Bears should think big on lakefront domed stadium, state lawmaker says

State Rep. Kam Buckner, whose district includes Soldier Field, wants to put public transit in an underutilized busway to make the lakefront more accessible and surround the new stadium with bars, restaurants and a hotel.

SHARE Bears should think big on lakefront domed stadium, state lawmaker says
Aerial view of Soldier Field, Burnham Harbor and the lakefront.

The Chicago Bears haven’t yet decided where they will focus their new stadium efforts — in Arlington Heights, where it bought the now-closed Arlington International Racecourse, or on land south of the team’s current home, Soldier Field, along Lake Michigan. But if they are dreaming of a new lakefront stadium, one state lawmaker says, make that dream a big one.

Sun-Times file

If the Bears want to make the most of a potential lakefront stadium, a state lawmaker whose district includes Soldier Field wants the team to think big — by using a little-known VIP busway to make the lakefront more accessible and surrounding a new stadium with an entertainment district to attract fans before and after games.

State Rep. Kam Buckner, D-Chicago, has long been an idea machine, as demonstrated by the ambitious plans he trotted out during his failed 2023 mayoral campaign.

Now, he’s got a ton of ideas about how to help the Bears finance a new domed stadium that could finally bring a Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four to Chicago and use that project to solve several long-standing issues: transportation to and along the lakefront; the absence of bars, restaurants and entertainment venues around Soldier Field and the long-standing desire to turn surface parking lots into green space.

The key, Buckner said, is forging a partnership — not just with the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority, which financed Soldier Field, but with the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, which has even larger bonding powers.

The governmental agency better known as “McPier” also operates the busway that whisks VIPs and conventiongoers to and from McCormick Place.

Developer Bob Dunn, who knows Bears President and CEO Kevin Warren from their days together building the $1.1 billion U.S. Bank Stadium for the Minnesota Vikings, wanted to use that busway as a cornerstone for his long-stalled One Central project.

Make lakefront access easier

Buckner thinks the roadway between Randolph Street and McCormick Place that former Mayor Rahm Emanuel dubbed “the Bat Cave” could be used to help make the lakefront more accessible.

“Right now, to get from McCormick Place to Soldier Field to Navy Pier, which should be seamless, is almost impossible,” Buckner told the Sun-Times.

“ I’ve heard folks talk about cable cars, like trolleys, up and down that VIP bus space. Or light rail,” he said. “I don’t know which one makes sense. ... But that has to be part of the conversation if this is gonna move forward.

“There may be some federal funds that can be leveraged here when it comes to connecting of the lakefront. This is a big, monumental project.”

To entice the Bears to stay in Chicago, a new lakefront stadium — “somewhere between the south parking lot and the McCormick Place East” building — also needs surrounding restaurants, bars and even a hotel, Buckner said.

That would make it a miniversion of the environment the team has dreamed of building at the 326-acre site of the old Arlington International Racecourse. The Bears spent $197.2 million to purchase that property, only to be stymied by a property tax stalemate with suburban school districts.

“What NFL teams have done recently is create a total fan experience outside of a football game. ... Much like the Ricketts family did, and I helped them work on with the Wrigley Field project,” said Buckner, who spent three years working for the Cubs.

Creating ‘a total fan experience’

“Right now, the Bears have a pretty bum deal. They can’t do much to Soldier Field in terms of parking and concessions. ... They can’t make it a total fan experience. A fan experience in Chicago really should be more than walking under Lake Shore Drive in frigid temperatures,” he said.

Forging a partnership with McPier would not only open the door to using the busway, but also unlock the bonding authority to finance a new stadium without forcing state lawmakers to, as Buckner put it, “choose between our children,” referring to the Bears and White Sox.

Those teams both hope to use the limited borrowing power of the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority, backed by the same two percentage point increase in the hotel tax that financed the Soldier Field renovation.

The developer working with the Sox on a potential South Loop stadium told the Sun-Times Monday he’s trying to forge a “financing partnership” with the Bears to pave the way for Chicago to build two new stadiums at the same time.

Related Midwest President Curt Bailey and spokesperson Tricia Van Horn had no immediate comment on Buckner’s ideas. Neither did the Bears.

Jason Lee, a senior adviser to Mayor Brandon Johnson, could not be reached. Neither could Dunn, who has a vested interest in keeping Soldier Field viable because of One Central, his dream of a $20 billion high-rise community. Dunn helped now former Mayor Lori Lightfoot craft her plan to put a dome over Soldier Field. Some observers expect him to surface in the Bears stadium sweepstakes.

Buckner said he does not believe the Lakefront Protection Ordinance would prevent a new lakefront stadium and entertainment district, though Friends of the Parks has vowed the same court fight that prompted movie mogul George Lucas to abandon putting his interactive museum on Lake Michigan and move it to Los Angeles.

