90 seconds.

HUCKABEE: Thank you very much.

Ashley, first of all, let me just express that you’re a little

misinformed. We never passed a bill that gave special privileges to

the children of illegals to go to college.

Now, let me tell you what I did do. I supported the bill that

would’ve allowed those children who had been in our schools their

entire school life the opportunity to have the same scholarship that

their peers had, who had also gone to high school with them and sat in

the same classrooms.

They couldn’t just move in in their senior year and go to

college. It wasn’t about out of state tuition. It was an academic,

meritorious scholarship called the Academic Challenge Scholarship.

Now, let me tell you a couple of provisions of it. And, by the

way, it didn’t pass. It passed the House but got in the Senate and

got caught up in the same kind of controversy that this country is

caught up in.

And here’s what happened. This bill would’ve said that if you

came here, not because you made the choice but because your parents

did, that we’re not going to punish a child because the parent

committed a crime.

HUCKABEE: That’s not what we typically do in this country.

It said that if you’d sat in our schools from the time you’re

five or six-years old and you had become an A-plus student, you’d

completed the core curriculum, you were an exceptional student, and

you also had to be drug and alcohol-free — and the other provision,

you had to be applying for citizenship.

It accomplished two things that we knew we wanted to do, and that

is, number one, bring people from illegal status to legal status.

And the second thing, we wanted people to be taxpayers, not tax-

takers. And that’s what that provision did.

And finally, would we give that provision to the children of

veterans, personally? What we’ve done with not just the children of

veterans, but most importantly, veterans is disgraceful in this


And that’s why I proposed a veterans bill of rights that, if

anything, would give our veterans the most exceptional privileges of

all, because they are the ones who have earned all of our freedom —

every single one of them.

COOPER: Governor, you called Governor Huckabee a liberal on



ROMNEY: Well, you know, I like Mike. And I heard what he just

said. But he basically said that he fought for giving scholarships to

illegal aliens. And he had — he had a great reason for doing so.

It reminds me of what it’s like talking to liberals in

Massachusetts, all right? They have great reasons for taking taxpayer

money and using it for things they think are the right thing to do.

Mike, that’s not your money. That’s the taxpayers’ money.


And the right thing here is to say to people that are here

legally as citizens or legal aliens, we’re going to help you. But if

you’re here illegally, then you ought to be able to return home or get

in line with everybody else. But illegals are not going to get

taxpayer-funded breaks that are better than our own citizens, those

that come from other states or those that come from your state.

COOPER: You have 30 seconds to respond.

HUCKABEE: Well, but they didn’t get something better. They had

to earn it.

And, you know something, I worked my way through college. I

started work when I was 14 and I had to pay my own way through.

HUCKABEE: I know how hard it was to get that degree. I am

standing here tonight on this stage because I got an education. If I

hadn’t had the education, I wouldn’t be standing on this stage. I

might be picking lettuce. I might be a person who needed government

support, rather than who was giving so much money in taxes I want to

get rid of the tax code that we’ve got and make it really different.


HUCKABEE: Mitt, let me finish. Let me finish, Mitt.

In all due respect, we are a better country than to punish

children for what their parents did. We’re a better country than



COOPER: Another question — we have one more question for…

ROMNEY: I get a chance to just respond to that. We are not

punishing children for what their parents did. I respect the fact

that you worked your way through college. That’s the way you are.

That’s wonderful. A lot of people in this country do tremendous

things to get their education. But the question is, are we going to

give taxpayer-funded benefits to kids that are here illegally and put

them ahead of kids that are here legally?

There is only so much money to go around, and…

HUCKABEE: No, there is…

ROMNEY: Let me finish, too.

HUCKABEE: Well, but let’s just be factual.

COOPER: You’ve got 30 seconds. Your time is up.

ROMNEY: There’s only so much money. Are we going to say that

kids that are here illegally are going to get a special deal? Are

they going to get a deal better than other kids? Do they get benefits

by virtue of coming here illegally? And the answer is no.

HUCKABEE: Because they’re earning it. That was the difference.

They had to earn it by their…

COOPER: We’ve got another question from a YouTube watcher.

Let’s watch, please.

YOUTUBE QUESTION: Good evening, candidates. This is (inaudible)

from Arlington, Texas, and this question is for Ron Paul.

I’ve met a lot of your supporters online, but I’ve noticed that a

good number of them seem to buy into this conspiracy theory regarding

the Council of Foreign Relations, and some plan to make a North

American union by merging the United States with Canada and Mexico.

These supporters of yours seem to think that you also believe in

this theory. So my question to you is: Do you really believe in all

this, or are people just putting words in your mouth?

COOPER: Congressman Paul, 90 seconds.

PAUL: Well, it all depends on what you mean by “all of this.”

the CFR exists, the Trilateral Commission exists. And it’s a, quote,

“conspiracy of ideas.” This is an ideological battle. Some people

believe in globalism. Others of us believe in national sovereignty.

And there is a move on toward a North American union, just like

early on there was a move on for a European Union, and it eventually

ended up.

PAUL: And there is a move on toward a North American Union, just

like early on there was a move on for a European Union, and eventually

ended up. So we had NAFTA and moving toward a NAFTA highway. These

are real things. It’s not somebody made these up. It’s not a

conspiracy. They don’t talk about it, and they might not admit about

it, but there’s been money spent on it. There was legislation passed

in the Texas legislature unanimously to put a halt on it. They’re

planning on millions of acres taken by eminent domain for an

international highway from Mexico to Canada, which is going to make

the immigration problem that much worse.

So it’s not so much a secretive conspiracy, it’s a contest

between ideologies, whether we believe in our institutions here, our

national sovereignty, our Constitution, or are we going to further

move into the direction of international government, more U.N.

PAUL: You know, this country goes to war under U.N. resolutions.

I don’t like big government in Washington, so I don’t like this trend

toward international government. We have a WTO that wants to control

our drug industry, our nutritional products. So, I’m against all


But it’s not so much as a sinister conspiracy. It’s just

knowledge is out there. If we look for it, you’ll realize that our

national sovereignty is under threat.

COOPER: Congressman Paul, thank you.


COOPER: We’ve got a question — moving on to another topic, the

economy, money. Next question.

SARAH LEDERACH: My name is Sarah Lederach. I’m 18 years old.

I’m from Scarsdale, Pennsylvania. And I’m a student at Penn State


Often, I’ve heard both politicians and voters express their

concern with providing a better future for their children. A concern

of my generation is the trillions of dollars of national debt and what

kind of responsibility we will have for that in the future.

LEDERACH: My question for you all is, if elected, what measures

will you take to tackle the national debt and control spending?

COOPER: Senator McCain, have Republicans forgotten how to

control spending?

MCCAIN: Absolutely. Absolutely.

When we came to power in 1994, the government…


… changed government and the government changed us.

We let spending lurch completely out of control. We spent $3

million to study the DNA of bears in Montana — I don’t know if that

was a paternity issue or a criminal issue.


We presided over a great expansion of government, the latest

being the SCHIP, which was going to be paid for, supposedly, with a

dollar-a-pack in increase in the tax on a pack of cigarettes.

So, we’re going to help children with their health insurance and

hope that they continue to smoke.


So, I have the record of fighting against wasteful spending. I

have a clear record of winning. I saved the taxpayers $2 billion on a

bogus Air Force Boeing tanker deal, where people went to jail.

MCCAIN: I led in the Abramoff hearings in the — in the obscure

Indian Affairs Committee, for which people are still testifying and

going to jail.

As president of the United States, I’d take an old veto pen that

Ronald Reagan gave me, and I’d veto every single pork barrel bill that

comes across my death. I’d make the authors famous.

And we’ve got to stop it and stop it now. And I can do it. And

I’ve done it. And I’ve got the record.


And I know how Washington works. And I look forward to it.

COOPER: Governor Romney, what would you do to the pork spending?

ROMNEY: Well, the senator is absolutely right. Every bill that

comes forward that’s got pork in it and earmarks that are unnecessary,

we’ve got to veto them and send them back. And that’s a — that’s a

lesson that’s going to have to be done.

But it’s gotta be broader than that. We’re going to have to see

fundamental change in the way Washington works. We’re just — we’re

just not going to get out-of-the-box thinking with inside-the-Beltway


And we’re going to have to fundamentally go at something like our

entitlements and say we’ve got to reform those. I took on a major

issue, which was health care, found a way to get people health

insurance without having to expand government, without having to raise


ROMNEY: We are going to have to after entitlements. We are

going to have to set a cap, as I have proposed, on all nonmilitary

discretionary spending, and inflation less 1 percent. Anything above

that, we veto it.

COOPER: Mayor Giuliani?

GIULIANI: I think you have to across-the-board spending cuts the

way Ronald Reagan did, a 5, 10 percent per civilian agency should be

done right now, actually. President Bush should do it to strengthen

the dollar. We should commit not to rehire half of the civilian

employees that will retire in the next 10 years. That is 42 percent

of the federal workforce that will retire in the next 10 years. Don’t

rehire half of them. Use technology, one person doing the job of two

or three.

Every businses has done it. The government has to do it. And we

should look at those programs. There are about 3 percent of programs

that OMB finds every year are failing. They should be zeroed out.

Twenty-two pecent are found to be not able to be evaluated. They

should be looked at. We need that kind of approach.

COOPER: The next question is going to go to Senator Thompson, as

well as Ron Paul.

EMILY: Hi, I am Emily and I am from Los Angeles.

The Republican Party once stood for limited government, which

meant reduce federal spending because it cost less and we spent less.

EMILY: However, over the past decade, real discretionary federal

spending has in fact increased 40 percent, more than half of which has

been non-defense related.

So my question is: What are the names of the top three federal

programs you would reduce in size in order to decrease…


COOPER: Senator Thompson?

THOMPSON: Well, it’s a target-rich environment, there’s no

question about it. What most of these gentlemen have said absolutely

correct. The difficulty is, most of the programs that we talk about,

most of the ones get the headlines, would not begin to solve the


Mitt’s right when he mentions entitlement. That’s why I have

laid out a program to not attack entitlements, but to save Social

Security. Everybody talks about wanting to do something about it.

Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid are the ones that we’re

really going to have to reform if we’re going to make any headway into


COOPER: So of the top three you would say Social Security?

