EDITORIAL: Climate change is upon us, and we must take dramatic action now

SHARE EDITORIAL: Climate change is upon us, and we must take dramatic action now
afp_19v0h1_79243796_e1539030767900.jpg

This file photograph taken on September 8, 2013, shows an access road being constructed in a peatland forest being cleared for a palm oil plantation on Indonesia’s Sumatra island. The destruction has led to the release of vast amounts of climate change-causing carbon dioxide. Indonesia is the third biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, after China and the US. (Photo by CHAIDEER MAHYUDDIN/AFP/Getty Images

The dangers of climate change are heating up like never before.

Any hope that further scientific study might come to the comforting conclusion that the effects of carbon emissions are not as bad as advertised — that they might come more slowly and less severely — have been dashed.

A new landmark study by top scientists has concluded that climate change disaster is approaching more quickly than we thought and that only an unprecedented global effort can prevent its worst effects. As a global community, we simply must change course.

EDITORIAL

The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the leading scientific organization examining the phenomenon and its impact, said in a report issued Monday that food shortages and wildfires will get worse, coral reefs will die off and sea levels will rise by feet rather than inches in our lifetimes if too little is done.

It’s the epic battle of our age. Every nation, every major corporation — all of us — must work to win it.

We are slowed to action by corporations and wealthy individuals who, along with their sycophants, profit from the status quo. We are burdened by a president who attacks climate-protection measures, including the Paris Climate Accord, as the planet lurches toward catastrophe. They are like firefighters who shrug off 911 calls.

Moreover, we can’t dodge this looming crisis just by adjusting our thermostats. We need to scale up programs that don’t yet exist and rely on technologies that aren’t yet invented. And we have a very short time to do so. To prevent a global temperature rise of 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit over pre-industrial levels, greenhouse gases must be cut by 45 percent from 2010 levels by 2030 and by 100 percent in 2050.

The report holds a glimmer of hope: If we can limit the rise in the heat, then heat waves, powerful storms and droughts will be far less common; smog, heat and infectious diseases will cause far fewer deaths; the sea level will rise four fewer inches; far fewer plants and animals will lose most of their habitats; half as many people will lack sufficient water, and irreversible melting might not begin on the West Antarctic ice sheet.

The question is whether we can summon the political will for such an enormous undertaking.

The time to do so is now.

Yale Professor William Nordhaus speaks during a press conference after winning the 2018 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences at Yale University on Monday in New Haven, Connecticut. Professor Nordhaus’ research has been focused on the economics of climate chan

Yale Professor William Nordhaus speaks during a press conference after winning the 2018 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences at Yale University on Monday in New Haven, Connecticut. Professor Nordhaus’ research has been focused on the economics of climate change, economic growth and natural resources. (Photo by Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/Getty Images)

Send letters to letters@suntimes.com.

The Latest
So the Sox have that going for them, which is, you know, something.
Two bison were born Friday at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia. The facility’s 30-acre pasture has long been home to the grazing mammals.
Have the years of quarterback frustration been worth this moment? We’re about to find out.
The massive pop culture convention runs through Sunday at McCormick Place.
With all the important priorities the state has to tackle, why should Springfield rush to help the billionaire McCaskey family build a football stadium? The answer: They shouldn’t. The arguments so far don’t convince us this project would truly benefit the public.