Paxlovid free so far, but sticker shock awaits next year if you need the COVID treatment

Within months, the government plans to stop footing the bill — and millions of the uninsured and seniors might have to pay full price. Experts say that means fewer people will get the potentially life-saving treatments.

SHARE Paxlovid free so far, but sticker shock awaits next year if you need the COVID treatment
Pfizer’s Paxlovid pills are displayed.

The federal government soon will stop paying for Paxlovid, Pfizer’s antiviral drug for COVID-19 that has proven to be the most effective at keeping patients alive and out of the hospital.

Joe Raedle / Getty Images

Nearly six million Americans have taken Paxlovid for free, courtesy of the federal government. 

The Pfizer pill has helped prevent many infected with COVID-19 from being hospitalized or dying, and it might even reduce the risk of developing long COVID.

But now, within months, the government plans to stop footing the bill — and millions of people at the highest risk of severe illness and least able to afford the drug — the uninsured and seniors — might have to pay the full price. 

Experts say that means fewer people will get the potentially life-saving treatments.

“I think the numbers will go way down,” said Jill Rosenthal, director of public health policy for the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning think tank. 

A bill for several hundred dollars or more for the drug would lead many to decide the medication isn’t worth the price, she said.

In response to the unprecedented public health crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic, the federal government spent billions of dollars on developing new vaccines and treatments, with swift success: Less than a year after the pandemic was declared, medical workers got their first vaccines. 

But, as many people have refused the shots and stopped wearing masks, the virus still rages and mutates. In 2022, 250,000 Americans have died from COVID — more than have died from strokes or diabetes.

But soon the federal Department of Health and Human Services will stop supplying COVID treatments, and pharmacies will be billing patients for them the same way they do for, say, antibiotics or asthma inhalers. 

Paxlovid is expected to hit the private market in mid-2023, according to HHS plans shared in an October meeting with state health officials and clinicians. Merck’s Lagevrio, a less-effective treatment pill, and AstraZeneca’s Evusheld, a preventive therapy for the immunocompromised, are on track to be commercialized sooner, sometime in the winter.

The U.S. government has so far purchased 20 million courses of Paxlovid, priced at about $530 each, a discount for buying in bulk that Pfizer’s chief executive officer, Albert Bourla, called “really very attractive” to the federal government in a July earnings call.

The drug will cost far more on the private market, though Pfizer declined to disclose the planned price. 

The government also will stop paying for the company’s COVID vaccine next year — those shots will quadruple in price, from the discount rate the government pays of $30 to about $120.

Bourla told investors in November that he expects the move will make Paxlovid and its COVID vaccine “a multibillion-dollars franchise.”

Nearly nine  in 10 people dying from the virus now are 65 or older. Yet federal law restricts Medicare Part D — the prescription drug program that covers nearly 50 million seniors — from covering the COVID treatment pills. The medications are meant for those most at risk of serious illness, including seniors.

Paxlovid and the other treatments are available under an emergency-use authorization from the federal Food and Drug Administration, a fast-track review used in extraordinary situations. 

Though Pfizer applied for full approval in June, that process can take from several months to years. And Medicare Part D can’t cover any medications without that full stamp of approval.

Paying out-of-pocket would be “a substantial barrier” for seniors on Medicare — the people who would benefit most from the drug, federal health experts wrote.

“From a public health perspective and even from a health care capacity and cost perspective, it would just defy reason to not continue to make these drugs readily available,” said Dr. Larry Madoff, medical director of Massachusetts’ Bureau of Infectious Disease and Laboratory Sciences. 

Madoff said he’s hopeful the federal health agency will find a way to set aside unused doses for seniors and people without insurance.

In mid-November, the White House asked Congress to approve an additional $2.5 billion for COVID therapeutics and vaccines to help ensure that people can afford the medications when they’re no longer free. But there’s little hope it will be approved; the Senate voted that day to end the public health emergency and denied similar requests in recent months.