THOMPSON: No. I didn’t say that. There is — the OMB has come

out with a list of over 100 programs. I would take all 100 of them,

the ones that are full of waste, fraud and duplication. I filed a

report in 2001, when I was chairman of the Governmental Affairs

Committee, and identified billions of dollars that we should be


But my point is that we’re going to have to reform Social

Security, we’re going to have to reform Medicare. I’ve laid out a

detailed plan that will give individual retirement accounts for

people, matched by the government, and also re-index the way benefits

are calculated initially when a person retires. And together, that

program has been said by the experts already — to say that — have

said that it would, after 75 years, make Social Security actuarily


I’ve got the only program out there that really addresses

specifically one of the programs that’s going to have to be reformed.

COOPER: Congressman Paul, the question was three programs.

Can you name three?

PAUL: Yes, and I would like to state that, to the statement

earlier made that we all went to Washington to change Washington and

Washington changed us, I don’t think that applies to me; Washington

did not change me.


I would like to change Washington, and we could by cutting three

programs, such as the Department of Education — Ronald Reagan used to

talk about that — Department of Energy, Department of Homeland

Security is the biggest bureaucracy we ever had.


And besides, what we can do is we can have a stronger national

defense by changing our foreign policy. Our foreign policy is costing

us a trillion dollars, and we can spend most of that or a lot of that

money home if we would bring our troops home.


COOPER: Governor Huckabee, 30 seconds, three programs.

HUCKABEE: Anderson, the first thing that I would get rid of

would be the Internal Revenue Service.


We’d have a complete — getting rid of a $10-billion-a-year



HUCKABEE: I’m not being facetious. If we enacted the fair tax,

one of the most researched ways to revive our economic future…


HUCKABEE: … we will get rid of the IRS. Secondly, I agree we

need to revamp homeland security. It’s a mess, and we have a real

problem with the way that it’s currently structured. And the third…

COOPER: Thirty seconds is up.

HUCKABEE: What’s that?

COOPER: Thirty seconds is up.

HUCKABEE: Oh, OK. Get rid of the IRS, and that would account

for most of the problems. Most people in this country are more afraid

of an audit than they are of a mugging, and there’s a reason why.

COOPER: We’ve got more questions on this topic.



COOPER: This next question is for Senator McCain.

RONALD LANHAM: My name is Ronald Lanham from Mobile, Alabama.

And I want you to tell me, do you support the elimination of the

federal income tax in favor of a national retail sales tax, also known

as the fair tax? Thank you.

COOPER: Governor Huckabee supports it. Do you?

MCCAIN: I do not, and I think we should look very carefully at

it. And I think we should look very carefully at some of the

provisions, which according to The Wall Street Journal would increase

an individual’s tax rate up into the 30s.

MCCAIN: Obviously, we need a simpler, fairer tax code.

Everybody knows that. We need to have a commission that reports out a

credible proposal. And then we do what we do with the base closing

commissions. Congress can’t fool around, they either vote yes or no.

If Congress can’t fix the tax code, give me the job and I’ll fix


I just want to also say that Congressman Paul, I’ve heard him now

in many debates talk about bringing our troops home, and about the war

in Iraq and how it’s failed.


And I want to tell you that that kind of isolationism, sir, is

what caused World War II. We allowed…


We allowed…


COOPER: Allow him his answer. Allow him his answer, please.

MCCAIN: We allowed — we allowed Hitler to come to power with

that kind of attitude of isolationism and appeasement.


MCCAIN: And I want to tell you something, sir. I just finished

having Thanksgiving with the troops, and their message to you is —

the message of these brave men and women who are serving over there

is, “Let us win. Let us…


COOPER: We will — please. We will get to Iraq…


All right. Let me just remind everyone that these people did

take a lot of time to ask these questions, and so we do want direct

questions to — the answers. We will get to Iraq later, but I do

have to allow Congressman Paul 30 seconds to respond.

PAUL: Absolutely. The real question you have to ask is why do I

get the most money from active duty officers and military personnel?


PAUL: What John is saying is just totally distorted.


PAUL: He doesn’t even understand the difference between non-

intervention and isolationism. I am talking isolationism. I am

isolationist. I want to trade with people, talk with people, travel.

But I don’t want to send troops overseas using force to tell them how

to live. We would object to it here and they’re going to object to us

over there.


COOPER: All right. We will have a lot more on Iraq coming up.

It is obviously a very heated topic. Sticking on the economy, though,

a familiar face asking a very simple question.

GROVER NORQUIST: President Bush made a commitment when he ran

for president in 2000 an 2004 that he would oppose and veto any tax

increase that Congress sent him. My question to each of the

candidates is: Would you promise to the people watching this right

now, that you will oppose and veto any efforts to raise taxes as long

as you’re president?

COOPER: I doubt you can do it, but very short answers.

Congressman Tancredo?

TANCREDO: Yes, I can. I have the highest rating, by the way,

from the American Conservative Union of anybody on this stage, and yes

to Grover because he knows I have the highest rating from the

Americans for Tax Reform.


TANCREDO: Thank you very much, Grover. Appreciate it.

COOPER: Governor Huckabee?

HUCKABEE: I would, Anderson. In fact, I signed a pledge to that

effect and would keep that pledge.

COOPER: Governor Romney?

ROMNEY: I’ve signed Grover’s pledge as well. I believe I was

the first person on this stage to do so.

COOPER: Mayor Giuliani?

GIULIANI: Yes, I would. I did it as mayor. I would do it as

the president. I had one of the best records in the country for

lowering taxes while I was mayor. I expect to have a great record as


COOPER: Senator Thompson?

THOMPSON: Cut — tax cuts for eight years when I was in the

United States Senate. Never met a tax I liked. I’ve got a tax-cut

bill on the table. But I don’t do pledges to anybody but the American




COOPER: Senator McCain?

MCCAIN: I have a 24-year record of opposing tax increases and

supporting tax reductions. And, no, I’m like Fred. My pledge and my

record is up to the American people, not up to any other organization.

COOPER: Congressman Paul?

PAUL: I have never voted for a tax increase; never will. But

the tax issue is only one-half of it.

PAUL: You can easily pledge not to raise taxes, but you have to

cut spending.


COOPER: Congressman Hunter?

HUNTER: You know, I came in with Ronald Reagan in 1980 to cut

taxes, and I probably voted for more tax cuts than anybody here.

But you could have an emergency, a time of war, and I think it

would be wrong to say, “Absolutely, I would pledge to Grover Norquist

that I would never raise taxes.” Could have a national emergency.

COOPER: All right, next question.

TED FATUROS: Hi, I’m Ted Faturos from Manhattan Beach,


Mmmmmm, nothing says delicious like cheap corn subsidized by the

American taxpayer. For a lot of Americans, however, a bitter taste is

left in their mouth when they learned about how the U.S. taxpayer

bankrolls billions of dollars in farm subsidies that mostly go to

large item business interests.

I’m curious which candidate could label themselves fiscally

responsiblee, will endorse the elimination of farm subsidies if they

are elected president in 2008.

COOPER: Governor Romney, a lot of folks in Iowa interested in

this answer.


So I hear.

ROMNEY: Not to mention Kansas, Missouri, North Dakota, South

Dakota and so forth. We don’t want to find ourselves, with regards to

our food supply, in the same kind of position we’re in with regards to

our energy supply. And so it’s important for us to make sure that our

farmers are able to stay on the farm and raise the crops that we need

to have a secure source of food. And so I believe in supports that

will allow us to do that.

And the same time, I recognize that we’re also investing in new

technologies to get ourselves energy independent. And I happen to

believe that some of the best sources for having renewable energy come

from the farm. And so we’re investing with subsidies in those areas

to create new technology that otherwise wouldn’t be ready for the

market yet. So I support these programs.

And finally, I’d say this. We have, in our nation, about one out

of three acres that are planted are for sale overseas.

ROMNEY: We send products around the world. We’re competing with

European and Brazilian and other farmers, and we’re competing in a

marketplace where they are heavily subsidized, at great disadvantage

for our farmers. And so, if we’re going to change our support

structure, we want to make sure that they change their support


And we do this together, as opposed to unilaterally saying:

We’re going to put our farmers in a tough position and have the

farmers in the rest of the world continue to be subsidized.

So, open markets, let our goods go around the world and secure

our source of food.

COOPER: Mayor Giuliani, 30 seconds.

GIULIANI: The governor’s right. It isn’t a level playing field.

The subsidies in Europe are far higher than they are in the United

States. We could reduce subsidies here if they would do it there.

But we shouldn’t do it on our own.

And also, we have to be very aware of the fact that we have to

have our own supply of food. We can’t be dependent on foreign

countries for our food.

So, both of those reasons would say that although simplistically,

it might seem like you’d want to get rid of all the subsidies, you’ve

got to do this very carefully, and you have to do it in concert with

these free-trade agreements and other agreements you’re making so that

European countries reduce their much heavier subsidies.

COOPER: Since we’re on fiscal matters, I would be remiss if I

didn’t ask this question, since it did just break a couple hours ago.

This is to Mayor Giuliani. Politico broke a story a few hours ago

questioning your accounting of taxpayer dollars as mayor.

They say that as mayor, the report says you took trips to the

Hamptons and expensed the cost of your police detail to obscure city


COOPER: One, is that true? And, if so, was it appropriate?

GIULIANI: First of all, it’s not true. I had 24-hour security

for the eight years that I was mayor. They followed me everyplace I

went. It was because there were, you know, threats, threats that I

don’t generally talk about. Some have become public recently; most of

them haven’t.

And they took care of me, and they put in their records, and they

handled them in the way they handled them. I had nothing to do with

the handling of their records, and they were handled, as far as I

know, perfectly appropriately.

COOPER: We have asked all the campaigns, we should point out, to

submit 30-second or so campaign-style videos, YouTube-style videos.

It was open to them to do it in any format they wanted.

Our first video — and we’re going to be playing them throughout

the night, some of them out of commercials, some of them during the

program — is from Congressman Tancredo.


TANCREDO: This issue of immigration is one of the most serious

public policy issues we face.


TANCREDO: We have got to actually begin the process of

assimilating people.

CLINTON: They may not talk to you if they think you are also

going to be enforcing the immigration laws.

TANCREDO: We are obfuscating and using words like: Well, I am

not for amnesty, but I am for letting them stay.

CLINTON: Well, I don’t have enough time to tell you all the

mistakes I have made.

