Congressional tax cut plan is a tax on disability

SHARE Congressional tax cut plan is a tax on disability
u_s__capitol.jpg

The Capitol dome on Capitol Hill in Washington. | Alex Brandon/AP

Very few politicians will flat out say they hate disabled people. So why would anyone target people with disabilities for increased taxes, especially when we are among those who can least afford it?

OPINION

There are no ifs, ands or buts. The tax plans in both the House and the Senate raise taxes on the people who can least afford it, in order to give tax breaks to a very wealthy few. The plans also cut Medicare by $500 billion and slash Medicaid by $1 trillion. These cuts will trigger devastation for the vast majority of people with disabilities, who are already struggling with years of Illinois state budget cuts.

The costs of a long-term disability can be quite surprising to non-disabled people. Customized power chairs can easily reach over $50,000 per chair. Digital hearing aids can cost between $1,500 and $3,500 — per ear. Thousands of people have medications that reach, well, thousands of dollars per month. And that’s not even counting the costs of therapy, respite services or personal care.

That’s what the congressional tax plans do: people with disabilities will be taxed, over and over again. First, we will suffer taxes in the loss of key deductions that afford equality and protect against bankruptcy. And then, when there is less money in federal coffers to support disability programs, we will be “taxed” again through budget cuts to vital programs we need.

The House wants to eliminate the medical expense deduction, which is particularly essential for the economic well-being of families. One catastrophic incident or the annual cost of medication for an AIDS or cancer patient, for example, can be enough to force families on the financial edge into bankruptcy. The medical expense deduction helps prevent poverty, thus to eliminate it … that’s a tax on disability.

Both the House and Senate plans eliminate the disabled access tax credit and the work opportunity tax credit. The former provides a deduction to small businesses for modifications to make their business more accessible. The latter provides an incentive to employers for hiring people with disabilities. Access to work in and shop at places of business in our local communities is essential to leveling the social playing field. Not only will elimination of these credits also eliminate opportunity for disabled people: they’re “taxes” on disability.

Reducing taxes will create a general reduction in federal coffers, which means less money to fund programs across the states. As we saw this year, Medicaid became the number one target of federal budget cuts through block grant proposals. Again, the tax plan’s most devastating impact is cutting that $1 trillion out of Medicaid and allowing the $500 billion cut to Medicare, in order to give big tax breaks to wealthy people … that is not a tax but a death sentence.

Real tax reform should benefit everyone, improving society and stimulating our economy. But the tax plans in Congress now are neither bipartisan nor balanced: they are squarely attacks on people with disabilities and our families.

Marca Bristo is president & CEO of Access Living

Send letters to letters@suntimes.com.

The Latest
District leaders will join teachers for a lobbying day in the state capital. Critics say the day away from classrooms is inappropriate.
Experts say the deaths of the family — consisting of two adults and one offspring — may be related to rodenticide poisoning.
Jackson, one of Williams’ good friends, caught 35 passes for 267 yards last season after transferring to Nevada. He is in camp on a tryout basis.
Karol Chwiesiuk spent roughly 10 minutes inside the Capitol as a mob attempted to prevent Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s presidential electoral victory.
Public Safety Committee Chairman Brian Hopkins (2nd) plans to hold City Council hearings to find out how many CTA buses will be shuttling delegates to and from the United Center, whether dedicated bus lanes will be used and whether the transit agency will be able to recruit enough employees without “adjusting service.”