Many Americans already have faced hurdles just getting a prescription for covid treatment. Tthough the federal government doesn’t track who’s gotten the drug, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study using data from 30 medical centers found that Black and Hispanic patients with COVID were much less likely to get Paxlovid than white patients. And, when the government no longer is picking up the tab, experts predict these gaps by race, income,and geography will widen.

Graphic showing Black seniors receive Paxlovid less often than other older adults.

Hannah Recht / KHN

People in Northeastern states used the drug far more often than those in the rest of the country, according to a KHN analysis of Paxlovid use in September and October. But it wasn’t because people in that region were getting sick from COVID at much higher rates. Many of those states offered better access to health care and also created special programs to get Paxlovid to their residents.

About 10 mostly Democratic states and several large counties in the Northeast and elsewhere created free “test-to-treat” programs that allow their residents to get an immediate doctor visit and prescription for treatment after testing positive. In Massachusetts, more than 20,000 people have used the state’s video and phone hotline, available seven days a week in 13 languages. Massachusetts, which has the highest insurance rate in the country and relatively low travel times to pharmacies, had the second-highest Paxlovid usage rate among states this fall.

States with higher COVID death rates, like Florida and Kentucky, where people have to travel farther for health care and are more likely to be uninsured, used the drug less often. Without no-cost test-to-treat options, residents of those states have struggled to get prescriptions even though the drug itself is still free.

“If you look at access to medications for people who are uninsured, I think that there’s no question that will widen those disparities,” Rosenthal said.

Graphic showing the Northeast leads in Paxlovid use.

People who get insurance through their jobs could face high copayments, too, just as they do for insulin and other expensive or brand-name drugs.

Most insurance companies will end up covering COVID therapeutics to some extent, said Sabrina Corlette, a research professor at Georgetown University’s Center on Health Insurance Reforms. After all, the pills are cheaper than a hospital stay. But, for most people who get insurance through their jobs, there are “really no rules at all,” she said. Some insurers could take months to add the drugs to their plans or decide not to pay for them.

The additional cost means many will go without the medication. 

“We know from lots of research that, when people face cost-sharing for these drugs, that they need to take, they will often forgo or cut back,” Corlette said.

Medicaid, the public insurance program for low-income adults and children, will cover the treatments in full until at least early 2024.

HHS officials could set aside any leftover taxpayer-funded medication for people who can’t afford to pay the full cost, but they haven’t made public any concrete plans to do so. The government purchased 20 million courses of Paxlovid and three million of Lagevrio. Fewer than one-third have been used, and usage has fallen in recent months, according to KHN’s analysis.

Sixty percent of the government’s supply of Evusheld is also still available, though the COVID-prevention therapy is less effective against new strains of the virus. The health department in one state, New Mexico, has recommended against using it.

HHS didn’t make officials available for an interview or answer written questions about the commercialization plans.

Graphic showing most purchased COVID therapeutics sit unused.

The government created a potential workaround when it moved bebtelovimab, another COVID treatment, to the private market this summer. It now retails for $2,100 per patient. 

The agency set aside the remaining 60,000 government-purchased doses that hospitals could use to treat uninsured patients in a convoluted dose-replacement process. But it’s hard to tell how well that setup would work for Paxlovid: Bebtelovimab already was much less popular, and the FDA halted its use on Nov. 30 because it’s less effective against current strains of the virus.

Federal officials and insurance companies would have good reason to make sure patients can continue to afford COVID drugs: They’re far cheaper than if patients land in the emergency room.

“The medications are so worthwhile,” Madoff said. “They’re not expensive in the grand scheme of health care costs.”

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism on health issues. 

The Latest
In all, 129,000 children, 68% of those 5 or younger, had lead in their home drinking water, a study found.
It’s one to flush for the right-hander acquired from the Padres in the Dylan Cease trade.
Un cuestionario para candidatos para ayudarle a considerar sus opciones en las elecciones primarias de Illinois del 19 de marzo de 2024.
“I don’t talk about all the hard work and dedication it takes to take care of my son and the effort and the hard work that his siblings put in. … This is gonna be the rest of our lives,” Erika Boyd told reporters shortly after the City Council’s Finance Committee authorized a $45 million settlement to cover the medical care her son will need for the rest of his life.