TANCREDO: The Republicans can stop this.



COOPER: All right, let’s have our next question from a YouTube


LEEANN ANDERSON: My name is LeeAnn Anderson and I am from

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and these are my kids Evan and May. Maya is

from China and we adopted him to give her a better life. We never

dreamed that she would that she’d be exposed to lead after leaving

China, and now we find trains like this that are covered with lead in

our home.

My question for the candidates are, what are you going to do to

make sure that these kind of toys don’t make their way into our homes

and that we have safe toys that are made in America again and we keep

jobs in America?

COOPER: Congressman Tancredo, you have 90 seconds.

TANCREDO: It is illegal to import that kind of thing. The

problem is, of course, no one really pays a lot of attention to a lot

of our laws, with regard to immigration of both people and, now in

this case, of course, items, goods and services.

I voted against permanent normalized trade relations with China

— this is one reason why. It wasn’t — that was never devised simply

to be a place for us to sell our products; it was devised to be a

place where we could get cheap labor to then import products to the

United States.

So, one of the things you’d have to do, and I certainly would

intend to do, is to change our trade arrangement entirely — with

China, by the way, in particular, but with other countries, as well,

that violate those agreements.

COOPER: Congressman Hunter, you have 30 seconds.


HUNTER: China is cheating on trade, and they’re using that $200

billion trade deficit over the United States to buy ships, planes and

missiles. They are clearly arming.

And it’s in the interest of the United States…


… to stop China’s cheating. My bill, incidentally, that’s up

right now would do that.

But what we all ought to do in this Christmas season, with about

a month to go before Christmas is buy American.

That might hire the young person. That’ll result in a…


You know, that just might keep your neighbor from losing his job,

and it might help that young person coming back from Iraq and

Afghanistan in uniform to have a job when they get back.

Let’s buy American this Christmas season.

COOPER: All right. We’re going to have three commercial breaks

throughout this entire debate. This is the first one. And as we go

to it, we go to another campaign-style video, this one from Senator

Fred Thompson.


ROMNEY: I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this

country. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20

years, that we should sustain and support it.

HUCKABEE: Others have suggested a surcharge on the income tax.

That’s acceptable. I’m fine with that. Others have suggested,

perhaps, a sales tax. That’s fine.


COOPER: Actually, given the nature of that video, we’re not

going to go to break right now.


I think it’s something we should talk about.

Senator Thompson, what’s up with that?


THOMPSON: I just wanted to give my buddies here a little extra




Listen, I mean, what do you mean what’s up with it? These are

their words.

COOPER: OK. I should allow time to respond.

Governor Romney?

ROMNEY: I’m not sure who that young guy was at the beginning of

that film, but I can tell you this, which is, I don’t know how many

times I can tell it. I was wrong. All right. I was effectively pro-

choice when I ran for office.


ROMNEY: If people in this country are looking for someone who’s

never made a mistake on a policy issue and is not willing to admit

they’re ever wrong, why then they’re going to have to find somebody

else, because on abortion I was wrong.


And I changed my mind as the governor. This didn’t just happen

the last couple of weeks or the last year. This happened when I was

governor the first time a bill came to my desk that related to life.

I could not sign a bill that would take away human life. I came down

on the side of life every single instance as governor of

Massachusetts. I was awarded by the Massachusetts Citizens for Life

with their leadership award for my record.

I’m proud to be pro-life, and I’m not going to be apologizing for

people for becoming pro-life.


COOPER: Governor Huckabee, 30 seconds to respond.

HUCKABEE: Well, I was governor nearly 11 years, and in that time

I cut 90 taxes. Over that period of time, the income tax remained

exactly what it was. The sales tax is one penny higher.

But I did do a number of tax cuts that helped a lot of people all

over the place, like eliminating the marriage penalty, doubling the

child care tax credit, getting rid of capital gains on the sale of a

home, cutting capital gains on other things.

HUCKABEE: I have a great record on fiscal conservativism. But

one thing I’ve learned, you know, when you get attacked, it’s not

always bad. It’s like my old pastor used to tell me, when they’re

kicking you in the rear, it’s just proving you’re still out front.


COOPER: I’m sure there’s some campaign chair who might want to

change their videos that they’ve given us after seeing Senator

Thompson’s, but it’s too late to do that. We’re going to take a short

break. We’ll be right back.


JAY FOX: I’m Jay Fox, lifetime member of the NRA. Now, I am

from a small town and as in any small time, we like our big guns. My

question to you is: What is your opinion of gun control? And don’t

worry, you can answer however you like.



COOPER: Congressman Hunter? You have 90 seconds.

HUNTER: Well, first I’ve got to inform Jay that as a guy who got

his first hunting license at the age of 10 and really believes in the

right to keep and bear arms, and used them in the military, as my son

did in Fallujah, you should never throw a gun to a person. He should

have taken that gun handed-off from his fellow hunter. So you have to

be safe with guns, Jay.

But the right to keep and bear arms is an important element of

community security, home security, and national security. I think it

is a tradition of the American soldier.

HUNTER: From Bunker Hill to New Orleans to the rooftops of

Fallujah, the right to keep and bear arms and use them effectively is

an important part of America’s security. And I will strongly enforce

the Second Amendment as president of the United States.

COOPER: All right. On the same topic, another question. Let’s


ANDREW FINK: Hello. My name is Andrew Fink, and I have a

question for Rudy Giuliani.

Mr. Giuliani, at a recent NRA convention, you stated that it’s

every American’s right to be secure. Yet, on March 21 of the year

2000, The Boston Globe quoted you as saying, “Anyone wanting to own a

gun should have to pass a written exam.”

Considering the Constitution grants us the right to bear arms as

a means of protection, why do you believe that citizens should be

required to pass an exam in order to exercise their right to protect

themselves and their families?

FINK: Thank you.

COOPER: Mayor Giuliani, 90 seconds.

GIULIANI: Andrew, what I believe is that we have to be very

aggressive about enforcing the gun laws that exist. I had a city in

which, when I took over, there were 2,000 murders a year, 10,000

felonies a week. And I enforced the gun laws very aggressively.

I enforced all laws very aggressively. And that’s the reason we

reduced shootings by 74 percent. We reduced homicide by 67 percent.

And we went from being one of the most dangerous cities in the country

to being one of the safest.

As far as that’s concerned, what I believe is, the Second

Amendment gives people an individual right to keep and to bear arms.

Government can impose reasonable regulations. Generally, those

reasonable regulations would be about…


COOPER: Let him answer.

GIULIANI: Let me finish. Generally, those reasonable

regulations would be about criminal background, background of mental

instability, basically the ones that are outlined in the opinion of

the judge who wrote the Parker decision, Judge Silverman. And if

those regulations go beyond that, then those are unconstitutional.

GIULIANI: I think states can have a little bit of leeway. New

York could have a somewhat stricter rule than, let’s say, Kentucky.

Texas might have different rules than Ohio. But generally, you’ve got

to comply with this rule.

Now, the Supreme Court’s going to decide this. The Supreme

Court’s going to decide this, probably within the next six months.

The Parker (ph) case has been taken to the Supreme Court. They’re

going to decide whether it’s a right that pertains to the militia —

which I don’t believe it is — or is it a right that is a personal

right. I believe that it is.

And I will live by that. And people will be allowed to have

guns. I’m not going to interfere with that. Generally, decisions are

going to be made on a state basis. And they’re going to have to

comply with the Constitution.

COOPER: Senator Thompson, last week you said that you don’t

think Mayor Giuliani’s ever been a supporter of the Second Amendment.

Why did you say that — 30 seconds.

THOMPSON: Well, the mayor has supported a wide array of gun

control laws. I’m not sure there’s ever one that didn’t come up for

consideration in terms of legislation that he didn’t support —

signing ceremonies with people from President Clinton’s Cabinet and

that sort of thing when they came up.

THOMPSON: The Second Amendment is not a choice thing. I mean,

it’s in the Constitution of the United States — that’s the protection

that the people have against…


The case that the mayor refers to is the Washington D.C. case,

and they were taking the same position, basically, the mayor took, as

far as the city of New York is concerned.

They said, “You know, it will make a safer city if we outlaw law-

abiding citizens having the right to posses a firearm.” It didn’t

make them a safer city.

The D.C. Court of Appeals held that it was a violation of their

Second Amendment rights and, hopefully, the Supreme Court will uphold

the D.C. court.

COOPER: Mayor?

GIULIANI: I agree with the senator that it didn’t make it a

safer city. And some of these gun laws do not make a city a safer


The things we did in New York, indisputably, made New York City a

much safer city. And the law in the District of Columbia and the law

in New York are different.

GIULIANI: The law in the District of Columbia made it impossible

for you to have a firearm. And if New York City went that far, it

should also be declared unconstitutional.

The Second Amendment clearly gives you the right to carry and to

bear arms. In my reading of it, it’s an individual right, and I

believe the Supreme Court will declare that. And that protection

comes from the Constitution, not just a president.

COOPER: Staying on the topic, another question from a viewer.

ERIC BENTSON: Hi there. I’m Eric Bentson from Phoenix, Arizona.

Got a quick question for all you candidates.

Any of you all want to tell us about your gun collection, roughly

how many you own, what your favorite make, model and caliber is, if

any of them require a tax stamp?

COOPER: (OFF-MIKE) if you have a machine gun or a silencer.

Senator Thompson?

THOMPSON: I own a couple of guns, but I’m not going to tell you

what they are or where they are.



COOPER: Senator McCain?

MCCAIN: For a long time I used a lot of guns, including carrying

a .45 as a pilot flying in combat over Vietnam.

MCCAIN: I know how to use guns. I don’t own one now.

COOPER: Congressman Hunter?

HUNTER: I have an old 20-gauge L.C. Smith that is just like the

gun that my dad used to carry when I would walk behind him as a 9-

year-old kid and pick up the shells when he was hunting quail. I

finally got a chance to buy one of those a few years ago, the same gun

that he had had and given to me when I was nine or ten year old when I

bought my first hunting license.

The right to keep and bear arms in the Second Amendment is a

large part protection. It is also a large part family tradition.

COOPER: Is there anyone here besides Senator McCain who does not

own a gun? Mayor Giuliani? Governor Romney?

ROMNEY: I have two guns in my home. They are owned by my son


COOPER: All right, there you have it.

We have another question on a similar topic.

