Upon further review, Bears’ season turns dark in 23-16 loss to Packers

SHARE Upon further review, Bears’ season turns dark in 23-16 loss to Packers
packers_bears_football_72495999.jpg

Bears running back Benny Cunningham dives to the end zone. (AP)

It wasn’t until he looked up at the replay on the Soldier Field video board Sunday that running back Benny Cunningham realized the Bears were in trouble.

He thought he scored on a screen pass when he dove and reached the ball to the right pylon about seven minutes into the second quarter. He ran to the sideline and said as much.

Bears coach John Fox decided he had scored, too, and challenged the ruling that he had stepped out of bounds at the 2-yard line.

“Every indication we had was that he scored,” Fox said.

The resulting turn will torture Fox long after the 23-16 loss to the Packers on Sunday in front of 5,624 empty seats.

During the replay review, officials found that Cunningham lost control of the ball before it hit the pylon, which results in a touchback, not a touchdown.

Packers ball.

RELATED STORIES

MORRISSEY: No way Bears can bring back John Fox for 2018

It’s time for Bears to take training wheels off Mitch Trubisky

“When I watched the review, I felt like they made the right call,” Cunningham said. “Just a bad play on my fault, but the refs got it right.”

Fox got it wrong. Had he not challenged, the Bears would have had first-and-goal at the 2. Because the play was ruled neither a touchdown nor a turnover on the field, it was not subject to automatic review by the officials.

The only way the play could have changed was with a coaches’ challenge. Fox, ironically, got to keep his timeout because he technically won the challenge that robbed his team of the ball.

Asked whether his coaches upstairs — who had television access — encouraged him to throw the red flag, Fox said “it stops here” with him.

“Maybe you can see [the fumble] after looking at it 50 times, like some people are able to do,” Fox said. “But during our look, during the game, that wasn’t even discussed.”

Referee Tony Corrente said after the game that Cunningham never stepped out of bounds.

“We had to put together two different angles in order to see both hands losing the football,” Corrente told a pool reporter. “After he lost it [from his left hand], it went right into the pylon. Which creates a touchback.”

Bears running backs are coached to stretch the ball out only in fourth-down situations, Cunningham said, but “I was trying to score a touchdown for the team.”

The play didn’t cost the Bears the game — they made far too many mistakes to claim otherwise — but it crushed an offense that mounted only 31 yards on 13 plays the rest of the second quarter and, amazingly, zero yards on six plays in the third.

“I just felt like it kinda killed the momentum of the offense at the time,” Cunningham said.

Follow me on Twitter @patrickfinley.

Email: pfinley@suntimes.com


The Latest
The massive pop culture convention runs through Sunday at McCormick Place.
With all the important priorities the state has to tackle, why should Springfield rush to help the billionaire McCaskey family build a football stadium? The answer: They shouldn’t. The arguments so far don’t convince us this project would truly benefit the public.
Art
“Chryssa & New York” is the first museum show in North America in more than four decades to spotlight the artist. It also highlights her strong ties to Chicago’s art world.
If these plans for new stadiums from the Bears, White Sox and Red Stars are going to have even a remote chance of passage, teams will have to drastically scale back their state asks and show some tangible benefits for state taxpayers.
The Bears put the figure at $4.7 billion. But a state official says the tally to taxpayers goes even higher when you include the cost of refinancing existing debt.