Backing ban on red-light camera campaign cash, then taking the money is just hypocrisy

Sure, the amounts some state lawmakers accepted were relatively small sums and dispersed before the reform bill was signed into law. But no means no.

SHARE Backing ban on red-light camera campaign cash, then taking the money is just hypocrisy
A sign in Chicago warns of a red-light camera. Illinois lawmakers passed a law in May that banned campaign contributions from red-light camera companies. But some lawmakers have since taken money from those companies.

Illinois lawmakers passed a law in May that banned campaign contributions from red-light camera companies. But some lawmakers have since taken money from those companies.

AP

Illinoisans may be seeing red again reading about some state lawmakers’ latest exercise in hypocrisy.

After backing legislation that bans campaign contributions from the troubled red-light camera industry and its executives, these elected officials didn’t waste too much time in taking money from such entities, the Sun-Times’ Robert Herguth reported over the weekend.

Most of the amounts accepted were relatively small sums and dispersed before Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed the reform bill into law in late July. But that doesn’t alleviate the concerns. Green-lighting these campaign contributions after signing off on a measure that clearly spells out they are forbidden is a red flag.

Illinois Senate President Don Harmon took two contributions totaling $5,000 from the Lombard-based red-light camera contractor Redspeed Illinois just six weeks after he and others in the General Assembly approved the bill in May, according to Herguth’s investigation.

Editorial

Editorial

Smaller Redspeed contributions were also accepted in June by state Rep. Bradley Stephens, R-Rosemont; state Rep. Anthony DeLuca, D-Chicago Heights; and state Sen. Karina Villa, D-West Chicago.

Redspeed, meanwhile. gave state Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Belleville, $1,000 last month when the campaign contribution was officially prohibited by law, which also bars state, county and local officials from working or receiving compensation from red-light camera companies for two years after leaving office.

Harmon maintained in a statement that he “holds the highest ethical standards and will continue to do so.” DeLuca said he did nothing wrong because he took the money before the law took effect. And Hoffman modified a campaign report so it no longer showed the Redspeed contribution.

Such excuses are unacceptable. They’re a clear indication the law may need to be amended to include penalties for violators.

That state leaders accepted Redspeed money also raises the question of whether campaign contributions by lobbyists for the red-light camera industry should be banned as well. That’s a pretty easy “yes” for us. Why leave open a loophole here?

From the Redflex Traffic Systems Inc. bribery scheme in Chicago, the ongoing bribery and kickback scandal involving SafeSpeed LLC and convictions and charges of local and state officials, the red-light camera industry has been mired deep in controversy.

Politicians should know how to keep their distance when even the appearance of impropriety is on the line. They can’t impose rules on paper, only to do the exact opposite because they don’t expect to be caught red-handed.

The Sun-Times welcomes letters to the editor and op-eds. See our guidelines.

The Latest
Another observation on the great year for coho fishing, a bush-trimming velvet buck in the suburbs and sandhill cranes on a famous Wisconsin golf course are among the notes from around Chicago outdoors and beyond.
The court overturned another decades-old precedent, the Chevron doctrine. Opponents of all kinds of regulations meant to protect ordinary Americans will now be able to tie up proposed rules in court for years.
How a reporter’s interview turned into a friendship with Esteban Pantoja, actor and creator of one of the most beloved drag characters in the Mexican American community in the South Side of Chicago.
Michael Pfleger, South Side pastor, whose peace marches are legendary, shifts to a media campaign to reach parents.
The schools target Black, Brown, low-income students with their recruiting, offering promises of future economic stability that’s rarely fulfilled. Instead, students are left saddled with debt, in low-paying jobs that pay them what high school grads make, a WBEZ investigation has found.