ROMNEY: He buys expensive things for me.

YOUTUBE QUESTION: Hi, this is me and my son Prentiss. We’re

from Atlanta. I want to ask you guys a question (inaudible) every

year. But what about the war going on in our country, black on black

crime? Two hundred to 400 black men die yearly in one city alone.

What are you going to do about that war? It feels like the

(inaudible) is right outside.

COOPER: He’s talking about black on black crime, crime in the

inner cities.

Governor Romney?

ROMNEY: Well, first of all, Printes is pretty fortunate because

he’s got a dad standing next to him that apparently loves him by all

appearances there, and that’s probably the best thing you can do for a

kid is to have a mom and a dad.


And it’s time in this country that we go back to the kind of

values that allow kid to have moms and dads. In the African-American

community today, 68 percent of kids born are born out of wedlock. And

so we’re going to try and once again reinculcate in this country the

try of values that have made us so strong: family values.


COOPER: The question is, what are you going to do about the war

in the inner city?

ROMNEY: Well, one, about the war in the inner city — number one

is to get more moms and dads. That’s number one. And thank heavens

Bill Cosby said it like it was. That’s where the root of crime


Number two, we’ve got to have better education in our schools.

ROMNEY: I think that the civil rights issue of our time is the

failure of inner-city schools to prepare kids in the inner city for

the jobs of tomorrow. And number three, of course, you have to do a

better job with our policing. And I was very proud that I added one

state police class after another.

We had the largest state police in the history of our state

during my term. We put in place tough laws related to drunk driving.

Sex offenders, they have their pictures now posted on the Internet.

We took actions to be tough on crime. And I was pleased that violent

crime in my state during my term reduced by 7 percent.

COOPER: Mayor Giuliani, your campaign manager week called

Governor Romney a mediocre one-term governor. On the issue of

fighting crime, is he a crime fighter?

GIULIANI: The governor has a mixed record in fighting crime.

For example, murder went up by 7.5 percent. Burglary went up. One

other category of violent crime went up. Some categories of violent

crime went down. So, it would be fair to say it’s a mixed record.

The reality is, I had a very strong record in doing precisely

what the young man was asking about. And that is reducing crime in

specifically neighborhoods that would be regarded as poor

neighborhoods, the neighborhoods that had the most crime.

GIULIANI: For example, in Harlem, we reduced crime by about 80

percent. We reduced shootings, overall in the city, by 74 percent.

The city of New York was one of the most dangerous cities in

America, and particularly in the neighborhoods this young man is

worried about, they were really dangerous.

They are not that way anymore and we made the changes with the

CompStat program, the broken windows theory and with very, very good


COOPER: Governor Romney, I have to allow you 30 seconds to


ROMNEY: I think we all recognize that the mayor did a wonderful

job at reducing crime in the City of New York.

I’m not a mayor, I’m not running for a mayor’s job; I didn’t have

a police commissioner. But I did take the actions that I could, as a

state governor, to improve our state police, to strengthen our state

police, to be able to put in place the DNA laboratory — we more than

tripled the size of our DNA laboratory — and did the things we could

to improve crime — our crime enforcement.

ROMNEY: And I’m proud of the fact that we were able to reduce

crime during my tenure.

COOPER: The next topic is abortion.

Next question?

JOURNEY: Hi. My name is Journey. I’m from Texas. And this

question is for all (inaudible) pro-life candidates.

In the event that abortion becomes illegal and a woman obtains an

abortion anyway, what should she be charged with, and what should her

punishment be? What about the doctor who performs the abortion?

COOPER: Congressman Paul, 90 seconds.

PAUL: You know, it’s not a federal function to determine the

penalties for a crime of abortion if it’s illegal in a state. It’s up

to the state, it’s up to the juries. And it should be up to

discretion because it’s not an easy issue to deal with. But the first

thing we have to do is get the federal government out of it. We don’t

need a federal abortion police. That’s the last thing that we need.


But for the…

COOPER: Should a woman be charged with a crime?

PAUL: Pardon me?

COOPER: Should a woman be charged with a crime?

PAUL: I don’t personally think so. I’m an O.B. doctor, and I

practiced medicine for 30 years, and I of course never saw one time

when a medically necessary abortion had to be done.

PAUL: But so I think it certainly is a crime. But I also

understand the difficulties. I think when you’re talking about third

trimester deliberate abortion and partial birth abortions, I mean,

there has to be a criminal penalty for the person that’s committing

that crime. But I really think it’s the person who commits the crime.

And I think that is the abortionist.

COOPER: So you’re saying a doctor should be punished.

What sort of punishment should they get?

PAUL: Well, I think it’s up to the states. I’m not in the state

— I’m not running for governor. And I think it’s different, and I

don’t think it should be all 50 states the same way. So, I don’t

think that should be up to the president to decide that.

COOPER: Senator Thompson?

THOMPSON: Yes. The young lady’s question is…


… the young lady’s question is premised on if abortion becomes

illegal. That presumes Roe v. Wade is overturned, which I think

should be our number one focus right now. And that has to do with the

kind of Supreme Court justices we put on the bench.


I’m getting there. I’m getting there.

THOMPSON: That would mean that it goes back to the states, and

then the states would have to outlaw it at an earlier stage than they

outlaw it now. Then the question would be, who gets penalized and

what should the penalty be.

I think it should be fashioned along the same lines it is now.

Most states have abortion laws pertain and prohibit abortion after

viability. It goes to the doctor performing the abortion, not the

girl, or the young girl, or her parents, whoever it might be. I think

that same pattern needs to be followed. It could just be moved up

earlier, or much earlier in the process if the state so determined.

COOPER: Another question.

QUESTIONER: Hello, my name is AJ. I’m from Millstone, New

Jersey. I would all of the candidates to give an answer on this. If

hypothetically, Roe v. Wade was overturned, and the Congress passed a

federal ban on all abortions and it came to your desk, would you sign

it? Yes or no?

COOPER: Mayor Giuliani?

GIULIANI: If Congress passed a ban on all abortions throughout

the United States?

COOPER: If Roe v. Wade was overturned and Congress passed a

federal ban on all abortions and it came to your desk, would you sign

it, yes or no?

GIULIANI: I probably would not sign it. I would leave it to the

states to make that decision.


I think that that — the problem with Roe against Wade is that it

took the decision away from the states. If Roe against Wade were

overturned because it was poorly decided, if the justices decide that,

it would them go back to the states, and it would seem to me that that

would be the answer.

The answer is that each state would make a different decision. I

don’t believe, in the circumstance that you asked before, that it

should be criminalized. I think that would be a mistake unless we’re

talking about partial birth abortion or late-term abortion.

I think you should have parental consent. I think we should have

access to adoptions instead of abortion. But, ultimately, I think

these decisions should be made on a state-by-state basis.

COOPER: Governor Romney?

ROMNEY: I agree with Senator Thompson, which is we should

overturn Roe v. Wade and return these issues to the states.

ROMNEY: I would welcome a circumstance where there was such a

consensus in this country that we said, we don’t want to have abortion

in this country at all, period. That would be wonderful. I’d be


COOPER: The question is: Would you sign that bill?

ROMNEY: Let me say it. I’d be delighted to sign that bill. But

that’s not where we are. That’s not where America is today. Where

America is is ready to overturn Roe v. Wade and return to the states

that authority. But if the Congress got there, we had that kind of

consensus in that country, terrific.

COOPER: All right. The next question is for Governor Huckabee.

Let’s listen.

TYLER OVERMAN: Hi. This is Tyler Overman from Memphis,

Tennessee. And I have a quick question for those of you who would

call yourselves Christian conservatives. The death penalty, what

would Jesus do?

COOPER: Governor Huckabee?

HUCKABEE: You know, one of the toughest challenges that I ever

faced as a governor was carrying out the death penalty. I did it more

than any other governor ever had to do it in my state. As I look on

this stage, I’m pretty sure that I’m the only person on this stage

that’s ever had to actually do it.

HUCKABEE: Let me tell you, it was the toughest decision I ever

made as a human-being. I read every page of every document of every

case that ever came before me, because it was the one decision that

came to my desk that, once I made it, was irrevocable.

Every other decision, somebody else could go back and overturn,

could fix if it was a mistake. That was one that was irrevocable.

I believe there is a place for a death penalty. Some crimes are

so heinous, so horrible that the only response that we, as a civilized

nation, have for a most uncivil action is not only to try to deter

that person from ever committing that crime again, but also as a

warning to others that some crimes truly are beyond any other capacity

for us to fix.


Now, having said that, there are those who say, “How can you be

pro-life and believe in the death penalty?”

Because there’s a real difference between the process of

adjudication, where a person is deemed guilty after a thorough

judicial process and is put to death by all of us, as citizens, under

a law, as opposed to an individual making a decision to terminate a

life that has never been deemed guilty because the life never was

given a chance to even exist.

COOPER: Governor?

HUCKABEE: That’s the fundamental difference.


COOPER: I do have to though press the question, which — the

question was, from the viewer was? What would Jesus do? Would Jesus

support the death penalty?

HUCKABEE: Jesus was too smart to ever run for public office,

Anderson. That’s what Jesus would do.


COOPER: Congressman Tancredo, 30 seconds.

TANCREDO: The question is: What would Jesus do? Well, I’ll

tell you this. I would pray to him for the wisdom and the courage to

do the right thing. And I believe that with prayer, he would give it

to me.

TANCREDO: And I believe that justice was done in the situations

that the governor has explained. And, as I say, I look to him for

guidance in all those kinds of situations.

COOPER: Time. A similar question. Let’s watch.

JOSEPH: I am Joseph. I am from Dallas, Texas, and how you

answer this question will tell us everything we need to know about

you. Do you believe every word of this book? Specifically, this book

that I am holding in my hand, do you believe this book?

COOPER: I think we’ve got a question.

Mayor Giuliani?

HUCKABEE: Do I need to help you out, Mayor, on this one?



GIULIANI: Wait a second, you’re the minister. You’re going to

help me out on this one.

HUCKABEE: I’m trying to help you out.

GIULIANI: OK. The reality is, I believe it, but I don’t believe

it’s necessarily literally true in every single respect.

GIULIANI: I think there are parts of the Bible that are

interpretive. I think there are parts of the Bible that are

allegorical. I think there are parts of the Bible that are meant to

be interpreted in a modern context.

