Letters: Electoral College should not vote for Trump

SHARE Letters: Electoral College should not vote for Trump
trump_electors_washington_65663971.jpg

Washington state presidential elector Levi Guerra, center, joined by fellow elector P. Bret Chiafalo, right, announce that they’re asking members of the Electoral College to pick a Republican “consensus candidate” rather than Donald Trump during a news conference in front of the Legislative Building, Wednesday, Nov. 30, 2016, in Olympia, Wash. (Steve Bloom/The Olympian via AP)

Now that there is a high level of confidence that Russian leader Vladimir Putin was directly involved with his country’s attempts to influence our presidential election in favor of his preferred candidate, it is up to the Electoral College to do their job. They cannot elect Donald Trump to be the president of our country.

They are also under no requirement to elect Hillary Clinton. Although that would be a reasonably solution based on the outcome of the popular vote, it isn’t a requirement from a constitutional standpoint. What is a requirement from a moral standpoint is to act to protect our nation from the most egregious act of electoral external interference in our history.

Don Anderson, Oak Park

Running scared

It’s ironic how the party most guilty of dirty tricks and underhanded tactics has the nerve to accuse others of the very thing they are guilty of doing. Leave it to the Republicans to start wasting money and boring the public to death with their repeated robocalls. Give it a rest. The GOP uses these tactics as a distraction from the governor’s poor performance. It goes to show the GOP is running scared of two possible candidates for governor, J.B. Pritzker and Chris Kennedy.

Ann Gutierrez, Tinley Park

Don’t repeal Obamacare without replacement

While Congress prepares to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act, it’s important to remember what’s really at stake – the health and well-being of people – including over 1 million Illinoisans who depend on coverage under the ACA. We can’t afford to take action that disrupts healthcare coverage and the Illinois economy.

Any repeal of ACA coverage should not take effect until the replacement plan takes effect. If Congress does not make repeal of coverage contingent on adoption of a replacement plan, then Congress should also repeal the hospital payment cuts that help pay for ACA coverage. Illinois hospitals have experienced over $1 billion in ACA payment cuts.

Otherwise, people won’t be able to get the care they need, local economies will suffer and jobs will be lost. Facing revenue losses, hospitals will be forced to cut spending by reducing services and staff, delaying new technology and facilities or shifting costs to privately insured patients.

If Congress repeals coverage and does not replace it, the preliminary estimate is that the loss of this revenue in Illinois will result in a potential loss of $11.6 billion to $13.1 billion in annual economic activity which translates to a potential loss of 84,000 to 95,000 jobs.

On behalf of our 200 hospitals and 50 health systems, and the patients and communities they serve, IHA looks forward to working in a bipartisan manner with our state and federal officials to improve our health system. Remember the first lesson of medicine – First, do no harm.

A.J. Wilhelmi

President and CEO

Illinois Health and Hospital Association

Naperville

The Latest
The man tried to choke the woman he was arguing with, and she stabbed him in the neck, police said.
The faux flower installations have popped up at restaurants and other businesses in Lake View, Lincoln Park, the West Loop and beyond, mirroring a global trend.
Mayor Brandon Johnson’s latest initiatives don’t address concerns raised in a lawsuit against the city and provide no reassurance the city will get accessible housing right going forward.
Expanding insurance coverage of high-priced injectable weight-loss drugs for state workers will cost taxpayers $210 million in the first year of the initiative. But at least one economist says that estimate is way off and is expected to be millions more.
Prosecuting Assange would pose a grave threat to freedom of the press by treating common journalistic practices as crimes.