Bears have designs on the lakefront, as Mayor Johnson plays the wrong position of cheerleader-in-chief

The city is willing to put private interests ahead of public benefit and cheer on a wrongheaded effort to build a massive domed stadium — that would be perfect for Arlington Heights — on Chicago’s lakefront.

SHARE Bears have designs on the lakefront, as Mayor Johnson plays the wrong position of cheerleader-in-chief
Renderings of the proposed new Bears stadium

Rendering of the proposed new Bears stadium.

Chicago Bears

The public finally got a good look Wednesday at the Chicago Bears $4.7 billion lakefront stadium plan.

But the big reveal showed something far deeper than pretty renderings, impressive architectural animation and an optimistic financial projections.

With Mayor Brandon Johnson and his administration standing with the Bears, it is clear the city is willing to put private interests ahead of public benefit and cheer-on this ill-conceived and expensive effort to build a gargantuan domed stadium on Chicago’s lakefront.

It makes you wonder if 130 years of court battles and protests to protect and improve the lakefront mean anything on City Hall’s Fifth Floor.

A translucent dome

Designed by Manica Architecture from Kansas City, Kansas, the stadium has the same clean, machine-like and semi-futuristic look as its NFL contemporaries such as Inglewood, California’s SoFi or Allegiant in Las Vegas.

Columnists bug

Columnists


In-depth political coverage, sports analysis, entertainment reviews and cultural commentary.

The stadium’s roof would be translucent, allowing in sunlight — but not the elements. A large glass window allows views of the skyline.

“You’ll get all of the benefits of being outdoors,” Bears President and CEO Kevin Warren at the announcement. “But you’ll be indoors.”

The stadium is planned for the Waldron parking deck just south of Soldier Field.

However, check out the stadium renderings accompanying this story. Look at how big that thing is. The size almost makes the Museum Campus buildings look like neo-classical LEGO blocks in comparison.

At some angles, it looks as if it gives Lakeside Center — a building with a 19-acre roof — a run for its money.

Renderings of the proposed new Bears stadium

Renderings of the proposed new Bears stadium

Chicago Bears

While the Bears did not disclose the stadium’s dimensions, Manica-designed Allegiant is 226 feet tall. That’s almost 80 feet taller than the current Soldier Field.

Judging from the renderings, the stadium looks pretty good as far as professional sports facilities go. It’s the right building but the wrong spot.

Frankly, it would’ve fit well in Arlington Heights, had the team not up and abandoned its bid to build there.

And imagine what it might’ve done for the old South Works site at 79th Street and right there on the lake. The team would have had to solve the parcel’s environmental issues, but given the team is going to ask for a billion in stadium subsidies anyway (more on that later) why not go there?

But a big pro football stadium with all the fixings in the heart of the lakefront? The city should have passed. Or run.

And proof of that can be seen in the Bears plan for Soldier Field. The team proposed yanking out the stadium’s seating bowl and almost all its innards and turning the spot into a recreational area within the preserved historic colonnades.

“We’ll make this a place where people will want to come and spend time,” Warren said.

The irony? With the old playing field turned into baseball fields and parkland, the retooled Soldier Field would be far more harmonious with the lakefront and the Museum Campus than the out-of-scale football stadium that would make it possible.

Who’s in charge?

When it comes to the new stadium, the Bears — not city government — are running the offense here, and that’s troubling.

Team officials acted like city-paid planners and transit experts as they outlined the additional roadways and infrastructure needs that would have to happen to get the project off the ground.

Meanwhile, Team Johnson stood by as a private entity took the lead and told how the public’s lakefront would be redeveloped.

As madding as that is, can you really blame the Bears? In the parlance of their game, they saw an opening — or perhaps a weakness in City Hall — and took it.

Admittedly, the Waldron parking deck is a concrete eyesore and does a disservice to the lakefront. The Museum Campus needs a revamp and Soldier Field is showing its age.

But the public and elected officials, not the Bears, should be the ones deciding what remedies are needed.

Meanwhile, the Bears said they will pay $2 billion to design and construct the publicly-owned stadium — with the help of the NFL and the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority.

There is a catch though: The team also said it would require an additional $1.5 billion in public infrastructure and transit to make all those pretty renderings fully come to life.

