BROWN: Rauner not likely to shake off desire to shake up Springfield

SHARE BROWN: Rauner not likely to shake off desire to shake up Springfield
illinois_politics_70647005_1.jpg

Gov. Bruce Rauner greets supporters before he takes the stage at a Republican Day rally at the Illinois State Fair in Springfield, Ill. Wednesday, Aug. 16, 2017. File Photo. (Rich Saal/The State Journal-Register via AP)

Ever since Gov. Bruce Rauner’s big staff shakeup back in July, there’s been speculation he isn’t going to run for re-election in 2018.

That talk resumed last week when Rauner outraged the conservative wing of the Republican Party by signing legislation to protect and expand abortion rights after promising he wouldn’t.

The thinking is the governor wouldn’t have dared antagonize the GOP base, nor shoved aside his political team, if he planned on running again.

As eager as I am for the day when Rauner and his money exit the Illinois political scene, those who believe it’s going to be that easy to get rid of him are kidding themselves.

I don’t claim to have any super secret inside sources who know for a fact that Rauner has decided to seek a second term.

OPINION

All I can judge by is my own experience and observation, as well as talking with others who have either more experience or a better vantage point.

And I just don’t see the man quitting, certainly not at this point when his time in public office would likely be portrayed as a failure. Nor have I found anyone to disagree with that assessment.

I’d argue it’s not in Rauner’s nature to step aside, although when you really think about it, there’s hardly ever a politician who, by nature, is satisfied with one term and done.

Their egos won’t allow it, which is not a comment on Rauner’s considerable sense of self, rather a comment on those who seek public office as a group. It takes a lot of ego to put oneself in that line of fire.

The campaign ahead will be rough, but in his four years on the political scene, the Republican governor has proven himself to be somebody who doesn’t back away from a good political fight.

Rather, he seems to relish the fighting, even the retail campaigning, originally deemed his weak point as a candidate.

And as vulnerable as Rauner has made himself during three years of meltdown in state government, he’s not yet beaten.

The re-election campaign Rauner would run is no secret.

As he has for the past four years, Rauner is going to campaign against what he will portray as the corrupt Illinois political establishment — personified by Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan — that has blocked him from accomplishing his goals.

He’s going to ask voters for the sake of the future of Illinois to allow him to finish the job that he’s started.

And Rauner will spend his millions to savage his to-be-determined Democratic opponent in campaign ads until voters are nearly as sick of that candidate as they are of him.

After that, it will be a matter of whether enough Illinois Democrats understand their best chance to strike a blow against President Donald Trump is to come out and vote in the mid-term elections.

Rauner is circulating nominating petitions, but has made no formal announcement about re-election.

There are those who argue the businessman in Rauner will look at his re-election chances and the tens of millions of his personal wealth that he’s expended to date and decide it’s a bad investment to double that.

But the wealthy businessman has said from the start that he made an eight-year commitment to politics because he believed it would take that long to turn Illinois around. And I don’t believe for a moment that we’ve seen the outside limit of what he’s willing to spend to achieve his goal.

Rauner may not have managed to turn around Illinois as he’d planned, but at this point, there’s no evidence that Illinois has turned around Rauner either.

The Latest
The massive pop culture convention runs through Sunday at McCormick Place.
With all the important priorities the state has to tackle, why should Springfield rush to help the billionaire McCaskey family build a football stadium? The answer: They shouldn’t. The arguments so far don’t convince us this project would truly benefit the public.
Art
“Chryssa & New York” is the first museum show in North America in more than four decades to spotlight the artist. It also highlights her strong ties to Chicago’s art world.
If these plans for new stadiums from the Bears, White Sox and Red Stars are going to have even a remote chance of passage, teams will have to drastically scale back their state asks and show some tangible benefits for state taxpayers.
The Bears put the figure at $4.7 billion. But a state official says the tally to taxpayers goes even higher when you include the cost of refinancing existing debt.