That ordinance “says no new private construction east of DuSable Lake Shore Drive,” Buckner said. “If the Bears partner with the Chicago Park District and McPier, it would be public construction.”

Friends of the Parks Board member Fred Bates said his organization — the top civic line of defense against any lakefront development — is “deeply concerned” about the Bears’ potential aspirations near Soldier Field.

“We have not been approached by the team, and I’m somewhat puzzled by that. We had a sense of what was in the wings since Kam Buckner moved the idea into the limelight, so this didn’t catch us by surprise, but it troubles us.”

Bates added: “We have the same view we’ve had in the past: that this is fundamentally a private enterprise that doesn’t belong on the lakefront.”

Contributing: Mitchell Armentrout

More coverage of the Bears' stadium plans
Latest Bears Stadium Updates
El gobernador J.B. Pritzker ha expresado en varias ocasiones su escepticismo sobre los planes de los Bears para el estadio, que incluyen subvenciones públicas. Este miércoles, el equipo se reúne con dos altos funcionarios de Pritzker.
Gov. J.B. Pritzker has repeatedly voiced skepticism over the Bears’ stadium plans, which include public subsidies. On Wednesday, the team will meet with two top Pritzker staffers.
The Bears put the figure at $4.7 billion. But a state official says the tally to taxpayers goes even higher when you include the cost of refinancing existing debt.
The vision laid out by the Bears on Wednesday included detailed renderings of Museum Campus upgrades, including the conversion of Soldier Field to public parkland. But all that work would be paid for by taxpayers, not the team.
The USC quarterback, whom the Bears are expected to pick first in the NFL draft here on Thursday night, was clear that he’s prepared to play in cold temperatures in the NFL.
The plans, according to the team, will include additional green and open space with access to the lakefront and the Museum Campus, which Bears President Kevin Warren called “the most attractive footprint in the world.”
Gov. J.B. Pritzker brushed aside the latest proposal, which includes more than $2 billion in private funds but still requires taxpayer subsidies, saying it “isn’t one that I think the taxpayers are interested in getting engaged in.”
Fans said they liked the new amenities and features in the $4.7 billion stadium proposal unveiled Wednesday, although some worried the south lakefront could become even more congested than it is now.
Two additional infrastructure phases that would “maximize the site” and bring “additional opportunities for publicly owned amenities” could bring taxpayers’ tab to $1.5 billion over about five years, according to the team.
The final project would turn the current Soldier Field site into a park-like area, but that wouldn’t necessitate playing home games elsewhere during construction.
    Latest Columns and Commentary
    Gov. J.B. Pritzker needs to stand firm in the face of team’s demands for a new stadium.
    With all the important priorities the state has to tackle, why should Springfield rush to help the billionaire McCaskey family build a football stadium? The answer: They shouldn’t. The arguments so far don’t convince us this project would truly benefit the public.
    If these plans for new stadiums from the Bears, White Sox and Red Stars are going to have even a remote chance of passage, teams will have to drastically scale back their state asks and show some tangible benefits for state taxpayers.
    Not a dollar of taxpayer money went to the renovation of Wrigley Field and its current reinvigorated neighborhood, one reader points out.
    In exchange for billions of dollars in public money, the public deserves an ownership stake in the franchises.
    The city is willing to put private interests ahead of public benefit and cheer on a wrongheaded effort to build a massive domed stadium — that would be perfect for Arlington Heights — on Chicago’s lakefront.
    We all love sports teams, but regular people don’t own the buildings or the land they frolic upon. We just pay homage to the teams — and to the power-laden who own them.
    That the Bears can just diesel their way in, Bronko Nagurski-style, and attempt to set a sweeping agenda for the future of one of the world’s most iconic water frontages is more than a bit troubling.
    Based on what we’ve seen of the Bears plans so far, and given the lakefront’s civic importance, Mayor Johnson should steer the team to consider other locations in Chicago.
    The idea of two new stadiums and public funding should be a nonstarter.

      The Latest
      On Aug. 20,1972, this reporter was assigned to cover the hordes of hippies, yippies, women’s libbers, Marxists, gay rights advocates, Black Panthers, and anti-Vietnam war vets tenting, talking, and toking it up in Miami’s Flamingo Park before the Republican National Convention kicked off.
      Restaurants and bars anticipate a big revenue boost from the city’s outdoor dining program — especially with key summer events like NASCAR and the Democratic National Convention.
      Vaughn, who slumped most of April, entered Friday’s game in St. Louis batting .308 in his last six games
      The Cubs (19-14) and Alzolay need to find answers to his struggles.
      If any longtime watchers of the Cubs and Brewers didn’t know which manager was in which dugout Friday at Wrigley Field, they might have assumed the hotshot with the richest contract ever for a big-league skipper was still on the visitors’ side.