No love for new Bears stadium from Illinois' top Democrats

Gov. J.B. Pritzker brushed aside the latest proposal, which includes more than $2 billion in private funds but still requires taxpayer subsidies, saying it “isn’t one that I think the taxpayers are interested in getting engaged in.”

SHARE No love for new Bears stadium from Illinois' top Democrats
Gov. J.B. Pritzker speaks at a podium, flanked by Illinois House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch (left) and Illinois Senate President Don Harmon (right)

Gov. J.B. Pritzker (center), Illinois House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch (left) and Illinois Senate President Don Harmon (right) are not quite sold on the new Bears stadium proposal.

Blue Room Stream

Chicago Bears President Kevin Warren’s glitzy new lakefront stadium proposal was met with a resounding no by the state’s top Democrats on Wednesday.

At least for now.

Noticeably absent from the Bears unveiling, Gov. J.B. Pritzker echoed previous public statements and again brushed aside the latest proposal — which includes more than $2 billion in private funds from the Bears but still requires taxpayer subsidies, saying it “isn’t one that I think the taxpayers are interested in getting engaged in.”

The cost of the project is estimated at $4.7 billion — with $900 million coming from 40-year bonds issued by the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority, which are backed by the city’s 2% hotel tax. But it also includes at least $325 million in taxpayer-backed infrastructure improvements to make the stadium and Museum Campus more accessible.

And that’s just to start the project. It would require another $1.2 billion in subsequent phases.

“I’m highly skeptical of the proposal that’s been made, and I believe strongly that this is not a high priority for legislators and certainly not for me, when I compare it to all the other things,” Pritzker said at an unrelated press conference in southwest suburban New Lenox.

The Democratic governor noted that even on-field success has not helped in other cities like Kansas City, where voters rejected a measure that would have helped fund renovations for Arrowhead Stadium, home to the NFL’s Super Bowl champion Chiefs, and a new ballpark for the Royals.

“Maybe one lesson that can be learned just from the last few years is stadium deals, and taxpayers putting money forward for stadium deals, [are] not particularly popular around the country. Take note that the winner of the Super Bowl this year, the team went out to try to get the stadium financed by the public and it was rejected by the public in a place where the Super Bowl champions reside,” Pritzker said.

“And I think this is a recognition that these are private businesses. That the owners of these private businesses need to put a lot more forward ... [to] have their dreams fulfilled and not just rely upon the taxpayers of Illinois to make that happen for them.”

Later, Illinois House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch, D-Hillside, publicly squashed the Bears chances of getting legislation passed during the current legislative session, which is scheduled to adjourn on May 24 but is likely to extend into the waning days of May.

“I want to say to you publicly what I said to Kevin Warren privately last week. If we were to put this issue on the board for a vote right now, it would fail, and it would fail miserably,” Welch said at a separate press conference in Maywood. “There’s no environment for something like this today. Now, in Springfield, environments change. Will that environment change within the next 30 days? I think that’s highly unlikely.”

Illinois Senate President Don Harmon, D-Oak Park, issued a statement showing he, like Pritzker, was cautious at best.

“At first glance, more than $2 billion in private funding is better than zero and a more credible opening offer,” he said. “But there’s an obvious, substantial gap remaining, and I echo the governor’s skepticism.”

More coverage of the Bears' stadium plans
Latest Bears Stadium Updates
El gobernador J.B. Pritzker ha expresado en varias ocasiones su escepticismo sobre los planes de los Bears para el estadio, que incluyen subvenciones públicas. Este miércoles, el equipo se reúne con dos altos funcionarios de Pritzker.
Gov. J.B. Pritzker has repeatedly voiced skepticism over the Bears’ stadium plans, which include public subsidies. On Wednesday, the team will meet with two top Pritzker staffers.
The Bears put the figure at $4.7 billion. But a state official says the tally to taxpayers goes even higher when you include the cost of refinancing existing debt.
The vision laid out by the Bears on Wednesday included detailed renderings of Museum Campus upgrades, including the conversion of Soldier Field to public parkland. But all that work would be paid for by taxpayers, not the team.
The USC quarterback, whom the Bears are expected to pick first in the NFL draft here on Thursday night, was clear that he’s prepared to play in cold temperatures in the NFL.
The plans, according to the team, will include additional green and open space with access to the lakefront and the Museum Campus, which Bears President Kevin Warren called “the most attractive footprint in the world.”
Fans said they liked the new amenities and features in the $4.7 billion stadium proposal unveiled Wednesday, although some worried the south lakefront could become even more congested than it is now.
Two additional infrastructure phases that would “maximize the site” and bring “additional opportunities for publicly owned amenities” could bring taxpayers’ tab to $1.5 billion over about five years, according to the team.
The final project would turn the current Soldier Field site into a park-like area, but that wouldn’t necessitate playing home games elsewhere during construction.
The Bears have hired political veteran Andrea Zopp to serve as a senior adviser on their legal team.
    Latest Columns and Commentary
    Gov. J.B. Pritzker needs to stand firm in the face of team’s demands for a new stadium.
    With all the important priorities the state has to tackle, why should Springfield rush to help the billionaire McCaskey family build a football stadium? The answer: They shouldn’t. The arguments so far don’t convince us this project would truly benefit the public.
    If these plans for new stadiums from the Bears, White Sox and Red Stars are going to have even a remote chance of passage, teams will have to drastically scale back their state asks and show some tangible benefits for state taxpayers.
    Not a dollar of taxpayer money went to the renovation of Wrigley Field and its current reinvigorated neighborhood, one reader points out.
    In exchange for billions of dollars in public money, the public deserves an ownership stake in the franchises.
    The city is willing to put private interests ahead of public benefit and cheer on a wrongheaded effort to build a massive domed stadium — that would be perfect for Arlington Heights — on Chicago’s lakefront.
    We all love sports teams, but regular people don’t own the buildings or the land they frolic upon. We just pay homage to the teams — and to the power-laden who own them.
    That the Bears can just diesel their way in, Bronko Nagurski-style, and attempt to set a sweeping agenda for the future of one of the world’s most iconic water frontages is more than a bit troubling.
    Based on what we’ve seen of the Bears plans so far, and given the lakefront’s civic importance, Mayor Johnson should steer the team to consider other locations in Chicago.
    The idea of two new stadiums and public funding should be a nonstarter.

      The Latest
      The employee, a 45-year-old man, exchanged gunfire Friday night with two people who entered the business in the 2900 block of West North Avenue and announced a robbery.
      Around 1:50 a.m., the man was found shot in the head on the sidewalk in the 3800 block of West Flournoy Street, Chicago police said.
      Just after midnight, a 49-year-old man was standing in the street in the 3000 block of West Warren Boulevard when someone exited a white sedan and opened fire, Chicago police said.
      An Indiana record yellow perch, green herons at Rosehill cemetery and finding morel mushrooms set against a Christopher Morel home run, noted in the Sun-Times used as a time stamp, are among the notes from around Chicago outdoors and beyond.