Editorial: White Sox err with LaRoche

SHARE Editorial: White Sox err with LaRoche
white_sox_laroche_son_baseball_60068795.jpg

Adam LaRoche and son Drake head to the clubhouse during spring training last year. LaRoche abruptly retired after White Sox vice president Ken Williams asked him to scale back his son’s time with the team. File photo by John Locher, AP.

Follow @csteditorials

Ken Williams committed a costly error. That’s why some White Sox players smelled something foul in the air at spring training when designated hitter Adam LaRoche abruptly retired.

If the White Sox executive vice president wanted LaRoche to scale back bringing his son, Drake, to the ballpark, a policy outlining how often kids could accompany their dads should have been established in time for Opening Day. LaRoche said in a statement Friday that initially he was told to scale back his son’s time with the team and later told not to bring him at all. Williams has said he wanted it dialed back.

LaRoche’s son, who is home-schooled, has accompanied him to the ballpark over five seasons with the Washington Nationals and White Sox. LaRoche said he made an agreement with the White Sox about having his son with the team before signing for 2015.

EDITORIAL Follow @csteditorials

The timing of Williams’ request made it look to some like it was tied to LaRoche’s struggles on the field. His batting average slumped at .207 last season. He fought back spasms this season. If LaRoche had All-Star-caliber statistics, would Williams have curtailed his son’s visits? That’s the question some observers are asking.

Williams’ handling of Drake LaRoche’s visits has caused hard feelings among other White Sox players. Pitcher Chris Sale said Williams lied when he explained to the team the circumstances of his request. “There was absolutely no problem in here,” Sale said, adding that Williams “kind of created a problem.”

It’s rare to see kids hanging out in any workplace on a continual basis. Many baseball teams have become more welcoming of children over the years. A 162-game season, half of it spent on the road, leaves little time for players to see their kids. Who can fault a father who wants to share the national pastime with his child?

Still, there’s nothing wrong with putting limits on it. The White Sox erred by not establishing a clear-cut policy that applied to all.

Follow the Editorial Board on Twitter: @csteditorials

Tweets by @CSTeditorials

The Latest
The massive pop culture convention runs through Sunday at McCormick Place.
With all the important priorities the state has to tackle, why should Springfield rush to help the billionaire McCaskey family build a football stadium? The answer: They shouldn’t. The arguments so far don’t convince us this project would truly benefit the public.
Art
“Chryssa & New York” is the first museum show in North America in more than four decades to spotlight the artist. It also highlights her strong ties to Chicago’s art world.
If these plans for new stadiums from the Bears, White Sox and Red Stars are going to have even a remote chance of passage, teams will have to drastically scale back their state asks and show some tangible benefits for state taxpayers.
The Bears put the figure at $4.7 billion. But a state official says the tally to taxpayers goes even higher when you include the cost of refinancing existing debt.