Getting ahead early sends win expectancy soaring

SHARE Getting ahead early sends win expectancy soaring
screen_shot_2017_05_01_at_7_25_54_pm.png

A team that leads at any point in a major-league game wins more than half the time, even if that lead is only a single run in the first inning.

In the first month of the season, the White Sox (13-10 through Sunday) were about average in getting a first-inning jump. They scored in the first eight times and allowed first-inning runs eight times.

On the other hand, the Cubs (13-11 through Sunday) were in an early hole much more often than they’d like. They scored in the first seven times and allowed first-inning runs 12 times. No other team had given up runs in the first in half its games, and only five others had done so in 40 percent of their games or more.

And the Cubs aren’t just falling behind 1-0. They’ve allowed 28 runs in the first, an average of 2.33 for each opening inning in which the opponent has scored or a major-league-worst 1.17 runs per first overall. The White Sox are more than a half-run better at 0.65 runs per first.

For a look at how much difference it makes to fall behind early, there’s a win-expectancy finder at https://gregstoll.dyndns.org/~gregstoll/baseball/stats.html#H.-2.1.0.1. It draws on a database of all games played from 1957 through 2015 and tells us how often teams have won in any given situation.

At the start of a game, the home team has a win expectancy of 53.91 percent. When the visitors have scored one run in the first, they’ve gone on to win 51.76 percent of the time. If it’s the home team that takes a one-run lead into the top of the second, its chance of winning rises to 64.4 percent.

Visitors have won 62.04 percent of the time when leading by two runs after a half-inning and 70.38 percent of the time when leading by three. Home teams have won 74.13 percent of the time when leading by two after a full inning and 81.76 percent of the time when leading by three.

That multi-run effect is one reason sacrifice bunts early in games have declined. Successful sacrifices increase chances of scoring one run but decrease chances of scoring multiple runs, and those multi-run early innings send win expectancy soaring.

The Cubs went 5-5 in April when allowing more than one run in the first. Starters Jake Arrieta (14.40), John Lackey (12.60), Kyle Hendricks (10.80) and Brett Anderson (9.00) all had first-inning ERAs of 9.00 or higher, and Jon Lester was at 3.60.

The Sox played fewer such games, going 1-3 when allowing multi-run firsts.

The Cubs were much more successful in limiting early damage last season, ranking third in the majors with runs allowed in 23.46 percent of first innings and tied for fourth with 0.41 runs per first. The Sox were 16th at 32.1 percent of firsts but eighth at 0.51 runs per first.

For the Cubs, bringing those first-inning runs back down is looking like a key to having their win expectancy climb back up.

Follow me on Twitter @GrochowskiJ.

RELATED STORIES

Cubs, Maddon insist all is well

Hot-hitting Jay earns more play for Cubs

The Latest
The massive pop culture convention runs through Sunday at McCormick Place.
With all the important priorities the state has to tackle, why should Springfield rush to help the billionaire McCaskey family build a football stadium? The answer: They shouldn’t. The arguments so far don’t convince us that this project would truly benefit the public.
Art
“Chryssa & New York” is the first museum show in North America in more than four decades to spotlight the artist. It also highlights her strong ties to Chicago’s art world.
If these plans for new stadiums from the Bears, White Sox and Red Stars are going to have even a remote chance of passage, teams will have to drastically scale back their state asks and show some tangible benefits for state taxpayers.
The Bears put the figure at $4.7 billion. But a state official says the tally to taxpayers goes even higher when you include the cost of refinancing existing debt.