EDITORIAL: Slow down and take a breath, Illinois, before spending clean air money

SHARE EDITORIAL: Slow down and take a breath, Illinois, before spending clean air money
20180323_brett_traffic__dsc0604_e1525109390387.jpg

Environmental advocates and some lawmakers say the Illinois EPA is rushing to spend the state’s share of money from the Volkswagen emissions settlement without enough public input because they want to help Gov. Bruce Rauner’s chances at re-election. Some also are concerned that the state’s plans don’t focus enough on curbing air pollution from cars and trucks. | Better Government Association photo

Politics is what politicians — left, right or center — do.

So it’s no surprise that Gov. Bruce Rauner’s administration is itching to spend Illinois’ $109 million windfall from Volkswagen’s settlement in its diesel emissions cheating scandal.

EDITORIAL

Spending money to curb air pollution would certainly give Rauner some pro-environment bona fides before his November showdown with Democratic challenger J.B. Pritzker. There’s not a politician out there who wouldn’t take the same advantage in a heated election.

But some lawmakers and environmental groups want to slow down the spending and are criticizing the Illinois EPA’s draft plan as too friendly to large diesel engine manufacturers, as the Better Government Association reported this week.

That might seem like political gamesmanship, too, since the lawmakers are Democrats and environmental groups aren’t happy with Rauner.

But in this case, we think their reasons are valid.

The $2.9 billion Volkswagen settlement — and Illinois, by the way, is getting more of that money than any other state in the Midwest — is supposed to pay for clean air projects that states design. Minnesota, Colorado, Ohio and other states held public hearings on their projects. You’d think Illinois would do the same, and make it a point to hear from experts and everyday citizens who might want, say, more charging stations for electric cars or more electric school buses.

Instead, the state’s EPA has only accepted written comments submitted online, ignoring criticism in February that it reneged on a plan to hold public hearings. The idea that “people might not show up,” as the head of the state’s EPA told lawmakers last week, is a pretty lame excuse. People can’t show up if there’s no place for them to go.

The Illinois Senate passed a bill last week to require six hearings and a task force to make decisions on spending the $109 million. That might be overkill, but then again, what’s the rush?

Unless you’re running for reelection.

Send letters to letters@suntimes.com.

The Latest
The Logan Square restaurant’s take on the pan-fried noodle dish, a popular street food in Malaysia, stays true to its roots.
As his libido disappears, he advises his wife to take on a friend with benefits, and she’s considering it.
The truth is, it would be safer for motorists, pedestrians and cyclists if drivers drove even slower — 20, 15, even 5 mph. So where to draw the line? Why not start with tougher enforcement of the existing speed limit?
A new report from the Alliance for Entrepreneurial Equity finds that Black business owners still face barriers that keep them from thriving, such as lack of access to capital.