So, yes, I believe it. I think it’s the great book ever written.

I read it frequently. I read it very frequently when I’ve gone

through the bigger crises in my life, and I find great wisdom in it,

and it does define to a very large extent my faith. But I don’t

believe every single thing in the literal sense of Jonah being in the

belly of the whale, or, you know, there are some things in it that I

think were put there as allegorical.

COOPER: Governor Romney?

ROMNEY: I believe the Bible is the word of God, absolutely. And

I try…


… I try to live by it as well as I can, but I miss in a lot of

ways. But it’s a guide for my life and for hundreds of millions,

billions of people around the world. I believe in the Bible.

COOPER: Does that mean you believe every word?

ROMNEY: You know — yes, I believe it’s the word of God, the

Bible is the word of God.

ROMNEY: The Bible is the word of God. I mean, I might interpret

the word differently than you interpret the word, but I read the Bible

and I believe the Bible is the word of God. I don’t disagree with the

Bible. I try to live by it.

COOPER: Governor Huckabee?

HUCKABEE: Sure. I believe the Bible is exactly what it is.

It’s the word of revelation to us from God himself.


And the fact is that when people ask do we believe all of it, you

either believe it or you don’t believe it. But in the greater sense,

I think what the question tried to make us feel like was that, well,

if you believe the part that says “Go and pluck out your eye,” well,

none of us believe that we ought to go pluck out our eye. That

obviously is allegorical.

But the Bible has some messages that nobody really can confuse

and really not left up to interpretation. “Love your neighbor as


HUCKABEE: And as much as you’ve done it to the least of these

brethren, you’ve done it unto me. Until we get those simple, real

easy things right, I’m not sure we ought to spend a whole lot of time

fighting over the other parts that are a little bit complicated.

And as the only person here on the stage with a theology degree,

there are parts of it I don’t fully comprehend and understand, because

the Bible is a revelation of an infinite god, and no finite person is

ever going to fully understand it. If they do, their god is too


COOPER: We’ve got a lot more coming up. We’re going to take a

short break, and as we go to the break, we’ll watch a video, this time

from the campaign of Governor Romney.


ANNOUNCER: It’s an election like no other. An enemy lurks,

waiting to strike. Our Main Street economy is competing with mainland

China. Legal versus illegal doesn’t seem to matter. Basic values

like marriage are suddenly open to debate.

For these challenges, ordinary isn’t good enough. We need the

leader who gets the big stuff done. Take charge, demand results, no

excuses. Mitt Romney, the right experience, the right values, the

right time.

ROMNEY: I’m Mitt Romney, and I approve this message.




ANNOUNCER: As mayor of New York, Rudy Giuliani faced unheard of

challenges: runaway taxes, out of control crime, and, of course, the

city’s nemesis, King Kong.

Yet, Rudy prevailed. Crime down by half, taxes cut, and annual

snowfall dramatically reduced.

Time called Rudy person of the year. Newsweek — the new mayor

of America. And when asked, Hillary Clinton called him — but she

probably planted the question.




COOPER: That was the campaign commercial by the Giuliani

campaign. Obviously, we are playing these commercials all throughout

this two-hour debate.

COOPER: Let’s go to our next topic, which is foreign policy.

Our first question:

YASMIN: Good evening, gentlemen. My name is Yasmin and I hail

from Huntsville, Alabama.

My question has to do with the current crisis in Iraq, as well as

the U.S. efforts in Afghanistan.

After living abroad, personally, in the Middle East for a year, I

realized just how much damage the Iraq war and the perception of

invasion has done to the image of America. What would you do as

president to repair the image of America in the eyes of the Muslim


COOPER: Mayor Giuliani, 90 seconds?

GIULIANI: Well, the most important thing to do is to make

certain we remain on offense against Islamic terrorism.


And then make it clear that what that means is this is a small

group of people, Islamic terrorists, who have defiled a great

religion, that the vast majority of people who are Islamic, the vast

majority of people who are Arabs, the vast majority of people living

in these countries are good people. We should be trading with them.

We should have contact with them. We should expand our contacts with

them. We should have cultural exchanges with them.

The night of September 11th, 2001, when we were beginning to

recover — or, not really recover, but maybe just first catch our

breath after the attack of September 11th, you’ll see one of the first

things I said was I said to the people of my city and then probably to

the people of America that we should not engage in group blame.

GIULIANI: We shouldn’t do the thing that we’re being attacked

for. We shouldn’t blame an entire group of people for the horrible

acts of a few people who have distorted a great religion. They have

turned it into an ideology of hatred and an ideology of violence.

By the same token, we can’t do what the Democrats do. We can’t

put our head in the sand. You’ve got a Democratic debate and not a

single one of those Democratic candidates used the word “Islamic

terrorism.” I don’t know who they think they’re offending. The

people they’re offending are the people we want to offend — the

Islamic terrorists…


… and not decent people like Yasmin. We are intelligent enough

and good enough as Americans to make this distinction.

COOPER: Senator McCain?

MCCAIN: Well, I would do a lot of things, but the first and most

important and vital element is to continue this surge which is

succeeding and we are winning the war in Iraq.


That’s the first thing I would do. I would make sure that we do

what we can to help reconstruct the country, to help the Maliki

government move forward as rapidly as possible to train the police.

MCCAIN: But I’ll tell you one other thing we’re — I’m going to

do, is we’re going to fight back the Democrats’ efforts to set a date

for withdrawal which is a date for surrender.


Now, my friends, I’m the only one on this stage — I’m the only

one on this stage — that said that the Rumsfeld strategy was failing

and was doomed to failure. I’m the only one on this stage that said

we’ve got to have a new strategy, and that’s the strategy we’re

employing now.

And I got a lot of heat when I said that that strategy was

failing and it had to be changed, because I’ve had the experience and

the background and the knowledge of every national security issue

we’ve faced in the last 20 years.

And I’m telling you, that if we continue this strategy, we can

succeed. And if we had done what the Democrats said to do six months

ago, Al Qaida would be telling the word they beat America.


MCCAIN: There’s a lot at stake here, my friends, and thank God

for the young men and women who are sending the message I repeat to

you again, after having been there over Thanksgiving weekend, let me

win, let us win.


COOPER: Thirty seconds, Congressman Hunter. The question is,

how do you repair the image of America in the Muslim world?

HUNTER: Cooper, Cooper, very simply, to the critics of America I

would say this. When you were faced with disease and starvation, the

Americans brought food and medicine. When you had earthquakes and

tsunamis and floods, the Americans came and helped you. And when you

were threatened from outside, the Americans left the safety of their

own homes to come and defend you.

I will never apologize for the United States of America.


COOPER: Our next question — our next question comes from

Seattle, Washington.

ANDREW JONES: Hello, gentlemen. I’m Andrew, and I’m a college

student from Seattle, Washington.

JONES: Recently, Senator McCain has come out strongly against

using waterboarding as an instrument of interrogation.

My question for the rest of you is, considering that Mr. McCain

is the only one with any firsthand knowledge on the subject, how can

those of you sharing the stage with him disagree with his position?

COOPER: Governor Romney?

ROMNEY: Well, he certainly is an expert and I certainly would

want to get his counsel on a matter of this nature, but I do not

believe that as a presidential candidate, it is wise for us to

describe precisely what techniques we will use in interrogating


I oppose torture. I would not be in favor of torture in any way,

shape or form.

COOPER: Is waterboarding torture?

ROMNEY: And as I just said, as a presidential candidate, I don’t

think it’s wise for us to describe specifically which measures we

would and would not use.

And that is something which I would want to receive the counsel

not only of Senator McCain, but of a lot of other people.

And there are people who, for many, many years get the

information we need to make sure that we protect our country.

ROMNEY: And, by the way, I want to make sure these folks are

kept at Guantanamo. I don’t want the people that are carrying out

attacks on this country to be brought into our jail system and be

given legal representation in this country. I want to make sure that

what happened…


… to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed happens to other people who are

terrorists. He was captured. He was the so-called mastermind of the

9/11 tragedy. And he turned to his captors and he said, “I’ll see you

in New York with my lawyers.” I presume ACLU lawyers.


Well, that’s not what happened. He went to Guantanamo and he met

G.I.s and CIA interrogators. And that’s just exactly how it ought to



COOPER: Senator McCain?


(UNKNOWN): There were reports Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was


MCCAIN: Well, Governor, I’m astonished that you haven’t found

out what waterboarding is.

ROMNEY: I know what waterboarding is, Senator.

MCCAIN: Then I am astonished that you would think such a — such

a torture would be inflicted on anyone in our — who we are held

captive and anyone could believe that that’s not torture. It’s in

violation of the Geneva Convention. It’s in violation of existing



And, Governor, let me tell you, if we’re going to get the high

ground in this world and we’re going to be the America that we have

cherished and loved for more than 200 years. We’re not going to

torture people.

MCCAIN: We’re not going to do what Pol Pot did. We’re not going

to do what’s being done to Burmese monks as we speak. I suggest that

you talk to retired military officers and active duty military

officers like Colin Powell and others, and how in the world anybody

could think that that kind of thing could be inflicted by Americans on

people who are held in our custody is absolutely beyond me.

COOPER: Governor Romney, 30 seconds to respond.


ROMNEY: Senator McCain, I appreciate your strong response, and

you have the credentials upon which to make that response. I did not

say and I do not say that I’m in favor of torture.

ROMNEY: I am not. I’m not going to specify the specific means

of what is and what is not torture so that the people that we capture

will know what things we’re able to do and what things we’re not able

to do. And I get that advice from Cofer Black, who is a person who

was responsible for counterterrorism in the CIA for some 35 years.

I get that advice by talking to former generals in our



ROMNEY: … and I don’t believe it’s appropriate for me, as a

presidential candidate, to lay out all the issues one by one…


ROMNEY: … get questioned one by one: Is this torture, is that


COOPER: Senator McCain…

ROMNEY: And so, that’s something which I’m going to take your

and other people’s counsel on.

COOPER: Senator McCain, 30 seconds to respond.

MCCAIN: Well, then you would have to advocate that we withdraw

from the Geneva Conventions, which were for the treatment of people

who were held prisoners, whether they be illegal combatants or regular

prisoners of war. Because it’s clear the definition of torture. It’s

in violation of laws we have passed.

And again, I would hope that we would understand, my friends,

that life is not “24” and Jack Bauer.

