Sweet column: Clinton to Obama--Return Rezko campaign cash

SHARE Sweet column: Clinton to Obama--Return Rezko campaign cash

COLUMBIA, S.C. — For the second day in a row, White House hopeful Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has prodded chief rival Sen. Barack Obama about his relationship with a former career political patron and friend, Tony Rezko, who is facing a Feb. 25 federal criminal trial in Chicago on public corruption and fraud charges involving state of Illinois teacher pension funds.

On Tuesday, the Clinton campaign, in a memo, said Obama “has thus far failed to return all contributions associated with Mr. Rezko, which included money that was given through straw donors or obtained from Illinois taxpayers.”

Clinton was referring to political donations Rezko solicited, or bundled, for Obama’s U.S. Senate — not presidential — campaign fund.

During Monday’s Democratic debate in Myrtle Beach — in advance of Saturday’s South Carolina primary — Clinton asked Obama about legal work he did for “your contributor, Rezko, in his slum landlord business in inner city Chicago.”

That was a reference to a Sun-Times investigation that revealed Obama clocked five hours of legal chores for Rezko, but more centrally, took political donations from Rezko even as Rezko’s low-income housing empire was collapsing.

For months, the Clinton campaign figured that the national press would be more interested in Obama’s dealings with Rezko, an insider wheeler-dealer under indictment who, with his wife, played a role in Obama and his wife, Michelle, being able to buy their large South Side home.

Clinton gave back $850,000

In part, the Clinton team figured Rezko would become more of a campaign storyline because the Clintons rarely caught a break when it came to reporting about anything even remotely controversial about their lives.

Clinton returned nearly $850,000 when it was revealed that one of her presidential bundlers, Norman Hsu, was on the lam from criminal charges and may have laundered campaign donations through straw donors.

Obama spokesman Bill Burton said Clinton’s call for Obama to scrub his list for Rezko money “takes a lot of moxie” coming from someone who had to give back $850,000 in Hsu’s bundled donations. Asked if more Rezko money would be rejected, Burton said, “we are constantly reviewing our contributions.”

Last weekend, the Sun-Times broke a story that Obama was the unnamed “political candidate” who received a $10,000 contribution for his 2004 U.S. Senate run from a person who allegedly got the money through a Rezko-connected scheme. Also, Rezko may have improperly used straw donors to funnel Senate campaign cash to Obama.

After the story ran, the Obama campaign Saturday announced a $40,000 charitable donation in Rezko-related money. Earlier, the Senate fund donated $44,000 in Rezko-connected cash. The Sun-Times estimates Rezko raised at least $168,000. However, the extent of Rezko’s help in raising Senate money for Obama isn’t known.

There are indications that Clinton and her allies will continue to press Obama on Rezko, especially as the Feb. 5 votes are looming in 22 states and Rezko’s trial is near. Meanwhile, Rezko hovers as an issue for Obama if he gets the nomination.

For weeks now, the Republican National Committee has been circulating Rezko clips.

The Latest
The man suffered head trauma and was pronounced dead at University of Chicago Medical Center, police said.
Another federal judge in Chicago who also has dismissed gun cases based on the same Supreme Court ruling says the high court’s decision in what’s known as the Bruen case will “inevitably lead to more gun violence, more dead citizens and more devastated communities.”
Women make up just 10% of those in careers such as green infrastructure and clean and renewable energy, a leader from Openlands writes. Apprenticeships and other training opportunities are some of the ways to get more women into this growing job sector.
Chatterbox doesn’t seem aware that it’s courteous to ask questions, seek others’ opinions.
The way inflation is measured masks certain costs that add to the prices that consumers pay every day. Not surprisingly, higher costs mean lower consumer confidence, no matter what Americans are told about an improving economy.