How can a mayor — an allegedly progressive one, at that — allow a billion-dollar football franchise to build what it likes on the lakefront, then charge taxpayers for the privilege? It’s outright ridiculous.

But, somehow, not to Johnson.

“Simply put, this is going to reinvigorate the entire city of Chicago,” Johnson said. “It will be the crown jewel of the city of Chicago.”

Wrong, Mr. Mayor. Chicago’s crown jewel is its lakefront. And you’re helping to tarnish it.

The Sun-Times welcomes letters to the editor and op-eds. See our guidelines.

More coverage of the Bears' stadium plans
Latest Bears Stadium Updates
El gobernador J.B. Pritzker ha expresado en varias ocasiones su escepticismo sobre los planes de los Bears para el estadio, que incluyen subvenciones públicas. Este miércoles, el equipo se reúne con dos altos funcionarios de Pritzker.
Gov. J.B. Pritzker has repeatedly voiced skepticism over the Bears’ stadium plans, which include public subsidies. On Wednesday, the team will meet with two top Pritzker staffers.
The Bears put the figure at $4.7 billion. But a state official says the tally to taxpayers goes even higher when you include the cost of refinancing existing debt.
The vision laid out by the Bears on Wednesday included detailed renderings of Museum Campus upgrades, including the conversion of Soldier Field to public parkland. But all that work would be paid for by taxpayers, not the team.
The USC quarterback, whom the Bears are expected to pick first in the NFL draft here on Thursday night, was clear that he’s prepared to play in cold temperatures in the NFL.
The plans, according to the team, will include additional green and open space with access to the lakefront and the Museum Campus, which Bears President Kevin Warren called “the most attractive footprint in the world.”
Gov. J.B. Pritzker brushed aside the latest proposal, which includes more than $2 billion in private funds but still requires taxpayer subsidies, saying it “isn’t one that I think the taxpayers are interested in getting engaged in.”
Fans said they liked the new amenities and features in the $4.7 billion stadium proposal unveiled Wednesday, although some worried the south lakefront could become even more congested than it is now.
Two additional infrastructure phases that would “maximize the site” and bring “additional opportunities for publicly owned amenities” could bring taxpayers’ tab to $1.5 billion over about five years, according to the team.
The final project would turn the current Soldier Field site into a park-like area, but that wouldn’t necessitate playing home games elsewhere during construction.
    Latest Columns and Commentary
    Gov. J.B. Pritzker needs to stand firm in the face of team’s demands for a new stadium.
    With all the important priorities the state has to tackle, why should Springfield rush to help the billionaire McCaskey family build a football stadium? The answer: They shouldn’t. The arguments so far don’t convince us this project would truly benefit the public.
    If these plans for new stadiums from the Bears, White Sox and Red Stars are going to have even a remote chance of passage, teams will have to drastically scale back their state asks and show some tangible benefits for state taxpayers.
    Not a dollar of taxpayer money went to the renovation of Wrigley Field and its current reinvigorated neighborhood, one reader points out.
    In exchange for billions of dollars in public money, the public deserves an ownership stake in the franchises.
    We all love sports teams, but regular people don’t own the buildings or the land they frolic upon. We just pay homage to the teams — and to the power-laden who own them.
    That the Bears can just diesel their way in, Bronko Nagurski-style, and attempt to set a sweeping agenda for the future of one of the world’s most iconic water frontages is more than a bit troubling.
    Based on what we’ve seen of the Bears plans so far, and given the lakefront’s civic importance, Mayor Johnson should steer the team to consider other locations in Chicago.
    The idea of two new stadiums and public funding should be a nonstarter.
    With a “financing partnership” between the two sports teams now in the works, Chicagoans know more about what they might be up against: Two wealthy sports teams joining forces to get huge taxpayer subsidies.

      The Latest
      A man was killed and another wounded in the shooting April 9 in the 6900 block of North Glenwood Avenue.
      The White Sox mustered three hits against Sonny Gray and the Cards’ bullpen.
      On Aug. 20,1972, this reporter was assigned to cover the hordes of hippies, yippies, women’s libbers, Marxists, gay rights advocates, Black Panthers, and anti-Vietnam war vets tenting, talking, and toking it up in Miami’s Flamingo Park before the Republican National Convention kicked off.
      Restaurants and bars anticipate a big revenue boost from the city’s outdoor dining program — especially with key summer events like NASCAR and the Democratic National Convention.