MCCAIN: Life is interrogation techniques which are humane and

yet effective. And I just came back from visiting a prison in Iraq.

The Army general there said that techniques under the Army Field

Manual are working and working effectively, and he didn’t think they

need to do anything else.

My friends, this is what America is all about. This is a

defining issue and, clearly, we should be able, if we want to be

commander in chief of the U.S. Armed Forces, to take a definite and

positive position on, and that is, we will never allow torture to take

place in the United States of America.


COOPER: Staying on this issue, let’s watch.

BUZZ BROCKWAY: Hello. My name is Buzz Brockway from

Lawrenceville, Georgia. All the talk about the war in Iraq centers

around how quickly we can get out. I think that’s the wrong question.

We need to make a permanent or long-term military commitment to the


By staying in Iraq, we provide long-term stability to the region,

we provide support for our allies, and we act as a deterrent to the

trouble-makers in the region. Which presidential candidate will make

a permanent of long-term military commitment to the people of Iraq?

BROCKWAY: Thank you.

COOPER: Senator Thompson?

THOMPSON: We shouldn’t be in there longer than necessary, and we

don’t know how long that will be. But we should be there absolutely

as long as it takes to complete our mission there. It will make for a

safer United States of America.

We’re all focused, understandably, on Iraq and Afghanistan right

now, but it is part of a much bigger picture. Islamic terrorism has

declared war on us and Western civilization. They would like nothing

better than to kill millions of people as they bring us down. They

would like to be able to advertise to young radicals around the world

that, “You, too, could help bring down the United States of America.”

Iran is waiting there to fill that vacuum. You think $90, $100 a

barrel is high for oil now, wait until that happens.

But more importantly, it would make for a less secure United

States of America. We have to do what’s necessary. We have to take

the opportunity that we have now.

John’s absolutely right. What’s going on there is progress; it’s

called progress.

THOMPSON: Too many people in this country are vested in a

scenario of defeat. I’m vested in a scenario of victory and I see it

happening there in Iraq today.


COOPER: Congressman Paul, 30 seconds.

PAUL: The best commitment we can make to the Iraqi people is to

give them their country back. That’s the most important thing that we

can do.


Already, part of their country has been taken back. In the

south, they claim the surge has worked, but the surge really hasn’t

worked. There’s less violence, but al-Sadr has essentially won in the


The British are leaving. The brigade of Al Sadr now is in

charge, so they are getting their country back. They’re in charge up

north — the Shia — the people in the north are in charge, as well,

and there’s no violence up there or nearly as much.

So, let the people have their country back again. Just think of

the cleaning up of the mess after we left Vietnam. Vietnam now is a

friend of ours — we trade with them, the president comes here.

What we achieved in peace was unachievable in 20 years of the

French and the Americans being in Vietnam.

PAUL: So it’s time for us to take care of America first.


COOPER: Senator McCain?

MCCAIN: Well, let me remind you, Congressman, we never lost a

battle in Vietnam. It was American public opinion that forced us to

lost that conflict.


I think it’s important for all Americans to understand the

fundamental difference. After we left Vietnam, they didn’t want to

follow us home. They wanted to build their own workers’ paradise. If

you read Zarqawi, if you read bin Laden, if you read Zawahiri, read

what they say. They want to follow us home. They want Iraq to be a

base for Al Qaida to launch attacks against the United States. Their

ultimate destination is not Iraq.

MCCAIN: Their ultimate destination is New York City, Washington,

D.C., Chicago and Phoenix, Arizona. This is a transcendent challenge

of our time.


MCCAIN: I believe that we can meet it and we will defeat it.


COOPER: Congressman Paul, I know — we’ll get everyone in on

this. Congressman Paul, just wanted to allow you to respond.

PAUL: Shortly after the Vietnam War ended, Colonel Tu and

Colonel Summers met, and they were talking about this. And our — and

the American colonel said, “You know, we never lost one battle.” And

Colonel Tu, the Vietnamese says, “Yes, but that’s irrelevant.”

And it is irrelevant. But we have to realize why they want to

come here. Wolfowitz even admitted that one of the major reasons that

the Al Qaida was organized and energized was because of our military

base in Saudi Arabia.

PAUL: He says, “Oh, now, we can take the base away.” He

understood why they came here. They come here because we’re occupying

their country, just as we would object if they occupied our country.


COOPER: Well, it’s Congressman Tancredo. And we’re running

short on time. So, please, let’s try to get to these.

You have 30 seconds.

TANCREDO: I wish that we lived in the world that Ron is

describing — I wish that we lived in a world where we did not have to

worry. By simply removing our forces, we would be safe.

Unfortunately, Ron, honest to God, I don’t believe that that is

the case. We are living in a world where we are threatened. It is

radical Islam.


It is — the ideology, the political and religious ideology of

radical Islam is a threat to America, and it would be a threat to

America if we never had a single person serving anywhere outside this


COOPER: We’ve got another question for Mayor Giuliani.

SAM GARCIA: Hi. My name is Sam Garcia.

GARCIA: I’m from Colorado Springs, Colorado. The following

question is for Rudy Giuliani. Mr. Giuliani, a while back, a friend

and I were having a discussion about you and some of the other

Republican candidates.

He blatantly made this statement somewhere along the line: Rudy

Giuliani is using September 11, 2001, to propel himself into the White

House. My question to you is: How do you respond to this accusation

and other accusations similar to it?

COOPER: Ninety seconds.

GIULIANI: Sam, what I say is, I would like people to look at my

whole record. Long before September 11, 2001, I was the third-ranking

official in the Reagan justice department.

During that period of time, I actually did something about

illegal immigration. I played a large part in stopping the Haitian

illegal immigration into south Florida. I negotiated the agreement

with the Haitian government that allowed us to put a Coast Guard

cutter in the waters outside Port-au-Prince, as well as the legal

agreements that were necessary to do the examinations there.

GIULIANI: And this terrible problem that was going on that was

also leading to the loss of life was ended, or at least ameliorated


I was United States attorney in the Southern District of New

York. I prosecuted thousands of organized crimes figures. I

prosecuted Sicilian Mafia members, never done before in an American


I was mayor of a city that was described as one of the greatest

turnarounds of any city in the history of America. George Will said I

ran the most conservative government in this country, most successful

conservative government in this country in the last 50 or 60 years.

This is all before September 11th, 2001. I reduced taxes. I reduced

spending. I reduced welfare. I reduced abortions, increased


These are all things that I did before September 11, 2001. And

the reason that I believe I’m qualified to be president of the United

States is not because of September 11th, 2001. It’s because I’ve been

tested. I’ve been tested in a way in which I ran the third-largest

government in this country, the 17th-largest economy in the world, and

I got very, very remarkable results.

And that is the evaluation of other people, not me.

COOPER: All right. We’ve got a question…


Definitely a reminder this is a YouTube/CNN debate. Let’s watch.


grant your vice president as much power and influence as I’ve had?

And remember, before you answer, I’m watching you.


COOPER: Funny video, serious question.

Senator Thompson, would you have a vice president…

THOMPSON: First of all, I’m greatly relieved. For a second

there, I thought that was me.


COOPER: The power of the vice president.

THOMPSON: I think that the vice president, of course, has a dual

role. He has a place in the executive branch of government. He also

presides over the Senate, so he has a place in the legislative branch


But a vice president ought to be chosen, basically, on his

ability to serve as president of the United States, if that situation

were called for.

THOMPSON: Therefore, he needs to be brought into the

administration. I think that a vice president ought to have

substantial authority; I think especially on national security areas.

Expertise in that area is especially beneficial to a president who is

having to deal with all the issues a president has to deal with, but

certainly some expertise either in the domestic area or the national

security area.

Some legal training also might be helpful. I think one of the

most important things that we’re going to be facing for this next

president is the selection of United States judges to the Supreme

Court. So I think that all those are things that you have to take

into consideration in deciding what kind of authority the vice

president should have.

Basically, he should have the authority that the president gives

him, and he should adhere to that authority.

COOPER: Senator McCain, has this president given too much

authority to the vice president?

MCCAIN: Look, I am going to give you some straight talk. This

president came to office in a time of peace, and then we found

ourselves in 2001.

MCCAIN: And he did not have as much national security experience

as I do. So he had to rely more on the vice president of the United

States, and that’s obvious. I wouldn’t have to do that. I might have

to rely on a vice president that I select on some other issues. He

may have more expertise in telecommunications, on information

technology, which is the future of this nation’s economy. He may have

more expertise in a lot of areas.

But I would rely on a vice president of the United States — but

was Fred said, the primary responsibility is to select one who will

immediately take your place is necessary. But the vice president of

the United States is a key and important issue, and must add in

carrying out the responsibilities of the president of the United


COOPER: We’ve got a short break, our last break of the debate.

We’ll watch a video, this one from the Hunter campaign, as we go to



GENERAL CHUCK YAEGER (USAF-RET.): Yes, I’m General Chuck Yaeger,

retired Air Force, and I support Duncan Hunter for president of the

United States.

ANNOUNCER: Duncan Hunter — he built the border fence between

California and Mexico. As chairman of the House Armed Services

Committee, he kept our military strong and kept defense jobs in

America. And when liberal judges tried to take down the Veterans’

Memorial, Duncan Hunter’s bill saved it.

For a real conservative for president, join our team now.


HUNTER: I’m Duncan Hunter, and I approved this message.




HUCKABEE: Faith doesn’t just influence me. It really defines

me. I don’t have to wake up every day wondering what do I need to


Let us never sacrifice our principles for anybody’s politics.

Not now, not ever.

HUCKABEE: I believe life begins at conception.

We believe in some things. We stand by those things. We live or

die by those things.

I’m Mike Huckabee, and I approve this message.


COOPER: A campaign commercial from the Huckabee campaign. 11:00

tonight eastern time on CNN Campbell Brown has a one-hour special, a

“Broken Government” special called “Campaign Special.”

It’s about attack ads. It’s an interesting show starting at

11:00 East Coast time tonight.

All right, let’s get back to the debate. Another question from a

YouTube viewer. Let’s watch.

BRIGADIER GENERAL KEITH KERR (RET.): My name’s Keith Kerr, from

Santa Rosa, California. I’m a retired brigadier general with 43 years

of service. And I’m a graduate of the Special Forces Officer Course,

the Commanding General Staff Course and the Army War College. And I’m

an openly gay man.

