Lawyers for inmate in ‘Making a Murderer’ ask Supreme Court to review confession

SHARE Lawyers for inmate in ‘Making a Murderer’ ask Supreme Court to review confession
makingamurdererdassey.jpg

Brendan Dassey appears in court at the Manitowoc County Courthouse in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, on April 16, 2007. Dassey is a Wisconsin inmate who was featured in the “Making a Murderer” series. Lawyers for Dassey who was featured in the series on Netflix asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, Feb. 20, 2018, to review a federal appeals court decision that held his confession was voluntary. | Dan Powers/The Post-Crescent, Pool, File

MILWAUKEE — Lawyers for a Wisconsin inmate featured in the “Making a Murderer” series on Netflix asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday to review a federal appeals court decision that held his confession was voluntary.

Brendan Dassey’s legal team told the high court in their petition that the case raises crucial issues that extend far beyond Dassey’s case alone and that long have divided state and federal courts.

Dassey’s lawyers claim investigators took advantage of his youth and intellectual and social disabilities to coerce him into falsely confessing that he helped his uncle, Steven Avery, rape and kill photographer Teresa Halbach in 2005 in the Avery family’s junkyard in Manitowoc County. Dassey was 16 at the time. He was sentenced to life in prison in 2007.

“Too many courts around the country, for many years, have been misapplying or even ignoring the Supreme Court’s instructions that confessions from mentally impaired kids like Brendan Dassey must be examined with the greatest care — and that interrogation tactics which may not be coercive when applied to an adult can overwhelm children and the mentally impaired,” his attorney, Steven Drizin, said in a statement.

A federal court in Wisconsin overturned Dassey’s conviction in 2016, and a three-judge panel of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that decision last June. While the full 7th Circuit voted 4-3 to reverse the panel’s decision to grant him a new trial, one dissenting judge called the case “a profound miscarriage of justice.”

The legal odds remain high against Dassey. The U.S. Supreme Court grants only a tiny fraction of the petitions for review that it receives.

Avery, who insists police framed him, is appealing his conviction in Wisconsin state courts.

The Latest
Why do lawmakers want to risk increasing the cost of prescription medications, a small business owner asks.
As a state that has already lost 90% of its wetlands, Illinois must protect what remains of these critical environments that may hold the key to bioremediation.
He calls his dad a cheapskate but won’t contribute toward a bigger gratuity.
Current driver’s license requirements for seniors are not making roads safer. Older drivers get in fewer accidents than other age groups, studies show.