I want to know why you think that American men and women in

uniform are not professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians.

COOPER: I want to point out that Brigadier General Keith Kerr is

here with us tonight. I’m glad you’re here.


Again, the question to Congressman Hunter.

HUNTER: General, thanks for your service, but I believe in what

Colin Powell said when he said that having openly homosexual people

serving in the ranks would be bad for unit cohesion.

The reason for that, even though people point to the Israelis and

point to the Brits and point to other people as having homosexuals

serve, is that most Americans, most kids who leave that breakfast

table and go out and serve in the military and make that corporate

decision with their family, most of them are conservatives.

They have conservative values, and they have Judeo-Christian

values. To force those people to work in a small tight unit with

somebody who is openly homosexual goes against what they believe to be

their principles, and it is their principles, is I think a disservice

to them. I agree with Colin Powell that it would be bad for unit



COOPER: I want to direct this to Governor Huckabee.

Thirty seconds.

HUCKABEE: The Uniform Code of Military Justice is probably the

best rule, and it has to do with conduct. People have a right to have

whatever feelings, whatever attitudes they wish, but when their

conduct could put at risk the morale, or put at risk even the cohesion

that Duncan Hunter spoke of, I think that’s what is at issue. And

that’s why our policy is what it is.

COOPER: Governor Romney, you said in 1994 that you looked

forward to the day when gays and lesbians could serve, and I quote,

“openly and honestly in our nation’s military.” Do you stand by that?

ROMNEY: This isn’t that time. This is not that time. We’re in

the middle of a war. The people who have…

COOPER: Do you look forward to that time, though, one day?

ROMNEY: I’m going to listen to the people who run the military

to see what the circumstances are like. And my view is that, at this

stage, this is not the time for us to make that kind of…

COOPER: Is that a change in your position…

ROMNEY: Yes, I didn’t think it would work. I didn’t think

“don’t ask/don’t tell” would work. That was my — I didn’t think that

would work. I thought that was a policy, when I heard about it, I

laughed. I said that doesn’t make any sense to me.

ROMNEY: And you know what? It’s been there now for, what, 15

years? It seems to have worked.

COOPER: So, just so I’m clear, at this point, do you still look

forward to a day when gays can serve openly in the military or no


ROMNEY: I look forward to hearing from the military exactly what

they believe is the right way to have the right kind of cohesion and

support in our troops and I listen to what they have to say.


COOPER: All right. General Kerr is — as I said — is here.

Please stand up, General. Thank you very much for being with us.

Did you feel you got an answer to your question?

KERR: With all due respect, I did not get an answer from the



COOPER: What do you feel you did not…

KERR: American men and women in the military are professional

enough to serve with gays and lesbians.

For 42 years, I wore the army uniform on active duty, in the

Reserve, and also for the state of California. I revealed I was a gay

man after I retired.

Today, “don’t ask/don’t tell” is destructive to our military


KERR: Every day, the Department of Defense discharges two

people, not for misconduct, not for the unit cohesion…

COOPER: Wait, the mike is — you’ve lost me. Is the microphone

not working? Please, just finish your — what is your question?

KERR: Not for the unit cohesion that Congressman Hunter is

talking about, but simply because they happen to be gay.

COOPER: OK. Senator McCain…

KERR: And we’re talking about doctors, nurses, pilots, and the

surgeon who sews somebody up when they’re taken from the battlefield.

COOPER: I appreciate your comments.

Senator McCain, I want to give you 30 seconds. You served in the


MCCAIN: General, I thank you for your service to our nation. I

respect it. All the time, I talk to our military leaders, beginning

with our joint chiefs of staff and the leaders in the field, such as

General Petraeus and General Odierno and others who are designated

leaders with the responsibility of the safety of the men and women

under their command and their security and protect them as best they


Almost unanimously, they tell me that this present policy is

working, that we have the best military in history, that we have the

bravest, most professional, best prepared, and that this policy ought

to be continued because it’s working.

COOPER: All right. We’ve got another question. Let’s listen.

DAVID CERCONE: Hi, my name is David Cercone. I’d like to ask

all the candidates if they accept the support of the Log Cabin

Republicans, and why should the Log Cabin Republicans support their


COOPER: Governor Huckabee, would you support — would you allow

support from the Log Cabin Republicans, a group of gay Republicans?

HUCKABEE: You know, in my position in this entire election, I

need the support of anybody and everybody I can get.



HUCKABEE: Sure, they should. I disagree with them, strongly

disagree with them on the idea of same-sex marriage, but in a

democracy we can have disagreements over some policies and still agree

on the greater things that make us Republicans.

So would I accept their support? Of course. Would I change my

position on same-sex marriage? No, I wouldn’t. But if they’re

willing to support me, I’ll be their president. I’ll be anybody’s

president, but I’ll be true to my convictions, and I think that’s what

Americans look for — not someone they’re going to agree with on

everything, but somebody who at least has some convictions, sticks

with them, can explain them, and can at least have respect for people

who have different ones.


COOPER: Another question about the local economy.

ADAM FLORZAK: This is Adam Florzak of Illinois. The national

debt is now growing so quickly it will have increased by over half-

million dollars in just the time it takes to ask this question. Over

the years, politicians have borrowed just under $2 trillion from the

Social Security trust fund to cover these massive budget deficits, and

now the retirements of our generation are at risk. What will you do

as president to help repay this money and restore the trust?

COOPER: Senator Thompson, a lot of retirees here in Florida.

Ninety seconds.

THOMPSON: One of the things I would do for his generation is

protect him from our generation.


He’s absolutely right, we’re spending his money, we’re spending

his children’s money, and we’re spending the money of kids yet to be


In 2017, Social Security will be in the red. Pretty soon it’ll

be out of money, it’ll go bankrupt. In fact, our entitlement programs

put together will take over the entire budget by about 2040.

So that’s why I get back to the point I made earlier. All these

programs that we talk about in the news every day are a thimbleful in

ocean compared to the entitlement tsunami that’s coming to hit us.

Now, we can do some things now, as I’ve proposed about Social

Security, without having to really hurt anybody, and give people to

invest for their future while they’re still working. Or we can wait

and let our grandkids or children, depending on how old they are,

solve this problem that we have left them. It’s not only a fiscal

issue; it’s a moral issue, as far as I’m concerned.

COOPER: Governor McCain?


I’m sorry — Governor Romney, 30 seconds.

ROMNEY: Thank you.

That’s one of the problems we face, and a big one, which is the

over-spending in Washington and the debt and the obligations we have.

We also face tough new competition coming from Asia. We face

global jihad, which we just talked about very briefly. We face a

whole series of extraordinary problems — over-use of oil, entitlement

is out of control.

It’s time for us to recognize we’re going to have to take a new

course in this country — not follow Hillary Clinton off to the left;

instead, to follow the pathway Ronald Reagan blazed, which is to say

we’re going to have a stronger America with a stronger economy and

have somebody who understands how jobs come and go, who understands

what propels our economy, will strengthen our economy, strengthen our

military and strengthen our families.

COOPER: I want to get as many of the YouTube questions in as


Let’s get another one here from another viewer.

STEVEN NIELSON: My name is Steve Nielson. And this question

comes to you from Denver, Colorado.

JFK’s vision put a man on the moon from a nonexistent space

program in about seven years. The new vision for space exploration

has provided about 15 years for that same feat.

Meanwhile, Congress is pulling funding for human-to-Mars research


Is there a candidate amongst you willing to take a pledge on

behalf of the Mars Society of sending an American to the surface of

Mars by 2020? If not, what is your vision for human space


COOPER: Governor Huckabee?

NASA pumps some — let’s see, how many — $5 billion into

Florida’s economy.

HUCKABEE: Whether we ought to go to Mars is not a decision that

I would want to make, but I would certainly want to make sure that we

expand the space program, because every one of us who are sitting here

tonight have our lives dramatically improved because there was a space

program — whether it’s these screens that we see or the incredible

electronics that we use, including the GPS systems that got many of

you to this arena tonight.


Some of you were late because you didn’t have one, by the way.

Or whether it’s the medical technologies that saved many of our lives

or the lives or our families, it’s the direct result of the space

program, and we need to put more money into science and technology and


Now, whether we need to send somebody to Mars, I don’t know. But

I’ll tell you what: If we do, I’ve got a few suggestions, and maybe

Hillary could be on the first rocket to Mars.


COOPER: Congressman Tancredo, 30 seconds, please.

TANCREDO: The question is a serious one and it deserves a

serious answer, and that is this: Look, we’ve been — how many times

up here, how many questions have dealt with the issue of deficit

spending, the debt out of control? And yet, we have somebody saying,

“But would you spend more money on going to Mars?”

And the suggestion that we need to spend more money on space

exploration. This is it, folks. That’s why we have such incredible

problems with our debt, because everybody’s trying to be everything to

all people.

We can’t afford some things, and by the way, going to Mars is one

of them.

COOPER: All right. Let’s move on. Another question here from

Los Angeles.

Actually, let’s show — all right.

DAVID MCMILLAN: Hi, my name is David McMillan, and I’m from Los

Angeles, California. On a variety of specific issues — gay marriage,

taxes, the death penalty, immigration, faith-based initiatives, school

vouchers, school prayer — many African Americans hold fairly

conservative views.

And yet, we overwhelmingly vote Democrat in most elections. So

my question to any of the Republican candidates here is, why don’t we

vote for you?


COOPER: Mayor Giuliani?

GIULIANI: We probably haven’t done a good enough job as a party

in pointing out that our solutions, our philosophy, is really the

philosophy that would be the most attractive to the overwhelming

majority of people in the African American and Hispanic community.

Whether they are upper middle class, rich, middle class or poor,

the — good education is something that everyone in all these

communities and all communities want. The idea of choice in education

is something that would totally turn around education in this country.

It’s something that large percentages of African American and Hispanic

parents support. They would like to be able to choose a private

school, a parochial school, a charter school, home-schooling for their


Instead, they have the government telling them that their child

has to go to an inadequate school.

So there are many, many issues on which we can reach out. I

found that one of the best was moving people off welfare. I moved

640,000 people off welfare, most of them to jobs. I change the

welfare agency into a job agency, and all of a sudden I had people

that had a future, people that had great hope in life.

I think the reason that crime not only declined in New York more

than anyplace else, but continues to decline, is that many of those

people who were hopeless 10, 12 years ago, now have hope. They have a

future. They have gotten the genius of the American way of life. We

haven’t made it available to all people, and we have to do that.

We will be a very popular party in those communities.

COOPER: Time. Governor Huckabee, 30 seconds.


HUCKABEE: Well, according to your network’s exit polls, some 48

percent of the African-Americans in my state did, in fact, vote for

me, which is unusually high for African-Americans voting for a

Republican. Here’s the reason why: because I asked for their vote,

and I didn’t wait until October of the election year to do it.

And, while I was governor, I tried to make sure that we included

people not only in appointments and employment, but also in the

programs that would truly make a difference, like putting

disproportionate amounts of help for health problems specifically

targeted to African-Americans like hypertension and AIDS and diabetes.

So there’s a reason. And I just want to express that our party had

better reach out not just to African-Americans, but to Hispanics and

to all people of this country.

I don’t want to be a part of a Republican party that is a tiny,

minute and ever decreasing party, but one that touches every American

from top to bottom, regardless of race.

COOPER: Our next question — let’s watch:


LEROY BROOKS: Hello, my name is Leroy Brooks. I am from

Houston, Texas and my question is for all the candidates.

Whether this flag right here represents the symbol of racism, a

symbol of political ideology, a symbol of Southern heritage — or, is

it something completely different?

COOPER: He’s talking about the stars and bars.

Governor Romney?

ROMNEY: Right now, with the kinds of issues we got in this

country, I’m not going to get involved with a flag like that. That’s

not a flag that I recognize so that I would hold up in my room.

The people of our country have decided not to fly that flag. I

think that’s the right thing.


My own view is that this country can go beyond that kind of

stuff, and that instead we can do as a party what we need to do, which

is to reach out to all Americans.

Every time I listen to someone like John Edwards get on TV and

say there are two Americans, I just want to — I just want to throw

something at the TV, because there are not two Americas. There’s one


We are a nation united. We face extraordinary challenges right

now. And Democrats dividing us and tearing down this country are

doing exactly the wrong thing.

We’re succeeding in Iraq. We’ve got tough challenges. We can

overcome them. But we do not need to have that kind of divisive talk.

And that flag, frankly, is divisive, and it shouldn’t be shown.

COOPER: Governor Thompson? Excuse me, Senator Thompson? Maybe

one day.

THOMPSON: I know that everybody who hangs the flag up in their

room like that is not racist. I also know that for a great many

Americans it’s a symbol of racism.

So, therefore, as a public place — he’s free to do whatever he

wants to in his home. As far as a public place is concerned, I am

glad that people have made the decision not to display it as a

prominent flag, symbolic of something, at a state capitol. As a part

of a group of flags or something of that nature, you know, honoring

various servicepeople at different times in different parts of the

country, I think that’s different.

But, as a nation, we don’t need to go out of our way to be

bringing up things that to certain people in our country that’s bad

for them.

COOPER: We’re running short on time. I want to get Ron Paul’s

video in. Let’s watch.


PAUL: The people are sick and tired of what they’re getting, and

they want some real changes.

I don’t want to run your life. We need less taxation, less

regulations, a better economic system.

We were not meant to be an empire; we were meant to be a

republic, protecting liberty here at home.

It’s up to you to spread this message around this country. This

is an American cause, it’s a cause of freedom. There’s something

going on in this country, and it stinks. It really stinks.


COOPER: That’s part of the Paul campaign.

Let’s get to another YouTube — YouTube question.

DR. HANK CAMPBELL: Good evening. My name is Dr. Hank Campbell.

I’m in Lake Worth, Florida. My question is our infrastructure. It’s

been estimated that to fix the bridges, the tunnels, the power grids,

the water delivery systems in this country will be in excess of $2

trillion — that is “t” for “trillion” — and it is plural.

Who among the candidates here is willing to step forward and

begin to articulate the very difficult sacrifices which we need to

make in order to start repairing America? Thank you.

COOPER: Mayor Giuliani?

GIULIANI: Well, I faced a situation like this, a microcosm of it

in New York City. New York City hadn’t invested in infrastructure for

a very, long time. I had kind of gotten through its fiscal crisis

that way. We started a long-term capital investment program on the

infrastructure. My predecessor started it. I continued it. I turned

it over to my successor and it really has done I think remarkable work

in rebuilding the infrastructure of New York. That’s what America


It can’t be done by one president. This is something where

you’re going to need a succession of presidents to have a sustained

program. Probably we should have budgeting that allows for — we

can’t really have a capital budget under federal budgeting, but we

could have a separate accounting.

So that kind of budgeting is long-term, because this is going to

help America over a 20- or a 30-year period. Most of the time when

we’re spending money, as Senator Thompson said, we’re spending the

next generation’s money and we shouldn’t be doing that. Fiscal

conservatism is about preventing that.

But when we’re rebuilding our roads, rebuilding our bridges,

building new bridges, rebuilding our infrastructure, that’s actually

going to benefit the next generation and the generation after. And

there are ways to spread that out over a long period of time.

But it needs a sustained program, and it cannot be done just by

the federal government. It needs to be done as a partnership with

state and local governments. And I believe I’d be in a good position

to lead that.

COOPER: Congressman Paul, 30 seconds.

PAUL: The infrastructure problem in this country is very, very

serious. We as Americans are taxed to blow up the bridges overseas.

We’re taxed to go over and rebuild the bridges overseas while our

bridges are falling down in this country.

This country is going bankrupt, and we can’t afford this. We

need to take care of ourselves. We do not need to sacrifice one thing

more. We just need to take care of ourselves and get the government

out of our lives and off our back and out of our wallets.


COOPER: Senator McCain, 30 seconds.

MCCAIN: First thing I’ll do, my friends, is take out my veto pen

and veto every single pork-barrel project that comes across my desk,

and there will be no more bridges to nowhere under my administration,

I promise you that. And we’ll give the president of the United States

the line-item veto which Rudy Giuliani opposed so that he could

protect his $250 million worth of pork.

My friends, we will take the money and give it back to the states

and we’ll let them make these decisions, but we’ll never have another

pork barrel project as long as I’m capable of wielding a veto pen.

COOPER: Time. We’ve got another question.

GIULIANI: Anderson, may I please respond…

COOPER: Go ahead, 30 seconds.

GIULIANI: … to the little side shot?

COOPER: Thirty seconds.

GIULIANI: The reality is that the line-item veto is


COOPER: Quiet.

GIULIANI: The line-item veto is unconstitutional.

MCCAIN: The line-item veto is constitutional.

GIULIANI: If you are a strict — the line-item veto is

unconstitutional determined not by John McCain, but by the Supreme

Court. And the Supreme Court found that the line-item veto is


If I hadn’t challenged that, I would not have been carrying out

my fiduciary duties for the people of New York City. That was money

that was illegally deprived to the people of my city. I fought for

them and beat Bill Clinton. Not bad to have a Republican who can beat

Bill Clinton.


COOPER: Let’s go to the next question — it’s for Ron Paul.

MARK STRAUSS: Mark Strauss, Davenport, Iowa.

This question is for Ron Paul.

Mr. Paul, I think we both know that the Republican party is never

going to give you the nomination. But I’m hoping that you’re crazy

like a fox like that and you’re using this exposure to propel yourself

into an independent run.

My question is for Ron Paul: Mr. Paul, are you going to let

America down by not running as an independent?

Thank you.

PAUL: Now that’s what I call a tough question, because I have no

intention of doing this.

I am a Republican. I have won 10 times as a Republican and we’re

doing quite well. We had 5,000 people show up at a rally in front of

the Independence Hall with blacks and Hispanics and a cross-section of

this country.

You know that we raised $4.3 million in one day?


Without spending one cent. We didn’t even pay an individual to

go out and they weren’t professional fund-raisers. It came in here —

it was automatic.

We’re struggling to figure out how to spend the money. This is

country is in a revolution. They’re sick and tired of what they’re

getting. And I happen to be lucky enough to be part of it.

COOPER: I’ll take that as a no.


We — unfortunately, this is our last question of the night.

CHRIS KRUL: Giuliani, can you explain why you being a lifelong

Yankees fan, that this year, after the Yankees lost everything, you

rooted for the Red Sox in the postseason? Can you explain that

position for me?


COOPER: Mayor Giuliani?

GIULIANI: Hey, Krul. Hey, Krul. I’m Giuliani. He’s Krul. So

I’ll explain it to him like in Brooklyn.

I’m an American — I’m an American League fan. I root for the

American League team when they get into the World Series. I’ve done

it for 50 years. I actually rooted for the Red Sox…


GIULIANI: Can’t help it. I’m an American League fan. I rooted

for the White Sox, the Tigers, the Red Sox.

As soon as the World Series are over, I rooted for the Yankees

again. We’re gonna beat you next year.


I unfortunately have lost a bet already, to John McCain, with the

Arizona Diamondbacks, so I don’t have a 100 record. But I do point

out that when I was mayor of New York City, the Yankees won four world



And — wait, wait, wait.

I wanted to put this — I wanted to put this in our reel, but

they cut it out, so I’m going to get it in — and since I’ve left

being mayor of New York City, the Yankees have won none.


COOPER: Governor Romney, very quickly, your chance.

ROMNEY: Eighty-seven long years. We waited 87 long years. And

true suffering Red Sox fans that my family and I are, we could not

have been more happy than to see the Red Sox win the World Series,

except by being able to beat the Yankees when they were ahead three

games to none.

And so, I have to tell you that like most Americans, we love our

sports teams and we hate the Yankees.

COOPER: I want to thank you all for participating tonight. I

want to thank all those viewers who submitted the questions, 5,000

questions. I want to thank everyone in the audience, the Republican

Party of Florida for hosting us.

Thank you very much.


The Latest
Shortly after 11 p.m., the university said police were on scene near 70 Arts Circle Drive investigating reports of an active threat. About 11:44, police issued an all clear, saying no one had been shot.
Police said the victims, including a 14-year-old boy, were inside a home in the 8000 block of South Vincennes Avenue in Chatham about 7:33 p.m. when two men entered and shot them.
Jashawn Forest, 20, was identified by the Cook County Medical Examiner’s Office, which ruled his death a homicide.
Rather than seeing his players give in to the growing adversity, coach Billy Donovan watched them turn the second half into a brawl — and eventually a win.